• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Which intake, mostly stock engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fopar
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2007
F

Fopar

Member
Apr 1, 2007
178
0
16
San Marcos, CA
Jul 29, 2007
#1
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #1
What would be a better intake, 94-95 cobra intake or edelbrock performer.... or edelbrock performer RPM(II)?

motor might have a cam and computer might have a chip .
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Jul 29, 2007
#2
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #2
what are your goals?? just a intake swap?
 
F

Fopar

Member
Apr 1, 2007
178
0
16
San Marcos, CA
Jul 29, 2007
#3
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #3
yep just intake... so which will put up better #'s, edelbrock intakes or cobra?
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Jul 29, 2007
#4
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #4
i like edelbrock ...and a 93 cobra seems to do better then the 94-95 ones do...there is a sticky at the top of this section with intakes and all that on there check it out
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 29, 2007
#5
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #5
If you have the stock gt E7 heads the best bang for the buck will be sending your stock lower to Tmoss to get it ported.

Do a search under his name and you will get ALOT of good information/dyno numbers as to why I suggest this.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Jul 29, 2007
#6
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #6
edelbrock performer
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 29, 2007
#7
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #7
I'd rather have the Edel any day
cause
The Cobra runs outta breath at 5K

You R E A L L Y should think long and hard about your plans for
that Stang in this case

IIRC ... With the Edel line these days since they dropped the RPM

You can't just switch the uppers any more

Someone please confirm if I got this wrong

Grady
 
F

Fopar

Member
Apr 1, 2007
178
0
16
San Marcos, CA
Jul 29, 2007
#8
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #8
the intake is going on, thats it. I don't intend to do any other swaps...

So anyone have dyno numbers on this kinda stuff? Surely people do stock motor bolt-on tests .
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
559
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Jul 29, 2007
#9
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #9
blksn955.o said:
If you have the stock gt E7 heads the best bang for the buck will be sending your stock lower to Tmoss to get it ported.

Do a search under his name and you will get ALOT of good information/dyno numbers as to why I suggest this.
Click to expand...

+1

You buy a used stock intake for a few bux and send it to TMoss. When you get it back, do the swap and sell the one you have on there now.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 29, 2007
#10
  • Jul 29, 2007
  • #10
I would contact Tmoss first as sometimes he has cores already ported ready to go out...you just send him yours and he returns you an already ported one. Talk about turn around time...

If all your going to do is an intake...do a search on the Tmoss name. He has a link in his sig with dyno graphs, pics, first hand accounts of users as well as flow rates for comparable intakes. The lower is the bottle neck of your combo.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 30, 2007
#11
  • Jul 30, 2007
  • #11
If you like the looks of the Cobra or Performer, you can use them as they both flow right at the same 210cfm in stock form. Porting the stock lower intake on yours will get flow up to 190-200cfm range which is way more than the 150-160cfm stock heads flow. Either will work for you.
 
F

Fopar

Member
Apr 1, 2007
178
0
16
San Marcos, CA
Aug 9, 2007
#12
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #12
well no offense to T-moss but theres alot more to intakes than just flow numbers and smoothing transitions. Things like runner cross section, runner length, plenum volume etc all have a great effect on accoustical characteristics. So while I don't doubt he can get more flow out of a stock intake and perhaps pick up a little power it's not the same as a GT-40 style or other performance oriented intake that was designed to be such.

So... Is the cobra intake comparable to an edelbrock on a stockish bottom end?
 
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Aug 9, 2007
#13
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #13
if you're determined to go aftermarket....edel makes good stuff.

You may want to look into the streetheat as well. I'd post numbers and what not but I'm blown so it's kinda moot
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Aug 9, 2007
#14
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #14
my choice... ported and polished.

 

Attachments

  • mustang8-9-07002.webp
    71.1 KB · Views: 95

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 9, 2007
#15
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #15
Fopar said:
well no offense to T-moss but theres alot more to intakes than just flow numbers and smoothing transitions. Things like runner cross section, runner length, plenum volume etc all have a great effect on accoustical characteristics. So while I don't doubt he can get more flow out of a stock intake and perhaps pick up a little power it's not the same as a GT-40 style or other performance oriented intake that was designed to be such.

So... Is the cobra intake comparable to an edelbrock on a stockish bottom end?
Click to expand...

I'm well aware of all that - visit my website read some tech and look around and download the "helpful calculations" spreadsheet in the download section as all that stuff is there. A properly ported stoc intake will flow 200cfm and make more torque/power below 4,500 rpm than a stock Cobra. They have made 280-295RWHP and torque in the 320-330lb-ft range - dyno sheets are in the photo secction. That's a lot more than "pick up a little power".......and when looking at average power over the rpm range it is "the same as a GT40 - style" intake although the GT40 will make more power above 4,500 (typicall noses over ~5,500) but less below that.

Stock for Stock, the GT40/Cobra and Performeer are essentially the same.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Aug 9, 2007
#16
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #16
IF you keep the stock heads then the cobra are all you need... I went cobra due to price... no intake elbow needed, cheap to buy... I think I spent $250 total for mine incuding gaskets, oil, a couple o-rings for the injectors, EVERYTHING....

And it was a nice hit in the pants...

Now I am wanting more...
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#17
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #17
the typhoon intake is the best bang for buck out of both of those intakes. its basically a eddy rpm intake. if you can do some minor gasket matching yourself then its the same. i have one on my stock bottom end and stock heads with stock headers. i went 24lb injectors w/ 65mm tb and 76mm mass air. i noticed a huge difference in power especially midrange and high end.
 

MysteryMachine

Active Member
Jun 21, 2003
1,835
2
39
Parkesburg, PA
Aug 9, 2007
#18
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #18
i would go with the performer or TFS Streetheat at the least. That way if you decide you want more you can grow into them a little more then the cobra. There been a lot of guys on here that upgraded from a cobra to a tfs. I have a train of thought go big at first then you only gotta buy stuff once lol
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Aug 9, 2007
#19
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #19
tmoss said:
Porting the stock lower intake on yours will get flow up to 190-200cfm range which is way more than the 150-160cfm stock heads flow.
Click to expand...

The deal's even sweeter if you port the stock E7's as well as the lower intake, as I found out last week. The engine pulls well up to the 5350rpm shift point but it's the improvement in low/medium rpm torque that really planted a big on my face.
I like torque and the dyno graphs on Tom's own site show that a ported stock intake makes more torque than the Cobra up to 4200rpm. That's a difference you can definitely feel when you're trying to overtake slower vehicles on the highway in overdrive with the engine spinning at less than 2500rpm.
Something to consider if your car's a daily driven street machine rather than a drag queen.
 
F

Fopar

Member
Apr 1, 2007
178
0
16
San Marcos, CA
Aug 9, 2007
#20
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #20
i'd like to go with the typhoon but it has no CARB # so .

What times are you guys running with the cobra intake or TFS?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
692
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
190
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?