• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What kinda power am I looking at?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 79 Fox
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2019
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 28, 2019
#1
  • May 28, 2019
  • #1
Hey guys! Recently finished building a nice 302. At first, I estimated 275 horsepower, but that seems low. Anyone have a similar build, or a good guess on power? GT40P heads (upgraded springs, not ported) B303 cam, 1.72:1 rockers, Edelbrock performer intake, Holley 600cfm carb, very nice K&N air cleaner, unequal length shorty headers, BBK h-pipe, no catalytic converter, no A/C, dual electric fan
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,253
17,937
224
Massachusetts
May 28, 2019
#2
  • May 28, 2019
  • #2
Anywhere from 275-300 rwHP.

Usually the 300 rwHP combos have some good money sunk into them. Porting, different valves, maybe a custom grind cam, etc.

Good thread for reference, although most are EFI combos

Official GT40P headed 300rwhp thread!!!

I've noticed over the past year that quite a few SN95 owners are using GT40P's. Some of them have had amazing results, like Darkpony (297rwhp), and others seem to tap at around 245rwhp... Personally I've hit 271rwhp and 305rwtq running extremely lean (18:1 yikes). I figure their was a little...
www.stangnet.com
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 28, 2019
#3
  • May 28, 2019
  • #3
275 at the tire is on the high side for that combo but not unrealistic.
 

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 28, 2019
#4
  • May 28, 2019
  • #4
I was only thinking 275 crank. I have no clue though. The more the merrier!
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 28, 2019
#5
  • May 28, 2019
  • #5
Yah that's definitely doable. The cam is holding you back.
 

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 28, 2019
#6
  • May 28, 2019
  • #6
Whats wrong with the cam? Would I need a custom ground cam? Or is there a better aftermarket cam out there?
 
Last edited: May 28, 2019

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,916
10,566
203
polk county florida
May 28, 2019
#7
  • May 28, 2019
  • #7

Guess My H P !!! - The Dyno & 1/4 Mile Time Thread

UPDATE - FastDriver (26AUG13): After some recent interest in the forums, this thread is again active. Please feel free to add your own dyno, timeslip, and mods. The more details you can provide, the better. Posts without documentation will eventually be deleted. This thread exists to give...
www.stangnet.com
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 28, 2019
#8
  • May 28, 2019
  • #8
Someone please post the b-cam video. @79 Fox the b cam is, well, generally considered be terrible. The stocker with the 1.72s make actually be better. There are at least a half dozen OTS cams that are better. If you plan on swapping, a custom cam is far superior and does not cost that much more than the more popular OTS cams.
 

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 28, 2019
#9
  • May 28, 2019
  • #9
Ok. I'll look into a custom ground cam.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
May 28, 2019
#10
  • May 28, 2019
  • #10
 
Reactions: Boostedpimp and deathb4dismount

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 28, 2019
#11
  • May 28, 2019
  • #11
I think I'll just stick with the B cam for now. In a couple years, I'll be building a new, more potent engine anyways.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,089
2,695
224
Vass, NC
May 29, 2019
#12
  • May 29, 2019
  • #12
the horse kind
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,253
17,937
224
Massachusetts
May 29, 2019
#13
  • May 29, 2019
  • #13
Nothing wrong with a GT-40P head and B cam combo. Years back I drove my friend's '93 LX with a 306 and GT40P's and a B cam and factory 3.08's. It was a blast to drive that car as it made plenty of power and really liked to rev. Solid combo.

I wouldn't really run out to change the cam right now. Not worth it for what you'd gain. If you ever decide to go with a better head, then you should revisit the cam
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,916
10,566
203
polk county florida
May 29, 2019
#14
  • May 29, 2019
  • #14
Since you are running a carbed setup the b cam is fine, granted there are better choices in a modern cam but you're good. Like said above, better heads need a better cam.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
May 29, 2019
#15
  • May 29, 2019
  • #15
You can always slap a bigger cam into an engine, but how undriveable do you want to make it?
 

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 29, 2019
#16
  • May 29, 2019
  • #16
I know! I want it to be a very drivable car. Something that doesn't need to rev practically to redline to make max power.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,916
10,566
203
polk county florida
May 29, 2019
#17
  • May 29, 2019
  • #17
Lets get a little more info,
rear gears
trans type (stick or auto)
 

79 Fox

Active Member
May 21, 2019
141
14
28
A van down by the river
May 30, 2019
#18
  • May 30, 2019
  • #18
3.73, C4 auto (for now. I'm 15 and still getting used to driving)
 

Wolf_Fox

Member
May 26, 2019
19
3
13
California
May 30, 2019
#19
  • May 30, 2019
  • #19
I have a very similar combo besides fuel injection: edelbrock performer heads, trick flow rockers and springs, BBK ssi intake, & long tubes. Not sure what cam is in the dang thing though. Before i tuned it properly it made about 280hp on the dyno. (you'll lose a tiny bit on an auto) But it also made about the same in torque... And that's where the bite is. I have 3.55 gears on a T5 and shoot, it snaps necks with some good grip. More than enough for a daily in my opinion.
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
May 30, 2019
#20
  • May 30, 2019
  • #20
79 Fox said:
3.73, C4 auto (for now. I'm 15 and still getting used to driving)
Click to expand...
Oh then you are doing great...drive the wheels off it while you build a more potent combo
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
242
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
786
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
871
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?