• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What longtubes and midpipe for 351w?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IndyBlk5.0
  • Start date Start date Jul 21, 2004

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Jul 21, 2004
#1
  • Jul 21, 2004
  • #1
Im aiming for 425rwhp n/a (h/c/i and carb) 10.5:1 comp ratio. and 575rwhp with 150 shot.

I need to know what long tubes would be better? What brands are there out there that will fit with a 351 swap? Expensive?
What mid pipe?
3 inch or 2 1/2 inch?
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Jul 21, 2004
#2
  • Jul 21, 2004
  • #2
Brand's like Hooker, BBK, Kook's, Mac all make decent 351W swap header's. 1 3/4 pipe would work just fine but you can go 1 7/8 if you want a bit more on the top end. I run BBK's 1 3/4 Header's and I'm fairly happy with them. Really Nice quality, although I did have to do some banging on them a bit to clear the steering shaft which may be because of the AFR head's having .500" higher exhaust ports. The collector design on the BBK's are not your standard 3" Collector design.... they use a flange style connection instead which is kind of nice as you don't have to change collector gasket's all the time and the chances of them ever leaking are slim to none. The only downside to this design is it dosn't flow as great as your standard 3" collector, but the difference is very marginal. Probably 3-5HP. I woudn't be afraid to recomend these to anyone... there available in chrome (They Turn Blue After A While) or coated. If you don't mind spending a bit more money then I would definetly go with a nice set of Kook's Header's and get them coated. I've talked to alot of people using these header's and they were very happy and impressed with them. Kook's has definetly made a good name for themselve's in the header business, so I would definetly price them out. Overall though I'd say the BBK's are the best bang for the buck 351 Swap header out there right now.
As for Mid Pipe you could go with either 2 1/2 or 3" it's your call. 3" would probably be the better way to go on a Stroker. Once Again 3" will get you a bit more HP in the mid to high RPM's, 2 1/2 will get you a bit more on the bottom end. I'm running a Custom built Mandrel Bent 3" X-Pipe with Dynomax Bullet's Dumped.....Meanest sounding Car in my Area!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
5
Mods with 95 computer - will these be ok?
  • 5ohguy
  • Jul 9, 2019
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 9, 2019
RioRed95Cobra
R
Progress Thread finishing touches on my stroker build
  • doobismaximus
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2021
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?