• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

which heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter triostang
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2004

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#1
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #1
i want to get afr heads but i dont really know much about this.. which am i supposed to get for a 72, 302ci

64cc/stud mount rockers
58cc/stud mount rockers
or
64cc/pedestal rockers???? whats the difference?

heres what i saw

http://www.proficientperformance.co...Category_Code=afr_heads_ford_street_185_legal
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Jan 22, 2004
#2
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #2
185 afr's too big for 302 unless force injected or really healthy cam, carb intake combo is used.

I'd go with stud for adjustabilty

or pedestal for easyness.

cc's depends on what kind of compression you plan on running. You need to match it up to your pistons and gasket tickness. 58cc's would yield higher compression than 64 cc's.

Hope this answers your question.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jan 22, 2004
#3
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #3
higher the cc the lower your compresion will be. higher compression=loss in hp. go with the 58's!

afr 165's are great for a mild street car and 185's are good for high rpm hp.

stud mount are adjustable and pedestal yu just tighten down.... hard to explain....wait for another reply.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Jan 22, 2004
#4
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #4
Forget AFR. Look at Quality, Quality, Quality.

Been using Edelbrock RPM's at the track for a couple of years with no problems.

These heads will give you plenty of power.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#5
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #5
have a holley 750, and airgap intake, but im still shopping around for a cam i just dont know which.... any of them might fit then? its just that the car is not finished and theres a supercharger in the future for it, havent dyno'd it and im still looking for a forged 347 kit, and plan on getting the compression around 8 or 9 i just wanna have much high of compression so i should go with 64cc's then? (lower compression?)
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Jan 22, 2004
#6
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #6
Man you need to make up your mind on what you want. Then buy. Don't be like me and be stuck with a bunch of performance parts.

185's and that stuff you have for a 302 just doesn't seem good. Carb is ok needs a single plane manifold i.e. vic jr. Cam nice and healthy. lots of duration and lift.

You need lower compression for a supercharger. with a 347 NA the 185's will be great but the 205's will be better if going blown.

I'd suggest vic jr's for your set up. I was going to get them with my chp 347 and the engine was only a few miles away when I said I didn't want it anymore.

going cobra dohc myself.
 

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Jan 22, 2004
#7
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #7
yes 205's seem better but they are race heads and im staying street and will drive it regularly
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Jan 23, 2004
#8
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #8
Do yourself a favor and get the AFR 165's, a Weiand Xcellerator intake and a Holley 650 double pumper. Match it with a good performance cam and some gears. You'll have a very fast and streetable combination.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 23, 2004
#9
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #9
[QUOTE='69Stang]
1/4 mile ET: 12.51 @ 115.89 MPH
60 foot: 2.008 (ouch)
[/QUOTE]
I wasn't thinking "ooch", I was thinking screeeeeeeech!

Nice ET though
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Jan 23, 2004
#10
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #10
Edbert said:
I wasn't thinking "ooch", I was thinking screeeeeeeech!

Nice ET though
Click to expand...

LOL, yea, that’s accurate. The last time I was at the track I spun the tires all the way down the track. Let me tell you it is a weird feeling going down the track at over a 100 mph and the tires are spinning.

On the next run my buddy spun them so hard in between gear shifts that he lost control and crossed over into the other lane!

Needless to say my car is getting a traction upgrade with a set of Cal-Tracs or Comp Engineering Slide-a-links. I just want to transfer the power and get the ET’s to match the MPH.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
642
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
B
SN95 New Heads
  • Blakeknight
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
901
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
G
Anyone Extrude Hone or Flow Bench Speed Pro Heads?
  • giddyup306v1.1
  • Mar 1, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
10
Views
476
Fox Engine Swaparoo Mar 29, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?