• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

what modifications would i want to stay away from

  • Thread starter Thread starter autumn_again
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

ford302redneck

Member
Jul 28, 2007
85
0
6
Hartsville, SC
Feb 2, 2008
#21
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #21
I semi agree with stock gears.

Not that I have them. lol.

But They came already in the car, and honestly, I wish I could go back.

BTW, you don't HAVE TO do gears right now. You could always wait till after your install then decided.

Also, listen to Grady, from what Ive seen, he knows whats up or down.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 2, 2008
#22
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #22
autumn_again said:
whys that?

i was actually looking at them, so its good to know to stay away from them now. because they were ones i was looking at.
Click to expand...

because:

1. they are a real pain to work around; it is very hard to get to some of the plugs
2. they burn up spark plug boots. at least mine did, and i even had those heat shield protector thingies on them
3. what little gain there is does not pay for the pain they cause
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Feb 2, 2008
#23
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #23
Pokageek said:
DONT buy mallory fuel rails or a "jegs" catback system.
Click to expand...

AHAHAHA dude you were sooooooo pissed at thoes rails....
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 2, 2008
#24
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #24
DDSTANG94 said:
why do u want stock gears soo bad ????
Click to expand...

i don't, i'd actually like to put some different gears in, because of the improvements i hear on them.

but i'd hate to buy them just to pull them out because they wont work well with a blower.
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 2, 2008
#25
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #25
Methodical said:
I think your first ? to BlackVert should've been - Why not?

On a side note. If you buy parts you no longer need you can sell them easily. So not to big of a deal there.
Click to expand...

yeah thats basically what i meant by it. like why is that i shouldn't buy them. why not suits the question better though.

and the thing with buying parts that i wont need anymore, is that i'll buy them, and if i buy them new, i'll take a hit when i sell them used.

i won't make my money back on the part, so i'd be losing money. it may only be a couple bucks, but a whole bunch of parts that i won't be using anymore, selling at a couple bucks cheaper, it adds up.
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 2, 2008
#26
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #26
final5-0 said:
Any Aluminum head will give you thicker decks which is better for boost
and they will flow better as well. They could be some of the older FMS
heads or what ever you can find.

Adequate fuel supply is big intank pump, 42# injs and you'll need a
matching caled meter to go with them.

You'll need a hotter ignition to deal with spark blow out

You know ... common sense things

To make 400 to the wheels ........

You don't need a butch of fancy forged this and that

Of course the choice in rear ratio has nothing to do with the goal but as
you said ... why buy twice so I'd kind of think 355's or 373's since the
blower is gonna be involved.

Since it seems as this is a long term project and budget is a key factor

Just keep you eyes peeled for good used deals on the simple stuff
like headers, tb, and the like.

The point I was trying to make you don't need all the best parts
since the boost can make up for a few misgivings here and there.

If you wanna run NA for a while before boost then you might have to do
a bit of double dipping with things like inj's, maf, and such because what
works good for NA won't be adequate for boost.

Example: I don't see how you could run 42's without a tune
so
You might have to run smaller inj's while NA and the 42's later

Grady
Click to expand...

yep i'm always on craigslist looking for good deals locally, seeing if i can find anything to bring me to my goal faster.

so would it be smarter just to wait till i have all the acquired parts to go to S/C instead of ripping things apart multiple times and doing them over.

things like the intank pump and ignition set up i can't go wrong with though correct? like ahead of time before i go forced induction.

i'd like to get this underway this april at englishtown swap meet, pick up some parts for the car to get its to its goal.
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 2, 2008
#27
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #27
BlackVert said:
because:

1. they are a real pain to work around; it is very hard to get to some of the plugs
2. they burn up spark plug boots. at least mine did, and i even had those heat shield protector thingies on them
3. what little gain there is does not pay for the pain they cause
Click to expand...

ah, so they turn regular maintenence into a hassle.

shorties or long tubes is there a certain one that is better for S/C?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 2, 2008
#28
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #28
i didn't like the long tubes i got (KOOKs), but others are very happy with theirs.

i dumped the KOOKs and got accufab mid-lengths ... i like them

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=734236
 

ford302redneck

Member
Jul 28, 2007
85
0
6
Hartsville, SC
Feb 2, 2008
#29
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #29
You didn't like Kooks?

Can't say, Ive heard alot of bad about them.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 2, 2008
#30
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #30
ford302redneck said:
You didn't like Kooks?

Can't say, Ive heard alot of bad about them.
Click to expand...

When talking about 94-95 application

1) Kooks hang VERY low

2) They usually leak at the slip joints

From everything I've seen about these headers ..........
they are more of a race type header

I've seen peeps gripe about 1 & 2 for a good many years now
but
They do make power

Grady
 

ford302redneck

Member
Jul 28, 2007
85
0
6
Hartsville, SC
Feb 2, 2008
#31
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #31
final5-0 said:
When talking about 94-95 application

1) Kooks hang VERY low

2) They usually leak at the slip joints

From everything I've seen about these headers ..........
they are more of a race type header

I've seen peeps gripe about 1 & 2 for a good many years now
but
They do make power

Grady
Click to expand...

Thanks. I thought bout buying some. But there kinda costly.

Also, do you have AIM, if so PM me your s/n.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Feb 3, 2008
#32
  • Feb 3, 2008
  • #32
autumn_again said:
...i dont mind so much buying parts again, what can i do if i find one part that works better with one another besides suck it up and dish out the money.
Click to expand...

It's inevitable. Just consider it a down payment on the new parts.

Check out this thread: http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=843771
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 3, 2008
#33
  • Feb 3, 2008
  • #33
Methodical said:
It's inevitable. Just consider it a down payment on the new parts.

Check out this thread: http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=843771
Click to expand...

yep, read that a while back. going to read it again tonight though. it gives mea good idea of what not to buy haha.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
956
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 7:02 PM
AeroCoupe
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
362
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?