• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What Octane gas does everyone run?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jekyl
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
May 21, 2005
#21
  • May 21, 2005
  • #21
Ive said this so many times but ill say it again....

Unless you require higher octane (high compression, advanced timing, boost) than you are just wasting money and partly losing performance.

The idea is to run the lowest octane possible without detonation. Higher octanes are more resistant to burn. 87 is more combustable than 93+ etc. etc.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
May 21, 2005
#22
  • May 21, 2005
  • #22
Aliate X said:
Ive said this so many times but ill say it again....

Unless you require higher octane (high compression, advanced timing, boost) than you are just wasting money and partly losing performance.

The idea is to run the lowest octane possible without detonation. Higher octanes are more resistant to burn. 87 is more combustable than 93+ etc. etc.
Click to expand...


Ahhhhhhhh... a voice of reason!!!

Yeah... I get tired of repeating the same message. Seem like this topic pops up monthly.
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
May 21, 2005
#23
  • May 21, 2005
  • #23
I used to run 87 all the time, never had a problem with it. But now I just need 93. I can't let it ping at 12psi.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 21, 2005
#24
  • May 21, 2005
  • #24
Daggar said:
Ahhhhhhhh... a voice of reason!!!

Yeah... I get tired of repeating the same message. Seem like this topic pops up monthly.
Click to expand...
no actually Jamie is the voice of reason.

and you meant this topic pops up daily, not monthly, right?

I also get tired of repeating myself. Jrichker is the smartest guy on this board (storing pat replies).
 
Q

qplk11

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
82
0
0
Maryland
May 21, 2005
#25
  • May 21, 2005
  • #25
Loco5.0 said:
This should be in 5.0 talk not tech.

I run 93
Click to expand...
Come on!! Let's not get technical here!
BTW Bone stock and run 87 til the new engine goes in.
 

runningmole

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
1,127
0
36
San Diego, CA
May 22, 2005
#26
  • May 22, 2005
  • #26
91
 

slo65

New Member
May 26, 2003
448
0
0
Southern California
May 22, 2005
#27
  • May 22, 2005
  • #27
91 here.... but its california gas.... so that makes it like.... 80something.. 2 maybe the way i see it is... running 87 is maybe 20 cents difference.... sooo..... if i get like 10 gallons thats what... 2 dollars?.... that doesnt get u much
 

twolo4u2c2

5 Year Member
Apr 10, 2003
330
6
29
reading, PA
May 22, 2005
#28
  • May 22, 2005
  • #28
88_GT_5_oh said:
i run 91..... for the extra $5 i'll take the little extra insurance.

sad part is i just paid $40 for 40 liters of gas (in canada its sold by the liter)
so bassically it cost me $3.81 for a gallon ($3.02 US dollars a gallon for gas)
Click to expand...


holy crap!!!!
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 22, 2005
#29
  • May 22, 2005
  • #29
Daggar and AliateX are correct - absolutely a waste of money to run more octane than you need to prevent detonation on a car without knock sensors - and that's ours.

Run as low an octane as you can. The lower the octane, the easier it ignites and the quicker it burns. And, duh, it's cheaper. Mine runs just fine with 18 degrees btdc initial timing; 34 degrees total in by 2800 rpm on 87 octane.
 

Xterminator03

Member
Sep 23, 2004
157
0
16
NEW YORK
May 23, 2005
#30
  • May 23, 2005
  • #30
I run 89
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 23, 2005
#31
  • May 23, 2005
  • #31
I run 87. I run as low octane as I need. I tried all the others and then I learned about the thermodynamics of fuel and burn rates and decided that was a waste of money.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 23, 2005
#32
  • May 23, 2005
  • #32
The Thermodynamics of Fuel - dude, I saw them in concert back in '73 at the Fox Theatre in Atlanta.....it was awesome....
 

dlaul01

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
169
0
0
May 23, 2005
#33
  • May 23, 2005
  • #33
I run 89 i only have few mods i dont think i should be running 91. I dont know though nothing is wrong with my car with the 87.

mod list
Off Road H-pipe, MSD blaster coil, BBK chrome intake pipe, BBK underdrive pulleys, electric fans, short shifter, Ford Motorsport Plug Wires, new raditor
 

88_GT_5_oh

Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan
Jul 4, 2004
1
0
1
WPG/MB/CA
May 23, 2005
#34
  • May 23, 2005
  • #34
twolo4u2c2 said:
holy crap!!!!
Click to expand...


your telling me


also i couldn't remember if i seenit above but whats the reason that ethanol is not very good?
 

ALMOSTFINISHED

Member
Jan 8, 2004
315
0
17
Westchester County NY
May 23, 2005
#35
  • May 23, 2005
  • #35
I run 91 during the fall winter and early spring, once it gets a bit warmer out I run 93 so it doesn't ping from the higher ambient temp.

Nick
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
May 23, 2005
#36
  • May 23, 2005
  • #36
I only run 93. Couple extra bucks for a piece of mind, and now with the boost, i dont want to take any chances.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
May 24, 2005
#37
  • May 24, 2005
  • #37
Michael Yount said:
Daggar and AliateX are correct - absolutely a waste of money to run more octane than you need to prevent detonation on a car without knock sensors - and that's ours.

Run as low an octane as you can. The lower the octane, the easier it ignites and the quicker it burns. And, duh, it's cheaper. Mine runs just fine with 18 degrees btdc initial timing; 34 degrees total in by 2800 rpm on 87 octane.
Click to expand...

All true, I tuned it on 89 and run it on the same! I also run 18 degrees of timing with no issues. Why run more octane when it wont help anything!
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
May 24, 2005
#38
  • May 24, 2005
  • #38
People tend to think you get what you pay for. Not always so. If you do your research and understand whats going on, then you'll get your money worth. Running a higher octane can also decrease HP and increase emmissions. I used to work at a gas station and it's so funny to see people request for anything other than regular 87. I just laugh at thier stupidity, not like I could argue with them you know.....anyways just understand what you are doing before you do it...
 
1

1Bdazzstang

New Member
May 8, 2005
19
0
0
Orlando
May 24, 2005
#39
  • May 24, 2005
  • #39
I run 93. My wife drove my car one time and put 87 in it and it ran like total crap. That will never happen again.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
257
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
164
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
843
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Fox What gas do you run in your foxbody?
  • Mindseye007
  • May 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 19, 2024
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?