• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Wheel weight.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisXoxide2
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2004
C

ChrisXoxide2

Banned
Feb 27, 2004
45
0
0
Jun 20, 2004
#1
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #1
I'm running 17x10.5 Black Bullitts and Im worried they are a little on the heavy side and just slowing me down.

What do you all think of wheels such as the 17x9 Ultralite Steedas , or any other lightweight rim? Or is it worth the money to get a set of 15 inch rims that don't weigh much just for track use?

Isn't each pound on the drivetrain line about 10X more "heavy" compared to other weight on the car? For instance, I'm thinking about putting an AL driveshaft, and its 6 lbs lighter. Since its a drivetrain component, I figure that is worth about 60lbs in weight savings. However, my wheels are very heavy compared to what else I could probably find, is it worth it? I'm happy with the wheels otherwise, I just think 17x10.5 is probably a little on the heavy side compared to what else I could get.
 

Screwed2V

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,255
1
0
Misery
Jun 20, 2004
#2
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #2
One word-Bogarts.
 

955.0HO

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2001
339
0
0
St. Louis
Jun 20, 2004
#3
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #3
theres a thread on modular depot with just about every wheel and its weight.

to be honest the steeda ultra lites are like 5 lbs lighter, max. Now 5 times 4 is 20, you would be losing some weight but not a WHOLE lot

i would just get some 15 in with some nice tires for the track
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 20, 2004
#4
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #4
I also have the 17X10.5 bullitt rims. I am going to get a set of 15X8 prostars for the track with some ET streets on them.
 
C

ChrisXoxide2

Banned
Feb 27, 2004
45
0
0
Jun 20, 2004
#5
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #5
well, multiplying 5 pounds on both back rims... thats 100lbs weight savings or am I wrong?

I can't even remember where I remember reading that driveline weight is 10X more worthwhile to cut away at.
 
J

Jake795

New Member
May 19, 2004
110
0
0
Jun 20, 2004
#6
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #6
From what i've read and heard, a good rule of thumb is for every 100 lbs of sprung weight you lose, you drop about .1 off your ET and for every 10 lbs of unsprung weight(roating mass on the drive train) you drop .1 off 1/4 mile times. So going by that i would think that you are right in that driveline weight loss is worth 10 times body weight loss. Just my .02
 

Stallion

Banned
Dec 16, 2002
86
0
0
home, finnally
Jun 20, 2004
#7
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #7
absolutly guys!! rotational mass is slowing down cars a lot more than the other factors. its why the sport compact market has put a lot into lighter smaller fly wheels and lighter brake disks. they see a greater gain than with changing a hood to carbon fiber. It makes them faster than other weight loss techniques, just like were seeing.
 

WLD_WST

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
620
0
17
Philly
Jun 20, 2004
#8
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #8
Well since you don't want the wheels anymore, I need some
 
C

ChrisXoxide2

Banned
Feb 27, 2004
45
0
0
Jun 20, 2004
#9
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #9
hahahah... I like them for daily driving, they are mean looking wheels, I'm thinking a great way to speed my car up at the track would be to get some lightweight smaller wheels and good rubber. good for probably 3 or 4 tenths....

I just want to see what things I can do to hopefully see 12.99 with my 00 vert once I put the NX 100 shot in.
 

WLD_WST

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
620
0
17
Philly
Jun 20, 2004
#10
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #10
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1877
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
544
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
624
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
294
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?