• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

which thermostat do you recommend?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankoman87
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2005
F

frankoman87

New Member
Aug 12, 2005
27
0
0
Denver, CO
Sep 3, 2005
#1
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #1
I've pretty much deducted that I need a new thermostat because my car has been running hotter than normal. It's running a little over the half way mark right around 205 to 210 degrees. I've heard that 190 is standard but I've also heard that some people have used a 180 and gotten good results.

Also, I need to replace my heater core. I know it is a pain in the ass but my mustang did not have an a/c from the factory and I've heard that it's super easy to replace if that's the case. Is it pretty simple to do with a friend and myself??
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Sep 3, 2005
#2
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #2
Nothing less that 180.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Sep 3, 2005
#3
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #3
180
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Sep 3, 2005
#4
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #4
Another 180 vote. If it still runs hot, there are other issues which should be addressed.
The 180 does not fix anything - it simply prolongs the time it takes to reach 210* (random temp picked for an example).

Good luck.
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Sep 3, 2005
#5
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #5
mr gasket 180
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 3, 2005
#6
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #6
Mr gasket 180 here also.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Sep 3, 2005
#7
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #7
I have a Mr Gasket 180... Works perfect, and always opens right at 180... but I would have gone with their 260 degree stat if I could go back.....



















 
D

Deleted member 87397

Sep 3, 2005
#8
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #8
Mr. Gasket 180 all the way. It' will be a long time before you ever have to replace it againg and they are pretty accurate.
 
F

fox_bodies_rule

Member
Apr 17, 2005
34
0
6
Sep 4, 2005
#9
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #9
I will stand by for the flames, but here are some facts. The factory says 190 to 195. There is a coolant temp sending (CTS) unit that talks to the the ECM and is part of the a/f ratio computation. So, at 180 you will run a little richer than if you are at 190 or so, whether there is a performance difference that is dyno proven or not I don't know, I will leave that one in the myth catagory until someone comes up with some factual data. A 180 will NOT fix a cooling problem. Assuming a properly set up cooling system, it will just let the engine run at 180.
 

9350coupe

New Member
May 11, 2005
109
0
0
chicago
Sep 4, 2005
#10
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #10
Another vote for 180
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Sep 4, 2005
#11
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #11
fox_bodies_rule said:
I will stand by for the flames, but here are some facts. The factory says 190 to 195. There is a coolant temp sending (CTS) unit that talks to the the ECM and is part of the a/f ratio computation. So, at 180 you will run a little richer than if you are at 190 or so, whether there is a performance difference that is dyno proven or not I don't know, I will leave that one in the myth catagory until someone comes up with some factual data. A 180 will NOT fix a cooling problem. Assuming a properly set up cooling system, it will just let the engine run at 180.
Click to expand...
Might want to check those facts.
The ECT (or CTS as you call it) needs to see ~178* before the puter goes to full CL fuel trim. A 180* t-stat allows this just fine. Before 180*, the puter can actually lean out the mixture, since the leanness brings temps up a smidge.

As for the rest, that was already said.
 
F

fox_bodies_rule

Member
Apr 17, 2005
34
0
6
Sep 4, 2005
#12
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #12
HISSIN50- I agree with all that you said; about the lean part, you learn something new everyday. The way I understood things is that it ran richer, as in cold start open loop mode, but what you say makes sense, gotta go get the ECM book out again I guess. My point is that at 180 you are very close to going into open loop as the stat cycles back and forth. This may not seem like a big deal for some but it gets below 0 degrees around here and you can definitely get the "cycling" thing going which can cause you to fail emissions if you are scheduled to test in the dead of winter. Call it tolerance stack for the ECT and the stat if you like, so 190 to 195 gives you the extra bandwidth. How do I know? flunked emissions, changed the stat only based on the test results, a great mechanic reading the a/f ratio real time and the fact that I wasn't throwing any codes. Great feedback, thanks!
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Sep 4, 2005
#13
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #13
fox_bodies_rule said:
HISSIN50- I agree with all that you said; about the lean part, you learn something new everyday. The way I understood things is that it ran richer, as in cold start open loop mode, but what you say makes sense, gotta go get the ECM book out again I guess. My point is that at 180 you are very close to going into open loop as the stat cycles back and forth. This may not seem like a big deal for some but it gets below 0 degrees around here and you can definitely get the "cycling" thing going which can cause you to fail emissions if you are scheduled to test in the dead of winter. Call it tolerance stack for the ECT and the stat if you like, so 190 to 195 gives you the extra bandwidth. How do I know? flunked emissions, changed the stat only based on the test results, a great mechanic reading the a/f ratio real time and the fact that I wasn't throwing any codes. Great feedback, thanks!
Click to expand...
I see your point bud. Those temps you quoted are a bit specific (I could counter with the 115* temps we see here). I do know what you mean though (I grew up in Alaska).
There are many who do run two different rated stats in the winter vs summer.
Another thing some folks do is keep the 180 but shroud part of the radiator during the winter. Or let the car idle for a bit before going through the sniffer (in my experience, an idling motor, even in the middle of winter, will get warm eventually).

One thing we need to remember here - this is not black and white with regard to open and closed loop. Within 30-120 seconds of starting the car (most of the time, for most carsiwith HEGO's), the O2's light off. At that point, the ECT provides the puter with info on how much fuel trim is needed for the temps (this is closed loop though - just not full closed loop). But if someone ran at 170* (per the ECT) all day long, fuel economy would not diminish significantly IMHO (esp since we have adaptive strategy).
Most of us run the 180 stats to compensate for 15 year old cooling systems and cars.

I better post this - I have been typing it for 20 mins (with 20 interruptions).
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Sep 4, 2005
#14
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #14
by JT.
 
K

Kerpal

New Member
Aug 9, 2004
400
0
0
Sep 4, 2005
#15
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #15
I'm running the Mr. Gasket 180* stat as well with no problems. With a Griffin 31x19" 2 row rad, stock clutch fan, and a 50/50 coolant mix the stock gauge almost never moves from 1/3 up.
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
Sep 5, 2005
#16
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #16
i run a 180 down from the stock 192', helped my car run a tad cooler, mr gasket thermos rule also! much better than kragen brand
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
509
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
S
Progress Thread severe97's Project Thread!
  • severe97
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
47
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 1, 2025
severe97
S
M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
326
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
280
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
  • Locked
2001 evap core tube support
  • mnky99
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
379
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?