• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

X_pipe Or Pro Chamber?????????

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike keirstead
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Nov 17, 2003
#1
  • Nov 17, 2003
  • #1
hey- i was wondering if anyone has proof of which makes more power .
MACS PRO CHAMBER OR THE BEST X-PIPE OUT THERE?
I am getting sick of my h-pipe sound and getting something new real soon. I love sound of the pro chamber and the x-pipe also sounds real wicked. But sound dosnt mean s hit sometimes. Any help would be great . thanks
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Nov 18, 2003
#2
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #2
From the comparison tests i've seen in the magazines the prochamber makes more power. But as far as real world stuff i can attest that the prochamber makes nice power but then again i've never been in an x piped car.
 
C

CPB00GT

Founding Member
Dec 3, 2001
531
1
18
Florida
Nov 18, 2003
#3
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #3
Most people I have talked to say the X pipe will make a little more HP than the H, but the H makes a little more torque. I guess its a low end or top end thing, it depends on what your looking for. My old X pipe got all kinds of compliments on the sound, but I really didn,t like it.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Nov 18, 2003
#4
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #4
Prochamber > X-pipe > H-pipe
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Nov 18, 2003
#5
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #5
CPB00GT said:
Most people I have talked to say the X pipe will make a little more HP than the H, but the H makes a little more torque. I guess its a low end or top end thing, it depends on what your looking for. My old X pipe got all kinds of compliments on the sound, but I really didn,t like it.
Click to expand...

not sure exactly what the prochamber is except for maybe a muffler
which if that is the case what is so special about it?

but as far as x-pipe vs h-pipe
I have seen a few test done and the h-pipe might gain you a little more peak torque, but generally no more then maybe 2-5lbs/ft for like a 500rpm range other then that the x beat it hands down
BUT the x-pipe has a broader more usable torque curve
so overall x is better then h
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Nov 18, 2003
#6
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #6
supposedly the x will make more power
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Nov 18, 2003
#7
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #7
rx7speed - you dont know what a pro chamber is. MAC makes them.
 

PonyGrl420

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
450
0
16
SC
Nov 18, 2003
#8
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #8
this explains it http://reviews.stangnet.com/review.cgi?ID=147

itll be on my next fox
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 18, 2003
#9
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #9
I read the reviews before buying, pretty much kicks every other h or x pipes butt in performance, and sounds nice too! Those reviews are all over the place , from budget stip cars to flow and tech sites. Mac is a pretty cool company when it comes to exhuast. I live 25 mins from their manufacturing facilities in Southern california

keep it real
-wood
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Nov 18, 2003
#10
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #10
ya i read that but it dosnt give any numbers. I know a prochamber IS.
 

PonyGrl420

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
450
0
16
SC
Nov 18, 2003
#11
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #11
mike keirstead said:
ya i read that but it dosnt give any numbers. I know a prochamber IS.
Click to expand...

Yea I actualy posted the for rxspeed. Im pretty sure MAC had dyno graphs in thier catalog, unfortanitly its in NY and im in PA.
 

Jo_885o

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
422
0
0
Clint. Twp, Michigan
Nov 18, 2003
#12
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #12
Prochamber!!!!!!!!!!!
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
Nov 18, 2003
#13
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #13
prochambers a unique sound and lound as hell when you get on it
 

what_stanger?

I am the mailman!!
Founding Member
Feb 7, 2002
1,697
0
36
Northern Illinois
Nov 18, 2003
#14
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #14
bassani X, stainless, enough said.

i don't see how the air slapping around inside the prochamber would flow as efficiently as the X pipe?

but maybe it looks different inside?
i don't know

i opted for the stainless X pipe without cats from bassani, works fine for me
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Nov 18, 2003
#15
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #15
I think i will get the prochamber. They do sound pretty wicked. Thanks Fellas.
 

dvsmike

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
70
0
0
Chicago il
Nov 18, 2003
#16
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #16
I have a Bassani catted x -pipe w/ 2 chamber flows. Sounds pissed at wot.
 

bit

Founding Member
Sep 27, 1999
1,975
1
48
Anderson, SC
Nov 18, 2003
#17
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #17
The Prochamber is without a doubt the best. I have had a BBK h-pipe and the Prochamber. The Prochamber OWNS ALL. You will not regret buying it.
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Nov 18, 2003
#18
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #18
I have also heard that the Pro Chambeer out performs both X and H pipes. I cant say from personal experience but it is supposed to sound real good. I would say go for the prochamber.
 

bit

Founding Member
Sep 27, 1999
1,975
1
48
Anderson, SC
Nov 18, 2003
#19
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #19
Since everyone is talking about how they sound, here is a clip of my car. The exhaust is BBK 1 5/8" shorties, 2 1/2" Prochamber, and 2 1/2" Magnaflow cat-bak. The motor at the time was stock heads and cam.
http://www.coe.uncc.edu/~bktedder/pictures/Brent Run 2.MPG
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Nov 18, 2003
#20
  • Nov 18, 2003
  • #20
it seems most ppl here and even on the prochamber site are comparing it to an hpipe

which it might be better
but I think an x would work better then a prochamber
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
735
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
A
1990 Ford Mustang GT catalytic convertor
  • ar_legend
  • Jul 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
840
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2024
AeroCoupe
Resolved Tapping sound on passenger side of engine
  • sav22rem22
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 22, 2024
sav22rem22
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
542
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?