• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Who is still running their 260?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 64transplant
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2009
6

64transplant

New Member
Dec 3, 2009
8
0
0
Dec 7, 2009
#1
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #1
I was wondering how many of you guys who still have your 260, have givin it a few performance upgrades. How have they worked out for you and what exactley did you do. I'm am planning on a stock rebuild and a small cam, alum intake, and an edelbrock 500 cfm carb.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2009
#2
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #2
That would run very well.
 
6

64transplant

New Member
Dec 3, 2009
8
0
0
Dec 7, 2009
#3
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #3
Cool...I'm actually putting it in my 1964 F100 (3sp convt/floor shift). The truck guys on that forum are giving me hell about it because its not "tough" enough. I just think it would be a cool and period correct little V8 to upgrade from my 223 straight 6. The truck is just gonna be a weekend cruiser for the most part.
I know valve clearence is a problem with these engines. Does anyone know how large of a cam you can safely run on a mainly stock engine?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2009
#4
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #4
64transplant said:
Cool...I'm actually putting it in my 1964 F100 (3sp convt/floor shift). The truck guys on that forum are giving me hell about it because its not "tough" enough. I just think it would be a cool and period correct little V8 to upgrade from my 223 straight 6. The truck is just gonna be a weekend cruiser for the most part.
I know valve clearence is a problem with these engines. Does anyone know how large of a cam you can safely run on a mainly stock engine?
Click to expand...

"Safely" is a pretty subjective term.
 
6

64transplant

New Member
Dec 3, 2009
8
0
0
Dec 7, 2009
#5
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #5
I'm looking for lift numbers not rhetorical answers. But thanks
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Dec 7, 2009
#6
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #6
Cam questions.

For your planned build, maybe something like this:

COMP Cams K31-218-2 - COMP Cams High Energy Cam and Lifter Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com

You should ALWAYS verify valve train geometry. Installed spring height, valve stem wear pattern, push rod length, all of it.

I think though for a cruiser as you have described, anything under .500 lift should work out.

The nice thing about the comp kits is they come complete, rather than having to piece it all together....
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2009
#7
  • Dec 7, 2009
  • #7
64transplant said:
I'm looking for lift numbers not rhetorical answers. But thanks
Click to expand...

OK, then we'll change your question to read:

64transplant said:
I know valve clearence is a problem with these engines. Does anyone know how large of a cam you can use without modifying the valve train?
Click to expand...

The C9OZ-6250-C hydraulic cam would be a good choice, performance-wise, but anything higher than Summits SUM-1799 with .456" lift should probably get screw-in valve studs.
 
6

64transplant

New Member
Dec 3, 2009
8
0
0
Dec 8, 2009
#8
  • Dec 8, 2009
  • #8
Thanks
 
R

rmorrell

New Member
Sep 12, 2009
7
0
1
Bristol TN
Dec 9, 2009
#9
  • Dec 9, 2009
  • #9
My Father still runs the original 260ci in his 64.5 coupe. It is a factory auto, AC, power steering car. It has around 150k and has had valve guide seals twice and rings and rod bearings once.

Richard
 

Mustang Jim

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2001
373
3
18
New Jersey
Dec 10, 2009
#10
  • Dec 10, 2009
  • #10
My 64.5 coupe still has it's original 260 in it. I rebuilt the engine years back and, with the exception of 030 overbore, it's all to stock specs. I'm planning on some upgrades over the next few months (4 barrel carb, dual exhaust, etc...). From what I understand, most any 289/302 enhancement will work on a 260 as the block has the same dimensions. Granted, the cylinder bores are different, but anything that's a "bolt-on" should work. I, too, have some homework to do on this subject before I start buying any parts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
896
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
809
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
737
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
915
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?