• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Which is more important?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CornerCarvin67
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

CornerCarvin67

New Member
Dec 30, 2004
246
0
0
Jan 22, 2008
#1
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #1
Subframe connectors or the strut tower brace?
 

fiveohlxhatch

New Member
Sep 18, 2007
27
0
0
Jan 22, 2008
#2
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #2
I have both but I personally did the SFCs first and added the strut tower brace after. Both made a HUGE difference in their own way but regardless of whether it's a drag car or road racer I think everyone will agree the SFCs are almost a requirement.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 22, 2008
#3
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #3
Subframes hands down. Your entire car twists and flexes in the middle and that's between the front and rear wheels where it'll make the most negative difference. Strut tower bars only help to keep the front end stiff on corners. You'll benefit from subframes in every driving situation but both are a good investment.
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Jan 22, 2008
#4
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #4
frame ties ftw
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,293
17,997
224
Massachusetts
Jan 22, 2008
#5
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #5
SFC's


Get the MM full lenght ones with jacking rails.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Jan 22, 2008
#6
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #6
frame connectors for sure
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Jan 22, 2008
#7
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #7
I dont know if it was mentioned but SFC hands down FTW!
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Jan 22, 2008
#8
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #8
i'm always a +1 on sfc's!!
 

allballsmustang

Member
Mar 31, 2005
174
0
16
Lehigh Valley, PA
Jan 22, 2008
#9
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #9
i dont think anyone mentioned this but go with the sfc's lol
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Jan 22, 2008
#10
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #10
I understand that this won't be a popular opinion....but I say subframe connectors.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Jan 22, 2008
#11
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #11
I have one car with a strut tower brace, one with nothing and one with STB and SFC's. The last one is amazingly more solid feeling than either of the others.
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
3
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Jan 22, 2008
#12
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #12
wow you guys are all wrong... I'd gor with some SFC's for sure...
 
M

MaxTheHooker

New Member
Jan 15, 2008
36
1
0
Jan 22, 2008
#13
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #13
anyone have any suggestions of which ones to get? (please include links if you can!) i was just thinking about this.
 

LS-what?

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
133
0
0
indiana
Jan 23, 2008
#14
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #14
Don't listen to these clowns what do they know go with the SUB-FRAMES

later
 

gruvee87vertgt

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
272
26
28
Chicago, Il
Jan 23, 2008
#15
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #15
Subframes...the weld on kind....ebay got some good ones for 100 bux
 

Nova

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
128
0
0
Jan 23, 2008
#16
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #16
subframes by a mile.
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Jan 23, 2008
#17
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #17
Maximum Motorsports or Steeda full length, weld on. They both come with tq box reinforcements and seat bolt reinforcements.
 

Redeemedsoul

New Member
Sep 4, 2005
70
0
0
Jan 24, 2008
#18
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #18
All the above posts are null and void.

The real answer to your question is the sub frame connectors.

-rS
 

JKidd

Member
Aug 21, 2007
164
3
19
Suffield, CT
Jan 24, 2008
#19
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #19
Gotta buck the trend here and say that chassis reinforcement is over-rated.

I have actually REMOVED parts of the subframe to reduce weight and increase power-to-weight ratio. It's more about removing stuff than adding stuff.

I went full-bore and also removed both front braking systems. Those calipers weigh a freaking TON!!!

I typically run only one quart of oil and only fill the radiator half full of coolant - these are necessary systems otherwise I wouldn't use any (more weight savings!!!).

If you want to go hardcore, remove all the glass (other than the windshield of course - that would be silly).

Good luck!!!
 

fastford91

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
254
1
0
Niagara ,Ontario, Canada
Jan 24, 2008
#20
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #20
i would say those new thingys!..... what are they called? ........SUB-FRAMES!!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
Problems after exhaust install and 02 harness
  • djj62478
  • Jul 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
647
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
371
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
Electrical/engine bay harness questions
  • djj62478
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
336
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
djj62478
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?