• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Will Shorty Headers Make Enough Power with Cams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrueBlue03
  • Start date Start date Apr 29, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

TrueBlue03

Member
Dec 9, 2003
372
3
18
Bay Area, CA
Apr 29, 2006
#1
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #1
This summer im planning on VT Stage 1 cams and i want to get some headers on the car to go along with it. I heard longtubes are great BUT illegal and wont work also because im lowered nearly 2.5" in front

...so I talked to a buddy who just installed some bassani midlengths and he said not to go with shortys because they will hardly make any power?? ... but im worried if i get midlengths, they wont even pass smog if i put back on my stock H...

AND i dont want to have to buy another midpipe for midlength headers, so i was thinking i would go with shorty headers for convienence, BUT does anyone know much hp difference is there between midlengths and shortys?? i would not think shortys would be completely useless cuz they would still be freeing up exhaust flow over stock...would they be worth the money??

PS: keep in mind im gonna have a plenum, throttle body, and CAI before the cams and headers.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Apr 29, 2006
#2
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #2
you cant use a midlength header with a stock h, they are illegal here. you have no choice but to use shorties. you have to have all 4 cats unmodified in CA. also the cost involved in swapping out the headers every 2 years for smog would be cost limiting.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Apr 29, 2006
#3
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #3
bdcardinal said:
you cant use a midlength header with a stock h, they are illegal here. you have no choice but to use shorties. you have to have all 4 cats unmodified in CA. also the cost involved in swapping out the headers every 2 years for smog would be cost limiting.
Click to expand...

i agree with bdcardinal on this 100% we are screwed as far as swapping into L/T headers but shorties are good not much of a power gain but who knows if you would gain a bit with cams
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 29, 2006
#4
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #4
well seeing as how I do have shorties. Like I've said I picked up 20 rwhp with shorties and UD pullies. We all know UD pullies do not pick up that much. I also had 10ftlbs of torque or more across the board compared to the stock manifolds. Now are LT's better gains, and install basically the same YES. But if been able to use the stock h pipe and been able to access and remove items like starter, and tranny are an issue then shorties are worth it.
as a side note the stock manifolds are HEAVY compared to any header, just think of them as a weight saving's.
BTW as far as power is an issue, my car put down 468rwhp and 543 ftlbs all on stock heads and cams, so I don't think they are really holding it back powerwise.Just now kinda wondering would it would have done with LT's.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Apr 29, 2006
#5
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #5
BooWFO said:
well seeing as how I do have shorties. Like I've said I picked up 20 rwhp with shorties and UD pullies. We all know UD pullies do not pick up that much. I also had 10ftlbs of torque or more across the board compared to the stock manifolds. Now are LT's better gains, and install basically the same YES. But if been able to use the stock h pipe and been able to access and remove items like starter, and tranny are an issue then shorties are worth it.
as a side note the stock manifolds are HEAVY compared to any header, just think of them as a weight saving's.
BTW as far as power is an issue, my car put down 468rwhp and 543 ftlbs all on stock heads and cams, so I don't think they are really holding it back powerwise.Just now kinda wondering would it would have done with LT's.
Click to expand...

hmmm interesting......... what brand are you using for the headers???
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 29, 2006
#6
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #6
BooWFO said:
well seeing as how I do have shorties. Like I've said I picked up 20 rwhp with shorties and UD pullies.
Click to expand...
Correction.....your car picked up 20rwhp/10lbs ft with the shorties and pulleys....only after you had every other mod in your sig bolted on. There's no way in hell that hearders (of any kind) and pulleys alone would give you that kind of power gain on a stock GT.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Apr 29, 2006
#7
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #7
shorties don't make alot of useable power. they make upper end power but can cost you in the lower part of the band.

for example the JBA shorties do okay on the dyno but there was someone over at the modular depot can't remeber exactly who that just did not pick up any ET with them. It may have been startkie. I am sure the posts are still there if you want to search. I almost went with them but decied to spend money in other places.

so if you are a dyno person they help but on the track itself they are a bit marginal IMO. the ford ones are worthless N/A IMO. mods like this are why you see decent hp numbers with so so ET's some times. they make good peak hp but not alot of average hp.

I mean basically shorties are as expensive as having gears done and they will not give you the same et advantage.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Apr 29, 2006
#8
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #8
they are better than nothing. too bad about emissions. can you CA guys pay a buddy to fudge emissions?
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Apr 30, 2006
#9
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #9
wow another bay area guy! whassup!

well there is a guy on cafords.com in the for sale section selling jba shorties for 400. just to let you kno
 

90RanGer

New Member
Apr 1, 2004
132
0
0
Santa Cruz, CA
Apr 30, 2006
#10
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #10
I was going down this road before, from all the research ive done they are not worth it. The don't gain much N/A and the gains you do get are up top, and you lose power down low. I believe the only carb legal headers are the jba shorties, the only ones I think I would get are the tuned length bbk shorties, but they arent carb legal..
 
G

GT02MG

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
49
0
0
MD
Apr 30, 2006
#11
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #11
Gearbanger 101 said:
Correction.....your car picked up 20rwhp/10lbs ft with the shorties and pulleys....only after you had every other mod in your sig bolted on. There's no way in hell that hearders (of any kind) and pulleys alone would give you that kind of power gain on a stock GT.
Click to expand...



Exactly....time and time again on a stock GTs shorties dont make much power at all and the cost of them plus installation isnt even close to being a worthwhile mod.
 

TrueBlue03

Member
Dec 9, 2003
372
3
18
Bay Area, CA
Apr 30, 2006
#12
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #12
well my car wont exactly be completely stock... i was just hoping shorties could open up the flow a little with the future cams, plenum, TB, CAI and tune im ordering all together...but maybe their still not worth it??

thats a bummer...i wish i could get the midlengths, but its not worth the hassle of swapping them to pass smog and all that crad. damn i hate cali for this
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Apr 30, 2006
#13
  • Apr 30, 2006
  • #13
the only way I would see shorties being worth it N/A is if you did a hole top end swap and raised you rpm range of your enine up a bit. that is so expensive you may as well just boost the car though.

the stock intake and heads are not really going to alow you build usable power all the way to 6300 rpms or anything though.
 

TrueBlue03

Member
Dec 9, 2003
372
3
18
Bay Area, CA
May 1, 2006
#14
  • May 1, 2006
  • #14
so ....everyones basically saying leave on the stock exhaust manifolds because the shorties are not worth the money...it just seems like the stockers would be a lot more restrictive than shorties but if they're really not gonna make any usable power then i guess i wont waste my money...

...hmmm im still determined to get the cams tho, so i guess i'll just try to figure out a way to get around smog somehow with midlength headers in the future.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 1, 2006
#15
  • May 1, 2006
  • #15
TrueBlue03 said:
so ....everyones basically saying leave on the stock exhaust manifolds because the shorties are not worth the money...it just seems like the stockers would be a lot more restrictive than shorties but if they're really not gonna make any usable power then i guess i wont waste my money...

...hmmm im still determined to get the cams tho, so i guess i'll just try to figure out a way to get around smog somehow with midlength headers in the future.
Click to expand...
A few of the guys over on TCCOA have been porting their stock manifolds with good results. I mean, I'm sure the power gain is minimal, but it certainly couldn't hurt.....and probably isn't that far off from the less than impressive power levels that a set of shorty headers provides?
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 1, 2006
#16
  • May 1, 2006
  • #16
TrueBlue03 said:
so ....everyones basically saying leave on the stock exhaust manifolds because the shorties are not worth the money...it just seems like the stockers would be a lot more restrictive than shorties but if they're really not gonna make any usable power then i guess i wont waste my money...

...hmmm im still determined to get the cams tho, so i guess i'll just try to figure out a way to get around smog somehow with midlength headers in the future.
Click to expand...


imho i would get them even though people tell me there not worth it cause its cali so at least it would be better than the stockers and if you plan on doing some heavier mods like cams i think that they will benefit from that
 

speedfreak98r

Banned
Jan 31, 2006
0
0
0
Houston Area
May 1, 2006
#17
  • May 1, 2006
  • #17
Anyone know if Long tubes are illeagal in the Houston area? I mean with a catted mid pipe?
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
May 1, 2006
#18
  • May 1, 2006
  • #18
speedfreak98r said:
Anyone know if Long tubes are illeagal in the Houston area? I mean with a catted mid pipe?
Click to expand...
I thought LT's were illegal everywhere that is smogged.


The only benefit from shorties besides the 3-4rwhp(more with more serious mods) is the weight savings. Those stock manifolds are like anchors.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 1, 2006
#19
  • May 1, 2006
  • #19
DropTopPony said:
I thought LT's were illegal everywhere that is smogged.


The only benefit from shorties besides the 3-4rwhp(more with more serious mods) is the weight savings. Those stock manifolds are like anchors.
Click to expand...


yeah L/T's are illegal where ever there is smog testing

thats true and since i live in Cali i wouldnt mind getting the shorties......
 

speedfreak98r

Banned
Jan 31, 2006
0
0
0
Houston Area
May 1, 2006
#20
  • May 1, 2006
  • #20
DAMNIT! I'm fixin to do my PI head swap with the VT stage 2 cams, and some Kooks long tubes. Oh well. Damn tree-hugging, crystal-holding EPA hippies!!!!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
327
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
223
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
585
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
673
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
667
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?