• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Will my computer like my cam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickm347
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2004
N

nickm347

Member
Jul 13, 2003
160
0
16
Nov 18, 2004
#1
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #1
Im doin a 347 stoker motor with a big comp cam(sorry i forgot the exact specs, and i know its imprtant). my question is how well will the computer hold up with this untill i can get a tweecer or computer tuner of some type. i have a JET performance chip in it right now, will that do fine for now, or should i be expecting some trouble when i get my motor in?
 
1

1hot5.0

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,615
0
0
Surprise, Arizona
Nov 18, 2004
#2
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #2
I don't know for sure, but from what I have read, our stock computers do not do well with aftermarket cams at all. I know the idle would surge alot and all but I would think the car would at least be driveable?
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Nov 18, 2004
#3
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #3
define 'Big'...

Crower, CompCams, Crane & Lunati all recommended keeping duration @ .050" less than 230 when using an unmodified/unchipped stock computer. Biggest I've seen without any significant issues is the CompCams XE274HR with 224 int/232 exh @ .050".

You'll probably get a lot more accurate feedback if you put up the cam specs
 

fawcett

Member
Sep 10, 2003
380
0
16
Cohasset, Ma
Nov 18, 2004
#4
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #4
i have an e cam in my 95 and the computer hates it. i was told to get a steeda #19 but i didnt, they are made for our cars. i really wish i went with something my car would like, but i didnt. now i have to get a pms or tweecer- something you might want to consider also. from what i have heard, chips dont do it, we need something more. i have never used or seen either tweecer nor pms (except in the magazines and on the internet) but as soon as i grow a sack, im gettin one of those so my car doesnt die everytime i come from wot to a stop, or sometimes just come to a stop.
good luck buddy
fawcett
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 18, 2004
#5
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #5
SlowGT said:
define 'Big'...

Crower, CompCams, Crane & Lunati all recommended keeping duration @ .050" less than 230 when using an unmodified/unchipped stock computer. Biggest I've seen without any significant issues is the CompCams XE274HR with 224 int/232 exh @ .050".

You'll probably get a lot more accurate feedback if you put up the cam specs
Click to expand...
My cam is smaller than that on both sides and my car would die EVERY SINGLE TIME when I came to a stop. Our computers seem to not like tight LSA's either. Comp's cams are usually a 114 (+4) design, so you probably won't have a problem there. It will just be an issue of excessive duration.

Joe
 

canadian94gt

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
139
0
0
Debert, Nova Scotia,Canada
Nov 18, 2004
#6
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #6
I've got the xe274hr and it idles fine. I had to set the idle at about 900 before I got the tweecer. Now I can idle at 700rpm and it sounds really aggressive.
 
N

nickm347

Member
Jul 13, 2003
160
0
16
Nov 18, 2004
#7
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #7
i dont remeber the specs on my cam, so i figured i would say it is"big" just to be safe
it looks like my JET performance chip isnt going to cut it
does anyone have a rough idea on how expensive a tuner for the computer will be?
 

canadian94gt

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
139
0
0
Debert, Nova Scotia,Canada
Nov 18, 2004
#8
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #8
I think tweecer is backordered. They go for around $600. You can pick up a used one off ebay or corral classifieds for between $400-$500. Make sure to get the RT model if you want to do datalogging plus it hooks up with just a USB cable. They really are worth the money. Since you can modify things as you add to your setup. It also gives you five different tunes that are at the twist of a knob. You can have a race tune, a city driving tune, a highway tune, etc.
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 18, 2004
#9
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #9
If you're worried about cam/computer compatibility and you're going to get a tune or EEC tuner later then don't let the computer affect which cam you choose. Choose the RIGHT cam for your combo and let the tune take care of the computer. I went with a Crower 15511 hoping I wouldn't need a tune but if you're going to spend all of that money on performance it only makes sense to have a custome tune to make it work up to it's potential. I got a SCT custom dyno tune w/17 pulls for $375. Yes, it's a one-time tune but I don't plan on making any major changes to my combo for a long time. My car has a noticable lopey idle but the driveability and performance are great after the tune.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 18, 2004
#10
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #10
HoofnIt said:
If you're worried about cam/computer compatibility and you're going to get a tune or EEC tuner later then don't let the computer affect which cam you choose. Choose the RIGHT cam for your combo and let the tune take care of the computer.
Click to expand...

BINGO

This Man Wins the Prize

Only difference is I like to do my own tuning.

Later
Grady
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Nov 18, 2004
#11
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #11
I must be the only one who lives in a state where emmissions, is an issue. I would love to switch out my cam for a more aggressive profile but I've got one problem. EMMISSIONS The emmissions here in Mo are a strickt. Aggressive cams are a sure way to flunk your test. Im sure sombody must make a cam with this in mind but where do you look? And if such a cam exist does the horsepower you gain justify the cam swap?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 18, 2004
#12
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #12
greenlantern said:
I must be the only one who lives in a state where emmissions, is an issue. I would love to switch out my cam for a more aggressive profile but I've got one problem. EMMISSIONS The emmissions here in Mo are a strickt.
Click to expand...

I live in the DFW area of Texas and we have to pass the dyno roller kind of emissions test yearly. We also have those state owned step side vans that put out those sniffer probes that park at highway on ramps and test cars that pass by for dirty emissions.

My cam is not mild by any means and I have no problem passing the emission inspection and have passed it for the past two years.

Aggressive cams are a sure way to flunk your test.
Click to expand...

I am one example that has to challange that statement.

Im sure sombody must make a cam with this in mind but where do you look?
Click to expand...

Ed Curtis, Jay Allen, Buddy Rawls

And if such a cam exist does the horsepower you gain justify the cam swap?
Click to expand...

I don't think my rwhp & rwtq would be near what they are now with the stock cam so my answer to that statement would be .... YES the cam swap was worth the gain in horsepower.

Later
Grady
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 19, 2004
#13
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #13
The cam can be aggressive as hell. My cam has ZERO overlap at 0.050", so it should pass. For big companies to get a CARB number for an OTS cam, they need to have zero overlap @ 0.006". Any of the aforementioned names could make you cam that runs cleaner than the stocker with tons more power.

Joe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
E
Nightmare after tune install!
  • EnemyofTyranny
  • Mar 29, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
414
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2025
89ripper
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
758
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?