• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

WHICH YEAR 302?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltascrew
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2008

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
Mar 25, 2008
#1
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #1
I am needing a new engine for my 65. I plan to put an AOD tranny on the engine, and want it streetable enough to run my A/C on 200+ mile road trips. I am considering buying a shortblock assembly. Would I be better off buying a shortblock for a 69 model or get a roller block from like an 85-91 model.
I plan on putting new cam , Aluminum heads, intake, and headers, maybe roller rockers & windage tray.
thanks in advance for Any advice or suggestions.
 

69PaleHorse

Member
Feb 3, 2004
264
0
16
Ventura County, CA
Mar 25, 2008
#2
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #2
IMHO, if you are planning on all of those upgrades at once, you may as well buy a longblock from any of the numerous vendors online. Fussing about with an older block and then buying the roller conversion kits ($$) will net you nothing but frustration and a thinner wallet in the end.

How do I know? I asked here about those roller conversions about 6 months ago, and after reading the comments and doing the research, I opted for a later model roller block to start my project.

Now, if you are asking if there are any structural/integrity differences between the roller block years, that is a different story. Though I'm not sure you will be given that kind of option if you go with something pre-built.
 

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
Mar 25, 2008
#3
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #3
69PaleHorse said:
IMHO, if you are planning on all of those upgrades at once, you may as well buy a longblock from any of the numerous vendors online. Fussing about with an older block and then buying the roller conversion kits ($$) will net you nothing but frustration and a thinner wallet in the end.

How do I know? I asked here about those roller conversions about 6 months ago, and after reading the comments and doing the research, I opted for a later model roller block to start my project.

Now, if you are asking if there are any structural/integrity differences between the roller block years, that is a different story. Though I'm not sure you will be given that kind of option if you go with something pre-built.
Click to expand...

If I do an older style block i would not want to convert it to a roller. My question is would it be better to use a newer style block to get the roller?
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Mar 25, 2008
#4
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #4
I would get an 85+ roller block, and use the stock cam. Sounds like you don't want a real screamer but a torquey, solid 302.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 25, 2008
#5
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #5
Go for a roller 302. Either an 87-95 HO, or a 94-97 E or F150 5.0 (these have an excellant street roller cam, especially after replacing the 1.6 rockers with 1.7's) The 96-2001 Explorer 5.0 is another excellant starting point.
 
C

chromedog

New Member
Jan 13, 2006
554
0
0
worlds center for speed
Mar 25, 2008
#6
  • Mar 25, 2008
  • #6
know what really sucks? i was at the summit retail store down the street several months ago, on the clearance isle was not one, but TWO 96 explorer engines, complete, in the crate, take your pick, 2 grand... i didnt have 2000.00 in my pocket at the time, or my pony would have a roller 5.0...why they had them is still a mystery to me.
 

my70stang

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
156
0
0
Arizona
Mar 26, 2008
#7
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #7
1989 LX 5.0L is what i dropped, it still has the forged pistons and a hydrollic roller cam, i shined it up a bit to it looked as good as it performed
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 26, 2008
#8
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #8
$2000 is a bit steep for an Explorer 5.0, that might be why they still had em. The only really different parts on em were the heads, and those don't justify the price tag. The short block is the same parts used in the 94-97 E & F series trucks.
 
S

scubadds

New Member
Jan 30, 2006
3
0
0
Mar 26, 2008
#9
  • Mar 26, 2008
  • #9
I found a 90 302 roller block at my machine shop.
$300, plus cost of taking it .30 over.
Just starting to pick components.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
667
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
515
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
239
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?