• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which Intake Manifold To Run ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PlzgoEz
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

PlzgoEz

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
17
0
0
Nov 6, 2006
#1
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #1
I am currectly building an engine right now, and everything is done except the intake. I'm stuck on what for intake to go with.

Heres the combo to help you figure out whats best for it.

306ci Forged Bottom end
11.5.1 Compression
Lunati Hydralic Roller Cam (242/252 Duration @0.050) (560/576 Lift)
1.6 Roller Rockers
AFR 205cc Heads (unported)
75mm Throttle Body
24lb injectors

I have a GT40 lower intake laying in my garage. I seen alot of "Box" upper plenums for the GT40. If I were to port-match the GT40 to the 205cc heads and get a box upper plenum would it make the same or more power over the trickflow R or edelbrock victor. This motor will be reving to 6500 + RPMS. I'm not looking for good low end torque, just an all out high horsepower screamer.

Also I heard that single nozzle nitrous systems at 150+ shots aren't effecient with a long runner intake. Would my nitrous system benifit from a Box upper plenum? It is a Nitrous Express Single Nozzle Wet System good up to a 300 shot.
 
I

iwearpro

New Member
Jun 18, 2006
9
0
1
Nov 6, 2006
#2
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #2
Edelbrock rpm2 nough said
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Nov 6, 2006
#3
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #3
iwearpro said:
Edelbrock rpm2 nough said
Click to expand...

umm... why you say that? thats a great intake for a 331/347 with that compression, but with 185 heads, NOT 205s.

vic jr.
 
P

PlzgoEz

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
17
0
0
Nov 6, 2006
#4
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #4
Which would be the better intake for my application?

Trickflow R (not the box one)
Edelbrock Victor 5.0
 

90

Active Member
Sep 24, 2006
0
1
43
Michigan insane asylum
Nov 7, 2006
#5
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #5
N8Miller said:
vic jr.
Click to expand...



Agreed...... nough said!
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 7, 2006
#6
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #6
you'd have to port the GT40 lower to get it to flow the 305cfm those heads flow @.600" of lift and then it would work with the box upper - I'd use the TF box or BBK box. Your comment about "high HP screamer" leads you more to a box over a long runner intake, but at 6,500 that's not really "screamer" rpm. Both types would work for you.
 

1Bad88notch

New Member
Oct 4, 2005
62
0
0
Leesburg,FL
Nov 7, 2006
#7
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #7
I'd go with the victor jr. intake. Bye the way why did you put so big of head on your motor the afr 205's are recommended for the 331&up. I would of went with the 185's thats just my opinion.
 

donsbad68

Immensely Educated
Jan 4, 2003
838
0
0
Oklahoma
Nov 7, 2006
#8
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #8
big heads and a touch too small injector for that large of nitrous
 
S

silverbulletGT

New Member
Nov 21, 2002
37
0
0
FL
Nov 7, 2006
#9
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #9
donsbad68 said:
big heads and a touch too small injector for that large of nitrous
Click to expand...


He will be fine with the 24's he is running wet nitrous. I would go with the Vic Jr
 
P

PlzgoEz

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
17
0
0
Nov 7, 2006
#10
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #10
Would the AFR 185s work better than the 205 that I have.

BTW: I plan on building a 408 stroker with a Paxton Novi 2000 making 20+ psi down the road, so this way I have heads that will flow enough for that motor and i dont have to buy new ones.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 7, 2006
#11
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #11
you have a 306 with 205 heads and a decent cam - that combo is begging for rpm you won't give it for now I gather - unless the "6,500+" means more than I think. For that reason, the long runner intake is gonna make this combo more useful for now. A Victor Jr is not a long runner - and it won't work on a 408 all that well depending on rpm once again. A box might - if your going to give this combo some rpm, then the Victor or a box will work better over a RPMII or equivalent. Your trying to make this and that work for now and later.........
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Nov 8, 2006
#12
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #12
TRS-R intake for ur 306, Victor will not fit under a stock hood. R is good from 2500-7500, Victor 3500-7500.

IMO, the AFR 205's will be too small for a stout 408.

The cam s/b designed around the cfm flow of the heads and intake among other things.

I would do the new TFS Track heat cnc'd 205's - flow 300/220 @ .500 lift, TFS-R intake and a custom cam from Cam Motion, FTI or Jay Allen.

302 parts do not work well on 347 and 408 strokers.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Nov 8, 2006
#13
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #13
yes i would say to get the power out of those heads on a 306 your going to have to rev it. the victor is where i would be looking. the 205 will work nicely on the 408 stroker. flip through any mustang mag and they run that head all the time with 500+ hp off the crank. however you will be buying a new intake for the 408 because the 302 will ot swap to the 351w.
 

$uperstang

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
476
1
0
Detroit, MI
Nov 8, 2006
#14
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #14
vic jr.
 
P

PlzgoEz

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
17
0
0
Nov 8, 2006
#15
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #15
All I want to make is at least 325 RWHP. Do you think it very likely that I will make that with the AFR 205 heads, lunati cam and a victor 5.0 intake?
 

Cwalk

New Member
Sep 25, 2006
78
0
0
Virginia Beach, Va
Nov 8, 2006
#16
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #16
If you plan on staying fuel injected. I'd go with the Performer RPM II.
 
P

PlzgoEz

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
17
0
0
Nov 8, 2006
#17
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #17
Which combo would make more horsepower at 6500 RPMs

AFR 185 Heads
Lunati Cam (242/252 Duration @50) (560/576 Lift) (3000-7000 RPM Range)
Edelbrock RPM ll Intake

Or

AFR 205 Heads
Same Lunati Cam
Edelbrock Victor 5.0 Intake

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!
 

1Bad88notch

New Member
Oct 4, 2005
62
0
0
Leesburg,FL
Nov 8, 2006
#18
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #18
Are you planning to upgrade your ignition because if your planning for 6500 plus rpms your rev limter for stock i think is 6250 rpms
 
P

PlzgoEz

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
17
0
0
Nov 8, 2006
#19
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #19
The ignition is a MSD 6AL Igntion w/2 Step, MSD Pro-Billet Distributor, MSD TFI Coil, MSD Plug Wires.

The Factory 6250 Rev Limiter Has Allready Been Removed.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 8, 2006
#20
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #20
The AFR 185 combo is the one I'd suggest of the two....
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
R
  • Locked
66 Mustang Fastback Pro Touring/Street
  • raw23062
  • Sep 21, 2010
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
10
Views
9K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Jun 27, 2011
raw23062
R
P
330 RWHP On Nitrous vs. 330 RWHP N/A
  • PlzgoEz
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2006
86bluecobra
8
P
How Much RWHP Will This Combo Produce?
  • PlzgoEz
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
641
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 9, 2006
stangjunkie
P
How Much RWHP Will This Combo Produce?
  • PlzgoEz
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
541
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 9, 2006
Daggar
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?