• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Which is faster and more fun?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aNotchAbove
  • Start date Start date Nov 13, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Nov 14, 2007
#21
  • Nov 14, 2007
  • #21
If you were to put a turbo on it, odds are you are going to be doing more engine maintaince sooner than you want. Such as Head gaskets. Same can go for the supercharger.
Get a Solid HCI setup on the car first, this way all engine gaskets and valvetrain is new.
Nothings worse than putting some boost into the engine, and it blowing oil out of every oriface.
 
B

bentley429

Banned
Nov 25, 2004
528
3
0
Connecticut
Nov 14, 2007
#22
  • Nov 14, 2007
  • #22
2000xp8 said:
If you were to put a turbo on it, odds are you are going to be doing more engine maintaince sooner than you want. Such as Head gaskets. Same can go for the supercharger.
Get a Solid HCI setup on the car first, this way all engine gaskets and valvetrain is new.
Nothings worse than putting some boost into the engine, and it blowing oil out of every oriface.
Click to expand...

But nothing is worse then needing that 30-50 extra rwhp to destroy that evo with bolt ons...
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Nov 14, 2007
#23
  • Nov 14, 2007
  • #23
bentley429 said:
But nothing is worse then needing that 30-50 extra rwhp to destroy that evo with bolt ons...
Click to expand...

A good 300-315rwhp NA foxbody can run low 12's some even run high 11's.
350 aspirated rwhp doesn't do any better.
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Nov 14, 2007
#24
  • Nov 14, 2007
  • #24
Gotta love the ones answering "C" to an "A or B" question

The guy has his plans, he isn't asking for direction
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Nov 15, 2007
#25
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #25
Yeah.... TURBO
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 15, 2007
#26
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #26
Shop the classifieds and do both. I got my strim and gt40 intake for 1200. Spent $1300 for a set of trickflows new, and still have $500 for cam and misc. I will go over the 3K, but not by much I don't think. If I had really shopped for used heads, I would have been under the 3k.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Nov 15, 2007
#27
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #27
HCI for the street. Centrifis take time to build boost and by the tiime they are making max power your speeds will be so high you'll have to slow down. HCI will give you power right off the bat so it will be more efficient on the street. I would go blower in the future though!!
 
A

aNotchAbove

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
75
0
0
Nov 15, 2007
#28
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #28
SVT32VDOHC said:
HCI for the street. Centrifis take time to build boost and by the tiime they are making max power your speeds will be so high you'll have to slow down. HCI will give you power right off the bat so it will be more efficient on the street. I would go blower in the future though!!
Click to expand...

Pretty much what I was looking for. Thanks for the info!
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 15, 2007
#29
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #29
the blower will eventually exceed the stock blocks limits so.....No sense in having the block split and potentially have a rod let go taking out a nice set of cylinder heads
 
B

bentley429

Banned
Nov 25, 2004
528
3
0
Connecticut
Nov 15, 2007
#30
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #30
Modular2v said:
the blower will eventually exceed the stock blocks limits so.....No sense in having the block split and potentially have a rod let go taking out a nice set of cylinder heads
Click to expand...

Exactly, stock longblock and a turbo. Answer "C" is a much better choice in every way...faster for sure, more fun of course.

2000xp8- so....a car that makes more power isnt going to be faster if its hooking the same? Shoot I shoulda just bought a Geo....

ANotchAbove- Seriously, look into a quicktime or b&g kit both are about 3k and will make WAY more power then h/c/i or stock with a blower ever would. The 350 rwhp i said before is just a number plenty of people have gone FAR over the 400 mark with stock E7's and a turbo. If you have to save up a extra $1k to do it right why not? Reguardless if you dont go turbo I guess my vote is for h/c/i
 

408gt91

Member
Apr 29, 2007
114
0
16
N.H.
Nov 15, 2007
#31
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #31
Save more and do both.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Nov 15, 2007
#32
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #32
bentley429 said:
Exactly, stock longblock and a turbo. Answer "C" is a much better choice in every way...faster for sure, more fun of course.

2000xp8- so....a car that makes more power isnt going to be faster if its hooking the same? Shoot I shoulda just bought a Geo....
Click to expand...


Guess you never heard of Peak vs average power.
Dyno queens don't always run the fastest.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Nov 16, 2007
#33
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #33
One nice thing about doing an h/c/i first is that you can run around without a tune (in most cases) as long as you want without having to worry about chucking headgaskets or any of that stuff associated with turbos/blowers.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 16, 2007
#34
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #34
2000xp8 said:
Guess you never heard of Peak vs average power.
Dyno queens don't always run the fastest.
Click to expand...

In what way did he imply that avg power isnt greater than peak power? This whole thread is pointless! What he should do is just throw a turbo on there and have as much power as he wants! No sense in wasting money on an HCI setup when the turbo alone will split the block! I wish i would have dont this to begin with so im just speaking from my own mess ups!
 

KurtPB

Member
May 15, 2006
127
0
17
Lorimor, IA
Nov 16, 2007
#35
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #35
i'm also looking at an lx but with plans of both a twisted wedge TFS h/c/i & vortech blower. from what i've read, that'd result in some good power.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 16, 2007
#36
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #36
KurtPB said:
i'm also looking at an lx but with plans of both a twisted wedge TFS h/c/i & vortech blower. from what i've read, that'd result in some good power.
Click to expand...

YES IT RESULTS IN GOOD POWER BUT The blower alone will make enough power to split the block so why bother with the hci? THATS THE LAST TIME IM GOING TO SAY IT
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 16, 2007
#37
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #37
Modular2v said:
YES IT RESULTS IN GOOD POWER BUT The blower alone will make enough power to split the block so why bother with the hci? THATS THE LAST TIME IM GOING TO SAY IT
Click to expand...


Keep your rpms down, and run a conservative tune. People have kept their bottom end together that way. A friend of mine was on a t trim, spyder intake, victor heads, and a custom cam and never spilt the block. RPM is the number one killer of stock blocks.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 16, 2007
#38
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #38
strtrcr50 said:
Keep your rpms down, and run a conservative tune. People have kept their bottom end together that way. A friend of mine was on a t trim, spyder intake, victor heads, and a custom cam and never spilt the block. RPM is the number one killer of stock blocks.
Click to expand...

maybe you should look at my sig Im trying to keep people from wasting the money i wasted! Some of you still are not understanding the concept that you dont need HCI to get the power that the block is limited to!
 
B

bentley429

Banned
Nov 25, 2004
528
3
0
Connecticut
Nov 16, 2007
#39
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #39
Modular2v said:
In what way did he imply that avg power isnt greater than peak power? This whole thread is pointless! What he should do is just throw a turbo on there and have as much power as he wants! No sense in wasting money on an HCI setup when the turbo alone will split the block! I wish i would have dont this to begin with so im just speaking from my own mess ups!
Click to expand...

Thank-you Modular. I agree it is pointless, and like you said the turbo WILL split the block.

2000xp8- Go find some info proving that a turbo car making 350 rwhp(which is a joke) runs slower then a 300 rwhp h/c/i car because that is a joke. But you are correct, dyno queens dont alway run the fastest but last time I checked this isnt a supra forum?
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 16, 2007
#40
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #40
All I was saying was some do not split the block. My friend's car was low 9's and never split the block. Yes, it's better to build a short block.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
T
Forced Induction On3 turbo on stock 89 with 87K miles --suggestions
  • tank76
  • Aug 2, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 27, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?