• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Why does everyone bash the Cobra intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88-378
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Jan 31, 2009
#1
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #1
Sure, it may not be right for a 500hp track car, but it can, in the right combo produce 400hp. It has been done many times in feature cars and i am sure on this board..

Plus, IMO it is THE best looking intake ever!

If you want more out of your Cobra intake, send it to Tmoss! I just got mine back and i will say he does very good work!

And when it actually goes on my car, i am sure i can work it a little more to get it to perform the way i need it.
 

Vinnietbird

Member
Jun 2, 2005
584
3
19
Jan 31, 2009
#2
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #2
I have a visually modified Explorer intake and think it's been great for my car.There's always a better intake somewhere,but,there's nothing wrong with the Cobra intake at all.Many Stang know it alls from the Mustang publications say it's one of the best for a mildly built street engine.
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Jan 31, 2009
#3
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #3
I don't know, i just love the look! There is really only one intake that is better looking, the Gt40 tube.

I hope to put down 325 to the wheels with a refreshed bottom 306, AFR's, 10:1 and all supporting mods with my Cobra. and to get over 400, i will just add 5-6lbs of boost.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Jan 31, 2009
#4
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #4
IMO the GT40 tube upper is the best looking intake on a Mustang that I have ever seen.

I like the Cobra intake and it certainly performs well. So I have no reason to bash it. I think that a lot of the bashing has to do with the new ones that are make in China by children.
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Jan 31, 2009
#5
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #5
I like the cobra intake and Tom Moss is great at porting.
 

asecretfile

New Member
Feb 11, 2007
228
0
0
Jan 31, 2009
#6
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #6
RYC CUKR said:
IMO the GT40 tube upper is the best looking intake on a Mustang that I have ever seen.

I like the Cobra intake and it certainly performs well. So I have no reason to bash it. I think that a lot of the bashing has to do with the new ones that are make in China by children.
Click to expand...

Ill have to agree there, the tubular gt40 intake looks nasty. One of my favs is the Holley Systemax
 

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
Jan 31, 2009
#7
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #7
I've never heard anyone bash the Cobra intake, cept if they wanted loads of power. That ain't what its for, though, and that should be pretty well understood. My stock intake is a TMoss piece, and I expect a Cobra intake done up by them aughta be fantastic!
 

mustanggt5pt0

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
34
0
0
Cedar Falls, Iowa
Jan 31, 2009
#8
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #8
I have a replica cobra intake. I will bash it for two reasons. The first is the baffle that it came with wasn't large enough so the PCV was sucking oil, about 1 quart 300 miles. Luckily I was rebuilding my motor again when I found out the fix of having ford racing send a new larger one. That problem is probably what made my first rebuild go to crap. The second reason I don't like it is that a part on the dizzy will hit on the lower intake manifold near the large radiator hose hook-up. It makes stabbing the dizzy hard and tuning hard too. And the casting looks like crap. Besides that it works fine haha.

As for a genuine cobra intake I have had zero experience.
 

JGT

Member
Oct 29, 2006
0
0
7
Charleston, SC
Jan 31, 2009
#9
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #9
+1 on the china thing

It also might be because the Cobra/GT40 intake is viewed as the baseline intake when comparing to aftermarket options. People usually want to think what they have is better because they paid more for it. They are insecure about their intakes and want to feel better about spending the $600+
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Jan 31, 2009
#10
  • Jan 31, 2009
  • #10
I've never heard anyone "bash" the cobra intake on here other than the poor quality of the china made ones. I have an original one on my car and it works great! No clearance issues with the dizzy, although I do have a small oil consumption issue. If you look at any intake comparison chart, you'll see it flows just as well if not better than pretty much all other intakes up to about 4-4.5k. Can't argue with real figures
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Feb 1, 2009
#11
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #11
mustanggt5pt0 said:
I have a replica cobra intake. I will bash it for two reasons. The first is the baffle that it came with wasn't large enough so the PCV was sucking oil, about 1 quart 300 miles. Luckily I was rebuilding my motor again when I found out the fix of having ford racing send a new larger one. That problem is probably what made my first rebuild go to crap. The second reason I don't like it is that a part on the dizzy will hit on the lower intake manifold near the large radiator hose hook-up. It makes stabbing the dizzy hard and tuning hard too. And the casting looks like crap. Besides that it works fine haha.

As for a genuine cobra intake I have had zero experience.
Click to expand...

My exact experience. I wouldn't recommend it. I offed mine when I got my GT40.
 

aar0s

Founding Member
Dec 20, 1998
1,015
55
69
Feb 1, 2009
#12
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #12
after hearing you guys talk about the ones made in china im glad that i bought mine back in the day!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
Feb 1, 2009
#13
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #13
Me too

<Hugs my USA-made Cobra Intake>
 

88-378

Member
Aug 10, 2007
14
2
16
Alpharetta, GA
Feb 1, 2009
#14
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #14
I hear ya on the china one. i have an original as well. Off of a 93 Cobra.

I just think everyone under rates it.
 
1

1SickFox

New Member
Jun 10, 2008
16
0
0
Feb 1, 2009
#15
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #15
I think the Cobra intake is an awesome street car intake as well. I have an original one of a '93 cobra that i just powdercoated and put a new sticker on so it looks better then new now lol. But i'll be putting out 400rwhp through it this spring when the car gets tuned. I also think it is the best looking intake besides the Systemax II.
 
K

Kevins89notch5.0

Founding Member
Founding Member
Jan 1, 2000
5,864
1
78
Feb 1, 2009
#16
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #16
RYC CUKR said:
IMO the GT40 tube upper is the best looking intake on a Mustang that I have ever seen.
Click to expand...

Yup!

If I ever have to do a head gasket swap on my 89, I'll be yanking the POS intake I have that requires a deep fisting to get one of the intake bolts on, and installing a true GT40 intake.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
Feb 1, 2009
#17
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #17
If i can find a GT-40 upper that someone doesn't want $900 for, i'll remove my Cobra upper and swap it
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 1, 2009
#18
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #18
I do like the Cobra/GT-40/Explorer intakes, they flow great and make awesome mid-range torque for a mild 302. They all are good looking, but for some reason the Explorer is my favorite in terms of looks. I had the chance to get a Cobra upper, but I went for the Explorer... I dunno, I just think its sexy. The GT-40s are way overpriced.

But for my money, the SEXIEST intakes on the market are the Trick Flow R-Series:



 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Feb 1, 2009
#19
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #19
My GT40 intake..


 

Attachments

  • 4jqt20.webp
    14.8 KB · Views: 187
  • ruz3bt.webp
    13.5 KB · Views: 196

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 1, 2009
#20
  • Feb 1, 2009
  • #20
I think the issue here is, if you don't have to, then why run it? Why pay to buy it and then pay to have it ported if you can buy something else that works better without porting, which you can then have ported to work even better?

This works with a lot of parts....like why bash GT40P heads when they can make decent power? Well if you can get something better, why run stock parts?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
841
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
B
90Gt squeal/chirp when hot
  • Bvoss59
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
575
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2025
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?