• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

what kind of compression do you run?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerry S
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2004

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Mar 25, 2004
#1
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #1
The shop building my engine proposed a 11.5:1 CR when I told them that 98 octane gas is the standard here in Europe for high octane. Then I accidentially discovered that our 98 is more like US 94 octane. At that point, I suggested that they take it down a notch. I am told that I can run 10.5:1 on 94 and not have any problems. Further to this, they say that my engine will be able to accomodate a blower in the future if I keep it to no more than 5 lbs of boost. I don't want to be pushing the envelop here. Does anyone here have experience running 10 or 10.5:1 and would you concur with the assessment offered by my shop?
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Mar 25, 2004
#2
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #2
I run a 10.5 to 1 and use minimun of 92 to 93 octane. At the track I jump to a minimum of 100 octane.

I also chose to go a little low on the compression to help the motor last in the 3 hour Enduro races.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Mar 25, 2004
#3
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #3
I run Europes std 98 gas (lower one here in Finland 95, as prob for you also)

I have -69 351W with no probs with 10,5 compression. It depends also of the cam you have and degree of ignition.. So, I think youll be fine with 10,5... But the Blower part doesn´t sound so good? Even with centrifugal I´d stay around 9:1.
 

dolfan87

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,242
0
0
Lake Havasu, AZ
Mar 25, 2004
#4
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #4
10.5:1 is pushing it for a blower. You could do it, but wouldn't it make more sense to build a 9.0:1 engine, and then add the super charger? Even if you plan on waiting for the blower, you could live with the 9:1 in the mean time.

Just my .02 cents

87
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Mar 25, 2004
#5
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #5
I would be conservative and NOT run a blower at CRs above 10:1

I run 10.5:1, 93 octane, no issues.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Mar 25, 2004
#6
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #6
10.5 :1 is too much for a blower, unless you want to be a slave to ADI alcohol injection, and intercooling. To spend the $$ and only realize 5 lbs boost is not really worth it.
I also agree that you lower the CR.
I'm running 8.8:1 CR and 10lbs of boost on 92 octane-- no issues
 

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Mar 25, 2004
#7
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #7
You can make your own octane boost with a trip to Home Depot, this is not a joke and is proven scientifically. I myself have done it for the last year and it works well. I can provide further details but I'm really "just an instigating $#%&*@#" according Leghump67
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Mar 25, 2004
#8
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #8
I run 10.6:1 in my engine on 91(highest I can get in California) with some additive. A blower is going to be close with that compression and probably not worth the gains for only 5 psi. If you want to go the blower route get 9:1 compression. That is much better suited for supercharers. If you are going naturally asperated anything above 10:1 is where you want to be. You have to decide which way you want your engine to get its power and then decide on how you need to build it.
Kevin
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Mar 25, 2004
#9
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #9
GT2K said:
You can make your own octane boost with a trip to Home Depot, this is not a joke and is proven scientifically. I myself have done it for the last year and it works well.
Click to expand...

I've ran a few mixes of tolulene with 92 octane, but it seemed that the ratio, be it 10:1 or higher had to be THOROUGHLY mixed, so just pouring it in a tank I didn't think was the best method.
Turco seemed to be much easier to work with and more consistant.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Mar 25, 2004
#10
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #10
I run 11:1 and with 5 degrees of initial timing, 800 rpm I can run 93 octane with zero pinging & "run-on" on the street. For race day I add 108 octane and advance the timing to 15 degrees with a happy motor.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Mar 25, 2004
#11
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #11
8.8 for me with a turbo on the way. If I was only going to run 5lbs of boost, I would use the 2g's for the blower to build a better n/a motor. A blower is not worth it for 5lbs.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Mar 25, 2004
#12
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #12
10.5:1 roller 306 w/ flat tops and shaved 58cc RPM heads.

91 calif (76,chevron only) gas for the street and 103 VP unleaded for the track
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Mar 25, 2004
#13
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #13
with aluminum heads you can always get away with a little more comp I built a 11.1 comp 351 and the customer ran sunoco 94 and never had a problem. You should be fine with your comp ratio at 10.5 w alum heads.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 25, 2004
#14
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #14
Gosh, I feel funny running a 10.25 to 1 ratio on 87 octane Wally world gas. Motor in my 68 Merc runs fine on it mixed every other tank with CD2 lead substitute. It's a std bore, stock piston, Crane 272 degree Energizer cammed 390 with 12 degrees initial timing ( stock dist. with Pertronix)
 

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Mar 25, 2004
#15
  • Mar 25, 2004
  • #15
slapper said:
I've ran a few mixes of tolulene with 92 octane, but it seemed that the ratio, be it 10:1 or higher had to be THOROUGHLY mixed, so just pouring it in a tank I didn't think was the best method.
Turco seemed to be much easier to work with and more consistant.
Click to expand...

I actually mix it all in the fuel can with some Marvel's Mystery Oil too. Gotta check but I think I was actually running Xylene. You do have to mix it good though, I agree with you there. I'm nearly 11 to 1 myself. Next motor will go the other way for the charger
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Mar 26, 2004
#16
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #16
I run 10.6 in my Cleveland, and it seems to be ok. I have a pretty good cam though to bleed off cylinder pressure at low rpms: 236 @ 50 and .562
As long as you have some cam and some converter, it should be ok.

DD-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
247
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Alternator not charging
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
75
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sunday at 9:21 AM
SchwarzStock
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
366
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
Fox What gas do you run in your foxbody?
  • Mindseye007
  • May 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 19, 2024
Bullitt347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
911
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?