• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

why cant you put 351w heads in a 5.0 302???

  • Thread starter Thread starter slo95.0
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2003

slo95.0

New Member
Oct 24, 2003
108
0
0
fort worth texas
Oct 24, 2003
#1
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #1
95gt is the car in the swap, the 351w heads are out of a lightning

351w gt40 heads in example
62cc for the e7's vs 64cc for the 351's



the 351's have longer pushrods and the heads themselves are taller as well.

this being said, how is it possible for 351W heads to fit in a 302 5.0 while using the stock valve covers, using the stock lower intake(cobra intake for a 302) and everything fitting without any problems and only having to use different head bolts.

everyone at my job(auto technicians) say it wont work and showed me all these books saying they need different pushrods and wont bolt up correctlly , yet many on here say no problems, has anyone done this swap themselves??




btw thanks for the help and say hi to the newb, dont worry other then bad grammer i have pretty good nettique and im glad to be a part of such a good forum for us 94-95 guys
 

mach1sys

Member
Nov 30, 2000
71
0
6
Oct 24, 2003
#2
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #2
i dont know about the intake/valve covers but I do know that they will bolt up just fine as long as you have washers. 351W's use 1/2 inch head bolts and 302's use 7/16 inch head bolts. a set of new pushrods is pretty cheap.
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Oct 24, 2003
#3
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #3
Back in the 70's & 80's Ford used the same heads for 302 & 351 engines.
 

slo95.0

New Member
Oct 24, 2003
108
0
0
fort worth texas
Oct 24, 2003
#4
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #4
a friend has just totally cleared this all up for me, FYI you have to use stock pushrods whether you like it or not. the block determines the pushrod length not the head,
302=302 pushrods even with 351 heads
351=351 pushrods even with 302 heads

thanks for helping the newb!
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Oct 24, 2003
#5
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #5
the head bolt sizes are different but you can get the ARP stuff to adapt
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Oct 24, 2003
#6
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #6
slo95.0 said:
FYI you have to use stock pushrods whether you like it or not. the block determines the pushrod length not the head
Click to expand...
That's not true. Yes, the block has an impact on pushrod, since it has a taller deck. But the valvetrain geometry, rocker selection, and even the cam (if it has a non-stock base circle radius) all affect required pushrod length. If you're going with 100% stock 351 heads and valvetrain (a mistake in my opinion), then sure, stock 351 pushrods will work. Otherwise, I would use a pushrod length checker and get exactly the right length pushrods, that's the best way to do it.

Dave
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Apr 17, 2004
#7
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #7
Sorry b/c I bring this old topic
One guy have stock GT-40 heads from 94 351 Lightning for sale cheap
Can those heads fit on ours Stangs or not , if yes what else I need to swap them
 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
2,723
0
0
Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)
Apr 17, 2004
#8
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #8
They are gt40 heads and they are nothing special. They are not the trouble since you have to ger arp adapters. Don't waste you time or money.
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Apr 17, 2004
#9
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #9
Seth, if you want a good set of heads for a decent price why not look into the GT40-P heads? These flow better than a set of ported E7s.
 
3

331 cobra

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
398
0
0
Silicon Valley CA
Apr 17, 2004
#10
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #10
Lots of people spend a good ammount of money for ported E7's. If you can get the heads and all of the required parts for less than a set of ported E7's, it's a pretty good deal.

Also, with those GT40's, you don't need to change your exhaust to change your spark plugs like the GT40p's.

Just make sure that they don't need a lot of work. Milling heads and a valve job are pretty cheap, but it does add up.
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Apr 17, 2004
#11
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #11
What would you need to put a set of heads that were previously on a 351 on to a 302? What is the part number?

I just yanked off the ported trick flow heads off my 418 and want to sell them but want the right information in case somebody ask... Im sure 302 guys would want these a lot more then 351 guys..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
931
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
Engine Head gasket or what?
  • Foxbody1988
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2020
7991LXnSHO
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?