• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Which intake for a nearly stock '94 GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MG-70
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

MG-70

New Member
Aug 20, 2006
10
0
0
MD
Aug 24, 2006
#1
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #1
I'm thinking of getting a stock, remanufactured, engine and was wondering which aftermarket intake would give me the best bang for the buck. The mild mods I have include K&N, 9mm wires, MSD 6A, MSD Blaster coil, FRPP stainless shorties, Bassani stainless X w/cats, and Bassani stainless cat-back and I don't plan on doing much else except maybe a larger MAF sensor and small stuff like that, if the motor asks for it.

So, look for used GT40 intake(s), stick with a new or used Edelbrock Performer, or is there anything else out there I should consider that's bolt-on, not custom-made? I've searched and found mainly recommendations for those two but can't tell the difference in performance for my particular application. Also, have no idea how to inspect a compatible, used, GT40 piece or how it can be ruined on disassembly or hard-use.

Also, if you know it, let me know if it'll fit under the regular hood with oem braces, etc.

Your thoughts are appreciated.

TIA
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 24, 2006
#2
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #2
I would pick up a 94/95 Cobra intake and have it ported (by tmoss, if he is still doing that).

As for used intakes, watch for cracks on the ears where the upper bolts to the lower, or stripped threads on those bolt holes. The latter can be easily fixed with a helicoil, the former will require a welder who can do aluminum.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Aug 24, 2006
#3
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #3
My suggestion is Trick Flow street heat. It help mine out a bit when it was close to stock. On another note, did you notice a difference after installing your MSD? Thx.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 24, 2006
#4
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #4
Rootus said:
I would pick up a 94/95 Cobra intake and have it ported (by tmoss, if he is still doing that).

As for used intakes, watch for cracks on the ears where the upper bolts to the lower, or stripped threads on those bolt holes. The latter can be easily fixed with a helicoil, the former will require a welder who can do aluminum.
Click to expand...
+1
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Aug 24, 2006
#5
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #5
I really like my Explorer intake. Helped out quit a bit on the top end and had no negative effect on the bottom end torque. With this intake I went from a 14.469s to 14.103s 1/4ET in similar 90* weather days at the track. These intakes can be had for pretty low $$$.
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Aug 24, 2006
#6
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #6
yeah, i got an explorer intake with a ported lower, works nicely, went from solid 9.8's to 9.5's-9.6's in the 1/8th on a pretty much stock car
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Aug 24, 2006
#7
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #7
edelbrtock performer, trickflow street heat, cobra intake, gt40 intake, explorer intake.. Whatever you can find for a good deal, all of these intakes will do well on a basically stock 5.0
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 24, 2006
#8
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #8
A used cobra would be what you're looking for. No need to port it at all.
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Aug 24, 2006
#9
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #9
Well your in luck I just happen to have a edel performer that I just took off of my cobra thats going up for sale this week. Ohh and I would say you would want a cobra, explorer, or edel performer. The Edel flows better stock for stock. I liked it but decided to go with the rpm intake because my car spins up to 6500 - 6800 rpm's and the performer couldnt keep up past 6000.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 24, 2006
#10
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #10
yellow1995Cobra said:
edelbrtock performer, trickflow street heat, cobra intake, gt40 intake, explorer intake.. Whatever you can find for a good deal, all of these intakes will do well on a basically stock 5.0
Click to expand...



Grady
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Aug 24, 2006
#11
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #11
you want the kenne bell upper with a gt40 lower
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 24, 2006
#12
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #12
bimmertech said:
you want the kenne bell upper with a gt40 lower
Click to expand...
I changed my mine I like this idea better
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Aug 25, 2006
#13
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #13
did you notice a difference after installing your MSD?
 

MG-70

New Member
Aug 20, 2006
10
0
0
MD
Aug 25, 2006
#14
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #14
Man, just as I thought, no clear answer on what's best even given the application. I've contacted Tmoss for his recommendation but it seems as it's just a ported oem lower intake (as per his corral reply to similar post), which is a lot cheaper than an aftermarket (and looks oem, which to me is a good thing).

Pokageek, yes, I did notice a difference after the 6A and coil, though it's hard to describe in layman's terms...seemed as if the spark was stronger and longer and really noticeable when, say, right before downshifting. It was an extremely easy install, the hardest part being a custom made bracket for holding the box itself. Everything is reversible with one quick connection (good for diagnosing other stuff) and the oem parts all stay in their place. When I installed it I was less versed in diagnosing ignition-related problems; it turned out to be a $5 ignition pickup coil under the distributor plate, but by that time a lot of parts had been upgraded/replaced.

Thanks again for the suggestions!
 

MG-70

New Member
Aug 20, 2006
10
0
0
MD
Aug 25, 2006
#15
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #15
double post

double post
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Aug 25, 2006
#16
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #16
Why I went street heat:

1 - I don't have enough money/time to do a complete engine at once. I am doing it piecemeal. I won't be modifying the engine to the point where anything bigger is necessary for a while.

2 - The street heat and the track heat share the same lower, the track heat just has shorter runners. When I am ready to step up to more rpms, it takes about 45 minutes to swap an upper intake!!

3 - My eventual plan is a track heat upper with a ported lower.

4 - The eddie performer is a great piece but I don't think you can just swap on an RPM2 upper. They both have different lowers.

5 - I was thinking Cobra all the way till I learned about the expandability of the TFS system.

Adam
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Aug 25, 2006
#17
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #17
Black95GTS said:
Why I went street heat:

1 - I don't have enough money/time to do a complete engine at once. I am doing it piecemeal. I won't be modifying the engine to the point where anything bigger is necessary for a while.

2 - The street heat and the track heat share the same lower, the track heat just has shorter runners. When I am ready to step up to more rpms, it takes about 45 minutes to swap an upper intake!!

3 - My eventual plan is a track heat upper with a ported lower.

4 - The eddie performer is a great piece but I don't think you can just swap on an RPM2 upper. They both have different lowers.

5 - I was thinking Cobra all the way till I learned about the expandability of the TFS system.

Adam
Click to expand...

Your right the edel RPM II lower is different than the performer, however the regular RPM uses the same lower as the performer, and most of us with the stock shortblock wont benefit from the RPM II in stockish form. Now if he were to say that he will be doing a H/C/I or blower or both I would recommend the RPM II. Look at my combo, I will be running the regular RPM, for the simple fact that I do not believe I need more with where im spinning my motor.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Aug 25, 2006
#18
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #18
WHITE94COBRA said:
Your right the edel RPM II lower is different than the performer, however the regular RPM uses the same lower as the performer, and most of us with the stock shortblock wont benefit from the RPM II in stockish form. Now if he were to say that he will be doing a H/C/I or blower or both I would recommend the RPM II. Look at my combo, I will be running the regular RPM, for the simple fact that I do not believe I need more with where im spinning my motor.
Click to expand...

I would agree with you except the RPM is no longer in production.

It's either performer or RPM 2.

Adam
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 25, 2006
#19
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #19
Black95GTS said:
I would agree with you except the RPM is no longer in production.

It's either performer or RPM 2.

Adam
Click to expand...


You can thank the outsourced typhoon manifold for that
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Aug 25, 2006
#20
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #20
Black95GTS said:
I would agree with you except the RPM is no longer in production.

It's either performer or RPM 2.

Adam
Click to expand...

I got lucky then.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
576
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
258
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
SN95 on3 Turbo w/ Pimpxs on stock '95 gt
  • Swizzy
  • Apr 29, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2024
limp
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?