• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which Rocker Arms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbys9350
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2005

bobbys9350

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
472
0
0
Aug 30, 2005
#1
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #1
ok i have a 93 coupe. 111k miles. pretty much stock except for exhaust and ignition and cold air intake. i got a rocker ticking bad now and instead of just pulling the VC and tightening it i figuire i might as well do roller rockers now. i can transfer them to better heads down the rd. my question is what size should i hget? 1.6 or 1.7? 7/16 stud mount right? and what is the most bad azz rockers out there, ( money is no object, well it is but u know what i mean i was thinking some stainless steel ones from crower. what do you think? THANKS!!!!!!
 

Daniel50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
716
1
0
Discovery Bay, CA
Aug 30, 2005
#2
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #2
id go with a set of 1.7 crane rockers to get the most out of that stock cam and go with a pedestal mount the stud mount is more for aftermarket heads like the afr's
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Aug 30, 2005
#3
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #3
Comp Pro Magnums, I got them on my TFS heads. quality stuff!
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Aug 30, 2005
#4
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #4
I just recieved my 1.7 cobra rockers which are made by Crane so haven"t installed them with my new heads and intake yet.I heard they make a good difference if you plan on keeping the stock cam like I am.I was told they are like half a (relatively mild) cam change for performance gains.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 30, 2005
#5
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #5
I would get some crane/cobra 1.7RR's. I liked mine I had. You will want pedestal mounted ones (stock heads).

Are you sure it is a rocker ticking or your lifter?
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Aug 30, 2005
#6
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #6
Rocker arms usually don't tick. That's usually a lifter that ticks.
 

bobbys9350

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
472
0
0
Aug 30, 2005
#7
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #7
it could be either but im almost positive the rocker is loose. so the crower ones arent any good? i need pedastal mount right? thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
712
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
660
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Resolved Noisy Valvetrain
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2024
PonyGTrider
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
649
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Y
Engine 1994 Ford Mustang Gt Rod Knock/Stuck Lifter
  • yaboity
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
254
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 8, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?