• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

which mods which order for 500bhp

  • Thread starter Thread starter 300bhp/ton
  • Start date Start date Sep 21, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Sep 22, 2005
#21
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #21
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Sep 22, 2005
#22
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #22
Dbeck002 said:
500 HP N/A... just get a 351 and be done with it, should be perfectly streetable.
Click to expand...
so does this mean a 302 with 480-500bhp wouldn't be all that streetable?

I've haven't got a 5.0 yet (only found 2 for sale so far, an auto and a vert???)

what would a 302 with rebuilt internals and raised CR with all the bolt ons be like? I'd be prepared to look at a 351 but if the 302 would offer what I want why spend more money.

Realistically, if the car is going to be street driven (not every day, but must be useable) how much BHP should you expect to get from a 302?
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 22, 2005
#23
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #23
300bhp/ton said:
so does this mean a 302 with 480-500bhp wouldn't be all that streetable?

I've haven't got a 5.0 yet (only found 2 for sale so far, an auto and a vert???)

what would a 302 with rebuilt internals and raised CR with all the bolt ons be like? I'd be prepared to look at a 351 but if the 302 would offer what I want why spend more money.

Realistically, if the car is going to be street driven (not every day, but must be useable) how much BHP should you expect to get from a 302?
Click to expand...



To get a 302 to make 500 HP is going to cost you more than to make a 351 make 500HP.

302 N/A 500 hp is out of the question unless you put a lot of money into the block and engine to rev it real high.

A rebuilt 302 with all the goodies, heads, intake and cam, fuel system etc... N/A should make 365HP at the crank. Maybe a little more if you match parts real well. If you boost that then you can definately hit 500 at the crank. But again, a 302 block is weak and is only a matter of time before the block splits at that power level.

A 351 is a stronger block and a better foundation for your goals. A good 351W buildup in my eyes is a bored out 351 (357) and possibly stroked and a good set of heads (AFR205), really good balanced forged rotating assembly and a good matched cam.

In the end youll be spending less money to make a 500 hp engine with the 351 as opposed to the 302. Why do more people like building up 302s? bigger market for the 302 and more people know about the 5.0 as opposed to the 351w. But for anyone that wants to make serious power, 500+, the 351w is the best option.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Sep 22, 2005
#24
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #24
Dbeck002 said:
To get a 302 to make 500 HP is going to cost you more than to make a 351 make 500HP.

302 N/A 500 hp is out of the question unless you put a lot of money into the block and engine to rev it real high.

A rebuilt 302 with all the goodies, heads, intake and cam, fuel system etc... N/A should make 365HP at the crank. Maybe a little more if you match parts real well. If you boost that then you can definately hit 500 at the crank. But again, a 302 block is weak and is only a matter of time before the block splits at that power level.

A 351 is a stronger block and a better foundation for your goals. A good 351W buildup in my eyes is a bored out 351 (357) and possibly stroked and a good set of heads (AFR205), really good balanced forged rotating assembly and a good matched cam.

In the end youll be spending less money to make a 500 hp engine with the 351 as opposed to the 302. Why do more people like building up 302s? bigger market for the 302 and more people know about the 5.0 as opposed to the 351w. But for anyone that wants to make serious power, 500+, the 351w is the best option.
Click to expand...
alright I'm convinced, 351 sounds the better option here.

How realistic would this combo be, as it sounds rather impressive to me:

jadesville said:
My 302 is not highly tuned, it's just a few simple modifications anyone can do in their garage.

I have a 302 that is bored .040 over to make 308ci and it's 5.0L

11:1 compression, forged bottom end, ported th heads, vj intake, isky 304 cam. Just a few simple modifications

My 480hp 302 isn't an engine you can pick up on a shelf, it's unreliable? I'd hate to break it to you, but that's my reliable daily driver engine. It is completely streetable.
Click to expand...
These are some quotes from the same person, and as far as I can tell about the same engine.

However having a look around and from what you guys are saying it sounds like 480bhp from a 302 n/a is more the rarity than the norm. Would this be a correct assumption?

Anyone got any links as where to look at buying a 351 motor. As I'm in the UK I probably won't find one at the scrap yard, so I'd probably look at buying a short motor or block and build it up.

Cheers for your help.
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 22, 2005
#25
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #25
Yes a 480 hp naturally aspirated 302 (308) is rare. And, im sure it would be very unstreetable, cam would have to be a high RPM cam, idle would be high, car would stall often etc...


These companies are generally reliable.

http://www.foxlakeracing.com/index.php?src=gendocs&link=Fox Lake Shortblocks

Call up foxlake and ask them about a 351 or 408 (stroker 351) buildup.

http://www.dssracing.com/

I've heard generally good things about DSS.

http://www.coasthigh.com/Assemblies/Ford/ford_393w.htm

Stroker 351W



This last link looks the most promising. Its a basic 351 stroked out and makes 475 HP.

http://www.musclemotors.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1030
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Sep 22, 2005
#26
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #26
Dbeck002 said:
Yes a 480 hp naturally aspirated 302 (308) is rare. And, im sure it would be very unstreetable, cam would have to be a high RPM cam, idle would be high, car would stall often etc...


These companies are generally reliable.

http://www.foxlakeracing.com/index.php?src=gendocs&link=Fox Lake Shortblocks

Call up foxlake and ask them about a 351 or 408 (stroker 351) buildup.

http://www.dssracing.com/

I've heard generally good things about DSS.

http://www.coasthigh.com/Assemblies/Ford/ford_393w.htm

Stroker 351W



This last link looks the most promising. Its a basic 351 stroked out and makes 475 HP.

http://www.musclemotors.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1030
Click to expand...
Ta.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 22, 2005
#27
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #27
IMO, the ONLY reason to get a N/A 302 to that kind of power is to race in a particular racing class.

RC
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Sep 22, 2005
#28
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #28
How about a bored 302. TW ported heads, ported victor Jr intake, 700 cfm carb, and an isky 304 cam. Rev it to 6800 and your looking at about 480 on California pump gas.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Sep 22, 2005
#29
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #29
This is pretty lame since this thread is directed to mock me.

The engine was built for bracket racing. It ran on 100 octane (pump) and has plenty of mechanical problems when it did. If I was to add all my reciepts, and the previous owner's reciepts, they would be around $7k.

All my remarks towards being simple and streetable was sarcastic. In terms of being streetable, I did, but it's not comfortable.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Sep 23, 2005
#30
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #30
jadesville said:
This is pretty lame since this thread is directed to mock me.

The engine was built for bracket racing. It ran on 100 octane (pump) and has plenty of mechanical problems when it did. If I was to add all my reciepts, and the previous owner's reciepts, they would be around $7k.

All my remarks towards being simple and streetable was sarcastic. In terms of being streetable, I did, but it's not comfortable.
Click to expand...
don't worry yourself this wasn't an attack on you. Just a genuine enquirery about a future project.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Stripped Crank threads and cracked Crank Shaft Ring at end (what is it called?)
  • 69machmike
  • Nov 13, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
313
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2024
89ripper
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?