• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Why the Fox Conversions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brentwoodboy
  • Start date Start date Sep 26, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Dave95GT

bAd mUtha
Founding Member
Jan 10, 2001
477
0
0
Looking for all of my missing posts
Sep 26, 2004
#21
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #21
94DreamGT said:
Dave...how far apart were those dyno runs? I'm assuming they weren't on the same day, right?

Was it the same dyno? What were you using before the c&L?
Click to expand...
Correct, they dyno pulls were on different days. I cant remember exactly how far apart they were, but Id guess a month or so. It was on the same dyno, I get a deal at this place

Before the C&L, I had a BBK CAI
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 26, 2004
#22
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #22
Chris, what I don't understand is how you are seeing a 2lb increase in boost. Boost is nothing more than a measure of backpressure in the intake tract. If the fox TB flows better than ours, boost should go down on a centrifical SC'd car. It'd be different on say a KB where a reduction in bottlenecks in front of the blower yeild boost increases, just like a powerpipe on a centrifical. I was just wondering if there is something I am missing here
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Sep 26, 2004
#23
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #23
brentwoodboy said:
Been seeing people drop $500 on Fox Intake Conversions. What Pros does it have over, say, a stock 95 intake with throttle body and fenderwell CAI?
Click to expand...
Good for Vortech cars b/c you can run a power cooler set-up that isn't availiable for 94/95's.
 

onebad95

Sherriff of Bling King County
Jul 22, 2002
1,237
0
37
At the end of the track waiting for you !!
Sep 27, 2004
#24
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #24
94SC50 said:
Good for Vortech cars b/c you can run a power cooler set-up that isn't availiable for 94/95's.
Click to expand...


I doubt it will fit because of the strut tower clearance. Atleast, that is what I was told.
 
R

raginbul469

Founding Member
Oct 23, 2001
160
0
0
michigan
Sep 27, 2004
#25
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #25
well i jsut made my conversion only swap parts i bought was a fox TPS and IAC valve. both parts cost me a total of 69.98.

my car is a toatly different car now. night and day difference as far as power and driveabilty!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 27, 2004
#26
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #26
I recall a year or two after the SN-95 came out. One of the magazines dyno'd both the Fox and SN-95 back to back and the Fox consistently made something like 7-10rwhp more than the SN-95 in almost every pull. Considering everything else but the intake and computer are essentially the same, I'd say you've got your answer.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Sep 27, 2004
#27
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #27
Killer,
I'm seeing the boost gains down-low up top I'm yet to see...but going from 2 1/4 to 3" is going to increase flow, and let that supercharger breathe much better. I hear what you are saying about the more flow=less boost, but this kit helped me p/u 2psi right off the bat in the lower rpms.
 

onebad95

Sherriff of Bling King County
Jul 22, 2002
1,237
0
37
At the end of the track waiting for you !!
Sep 28, 2004
#28
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #28
Paul,

I was thinking the same thing, but then I was also wondering why is it when you install a powerpipe you pick up boost. That has to be freeing up more air than the stock s/c set up ?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 28, 2004
#29
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #29
onebad95 said:
Paul,

I was thinking the same thing, but then I was also wondering why is it when you install a powerpipe you pick up boost. That has to be freeing up more air than the stock s/c set up ?
Click to expand...


You pick up boost with a powerpipe because with it you decrease the restriction IN FRONT of the blower. Anytime you do this you make it more efficient and it is able to pull more air in per revolution of the blower, so more air is pushed out of it and therefore boost goes up. It goes back to the statement I made above about the KB blower. On a KB, the MAF, TB, inlet tube, etc are all in front of the blower itself. So on a KB, you will see an increase in boost with a powerpipe (a NA one), AND you will see an increase in boost with a bigger MAF and TB. The less of a restriction you have BEFORE, NOT AFTER the blower the more air it can push per revolution. In theory if you add a bigger MAF and TB to a centrifical SC, which are AFTER the blower, you will see a boost DECREASE because as I said, boost is nothing more than a measurement of backpressure in the area AFTER the SC compresses it. So... going back to what I said above, if the fox inlet flows more and is less of a restriction, you should see a DECREASE in boost, not the other way around.


Just remember, boost doesn't equal airflow, its a measurement of the backpressure in the intake track.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Sep 28, 2004
#30
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #30
Def. makes sense, and I'm with you...when I ported my heads I lost boost...same principle.
Mainly the gains I'm seeing is where before at like 3k I'd only have 3-4psi, now I'm seeing 6psi really quick...It was a very obvious change.
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#31
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #31
I'm gonna be switching to a fox body set up myself this winter. Picked up a system II intake for $300. Gonna hit up the local speed shop for as many stock parts as I can and then go from there. I'm basically doing it becuase i wanna run a blow-through mass air and the fox setup will allow me more room.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,632
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#32
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #32
What do you think. Would it be correct to say on a N/A setup that if there is proper vacuum pressure at WOT, then the intake is not causing a restriction.

Kurt
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
593
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
873
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
473
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 2:00 PM
spencergt66
S
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?