• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption

  • Thread starter Thread starter PonyGTrider
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2026
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 11
Next
First Prev 5 of 11 Next Last

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 16, 2026
#81
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #81
Bullitt347 said:
Tailpipes black on the inside?
Click to expand...
Driver side is super clean, driver side has a very faint dark color but not like it is over fueling or running too rich
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,862
3,992
183
Claremore, OK
Apr 16, 2026
#82
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #82
I’m still saying it’s running a bit rich. Not pig rich or anything but those plugs are not showing me the burn is clean.
 
Reactions: General karthief, PonyGTrider and DadLife0724

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 16, 2026
#83
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #83
———————-U P D A T E———————
Well I received the leak down tester I ordered and started taking measurements immediately.
After that I run a new compression test to have freshly taken results.
Both tests were taken with the engine bone cold and here are the numbers and to tell you the truth they don’t make any sense to me, they’re all over!!! But here they are:
Compression test cold, 5 strokes TB wide open:
1 - 170
2 - 135
3 - 145
4 - 130
5 - 130
6 - 145
7 - 140
8 - 135
Leak down test cold, each piston at TDC on compression stroke all of the leakage went thru the pistons rings and didn’t notice any leakage thru the valves.
1- 20%
2- 15%
3- 15%
4- 20%
5- 22%
6- 15%
7- 15%
8- 17%

This engine is a mess as far as my concern.
And what to do from here? Tear it apart deglaze with honing stones, replace rod and main bearings and put new rings? Again there is no blow by whatsoever and feels running strong.

Do this numbers tell you guys anything is causing an extremely poor fuel economy????

Thank you guys!!!!
 
Last edited: Apr 16, 2026

DadLife0724

Active Member
Mar 22, 2024
263
192
53
Cooperstown, PA
Apr 16, 2026
#84
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #84
I would think any smell of gas in the oil is no bueno.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 16, 2026
#85
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #85
AeroCoupe said:
I’m still saying it’s running a bit rich. Not pig rich or anything but those plugs are not showing me the burn is clean.
Click to expand...
I want to put a new set of plugs but before I do that I’ll wait for some comments and suggestion regarding my compression and leak down tests.
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 16, 2026
#86
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #86
DadLife0724 said:
I would think any smell of gas in the oil is no bueno.
Click to expand...
Probably it is just the smell of the combustion not necessarily raw fuel
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,862
3,992
183
Claremore, OK
Apr 16, 2026
#87
  • Apr 16, 2026
  • #87
So compression and leak down tests need to be done with the engine at operating temperature.
 
Reactions: General karthief and PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#88
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #88
AeroCoupe said:
So compression and leak down tests need to be done with the engine at operating temperature.
Click to expand...
I will do both tests tomorrow at operating temp
 
Reactions: AeroCoupe

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,862
3,992
183
Claremore, OK
Apr 17, 2026
#89
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #89
Reason behind it is metal expands when hot so you want everything up to temperature to close up the tolerances. Think ring gap and as the motor heats up those gaps get smaller (how small depends on the setup) and cylinder bore gets smaller. This will all increase or at least should increase the compression numbers and decrease the leak down percentage.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider, DadLife0724 and nicholase

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#90
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #90
AeroCoupe said:
Reason behind it is metal expands when hot so you want everything up to temperature to close up the tolerances. Think ring gap and as the motor heats up those gaps get smaller (how small depends on the setup) and cylinder bore gets smaller. This will all increase or at least should increase the compression numbers and decrease the leak down percentage.
Click to expand...
That makes sense, but have you or any of you find out this whole thing goes the opposite?
I’m saying this because comparing the cold compression test I ran looks higher than another test I did not too long ago on a warmed up same engine, or maybe my compression tester is giving me false readings.
So seeing the leak down numbers on this cold engine should I assume that those numbers will get tighter than that? Not that I will go by that, I put everything back warm it up and re-do both tests this afternoon.
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#91
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #91
PonyGTrider said:
That makes sense, but have you or any of you find out this whole thing goes the opposite?
I’m saying this because comparing the cold compression test I ran looks higher than another test I did not too long ago on a warmed up same engine, or maybe my compression tester is giving me false readings.
So seeing the leak down numbers on this cold engine should I assume that those numbers will get tighter than that? Not that I will go by that, I put everything back warm it up and re-do both tests this afternoon.
Click to expand...
And here they are. Leak Down where did they leaked thru and compression tests:
Will this give a better idea if this is causing that awful fuel economy of 9.5 miles to the gallon????? Please comment on this and if this is the cause how would troubleshoot to fix it???

Thank you all for your attention and help!
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,960
2,920
194
Middle of Maine
Apr 17, 2026
#92
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #92
Something is off in this whole scenario. It just does not track. A 306 getting only 9ish mpg should have a much bigger trail of evidence showing up.
There is some important information missing.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider, nicholase, LILCBRA and 1 other person

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,904
10,558
203
polk county florida
Apr 17, 2026
#93
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #93
How many miles on this engine build?
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#94
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #94
Bullitt347 said:
Something is off in this whole scenario. It just does not track. A 306 getting only 9ish mpg should have a much bigger trail of evidence showing up.
There is some important information missing.
Click to expand...
I couldn’t agree more with that statement.
You can ask me what have I done to solve this mystery… I’ve done it! That’s why my frustration.
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#95
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #95
General karthief said:
How many miles on this engine build?
Click to expand...
I don’t have that fact but if I have to guess with good amount of certainty I would say somewhere around 65 - 70k

This goes out just cruising on weekends
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,960
2,920
194
Middle of Maine
Apr 17, 2026
#96
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #96
PonyGTrider said:
You can ask me what have I done to solve this mystery… I’ve done it!
Click to expand...
So, come clean then.
What information is missing that we have not seen yet?
What was the solution?
Or is this just an Epic Troll?
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,164
1,413
133
San Diego, CA
Apr 17, 2026
#97
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #97
I think he means he’s done everything he can think of and the problem is still there, and is out of ideas.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#98
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #98
Bullitt347 said:
So, come clean then.
What information is missing that we have not seen yet?
What was the solution?
Or is this just an Epic Troll?
Click to expand...
I wish this was a troll but it is not.
This is for real and I still have not find what the heck is going on.
Now I’m debating to either leave it as is or take everything apart.
Talking with a friend of mine he said from my compression results that cylinders 1 4 and 5 are on the low side and the computer is over fueling trying to compensate for their under load. It makes some sense but not sure.
I did perform a cylinder balance test and according to the computer all cylinders are contributing fine.
So, if you were me what would you do, leave it as it is or take it apart hone it, put new rings and replace all the rod and main bearings?????

Now speak up! I will be reading you all Thank you
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,862
3,992
183
Claremore, OK
Apr 17, 2026
#99
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #99
If you are wiling to tear it down then go for it. Honing the cylinders and then custom gaping some good rings on the stock pistons will for sure help. Take the heads to a shop and have them clean them up (deck, lap the valves, check the springs, and put new valve seals on them). I would also suggest a new oil pump and timing chain of which get high quality on both.

As for the ECU trying to compensate for the three cylinders being of lower compression but the cylinder balance test shows good then I doubt that. If the ECU even has this strategy it would have to show an imbalance to try and correct.

What is bothering me is that the compression tests are not jiving with the leak down test if the test equipment is known to be accurate and the tests were performed correctly. I know you had the motor at operating temp but I do not know how you did the testing. Biggest thing there is you have to make sure that both valves are close during the leak down test.

So here I would expect either Cylinder 1 to have less compression than Cylinder 4 or Cylinder 4 to have more compression than Cylinder 1
Cylinder 1 - 31% with 130 psi
Cylinder 4 - 17% with 130 psi

And here I would expect either Cylinder 1 to have less compression than Cylinder 5 or Cylinder 5 to have more compression than Cylinder 1
Cylinder 1 - 31% with 130 psi
Cylinder 5 - 21% with 120 psi

Those two examples are completely opposite of each other so needless to say it bothers me. Maybe I am reading into this completely wrong but its not what I have typically seen. Typically the less the leak down % is the higher the compression is.
 
Reactions: DadLife0724 and PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Apr 17, 2026
#100
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • #100
AeroCoupe said:
If you are wiling to tear it down then go for it. Honing the cylinders and then custom gaping some good rings on the stock pistons will for sure help. Take the heads to a shop and have them clean them up (deck, lap the valves, check the springs, and put new valve seals on them). I would also suggest a new oil pump and timing chain of which get high quality on both.

As for the ECU trying to compensate for the three cylinders being of lower compression but the cylinder balance test shows good then I doubt that. If the ECU even has this strategy it would have to show an imbalance to try and correct.

What is bothering me is that the compression tests are not jiving with the leak down test if the test equipment is known to be accurate and the tests were performed correctly. I know you had the motor at operating temp but I do not know how you did the testing. Biggest thing there is you have to make sure that both valves are close during the leak down test.

So here I would expect either Cylinder 1 to have less compression than Cylinder 4 or Cylinder 4 to have more compression than Cylinder 1
Cylinder 1 - 31% with 130 psi
Cylinder 4 - 17% with 130 psi

And here I would expect either Cylinder 1 to have less compression than Cylinder 5 or Cylinder 5 to have more compression than Cylinder 1
Cylinder 1 - 31% with 130 psi
Cylinder 5 - 21% with 120 psi

Those two examples are completely opposite of each other so needless to say it bothers me. Maybe I am reading into this completely wrong but its not what I have typically seen. Typically the less the leak down % is the higher the compression is.
Click to expand...
Yeah I’m tempted to take everything apart deglaze the cylinder walls by honing them and get some good file to fit rings.
On the other hand being only 3 cylinders on the low side I was thinking what if the 1st and second ring gaps got stuck aligned can you just re-position them and put them back in? Probably it is not worth the effort and better start with a new set of rings for all….
Yeah I was intrigued by the non sense between the leak down/compression tests but it is what I got putting every piston at TDC. The problem could be the cheap leak down tester I ordered, the percentage gauge needle was sticking up and was hard to calibrate so I had to take it apart and lubricate some brass gears and pins and ran a bit smoother but still I had to calibrate the meter almost for each cylinder may I created inconsistent reading because of that. On the other hand all the measured leak percentage was bleeding thru the rings not thru the valves so I know the valves were closed.

At this point I’m willing to go the extra mile if that will solve the pathetically poor fuel economy if those three cylinders are causing it.
 
Last edited: Apr 18, 2026
Reactions: DadLife0724
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 11
Next
First Prev 5 of 11 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
543
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
C
Fox Need help identifying brake setup
  • Cypher02xd
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
137
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2026
Mustang5L5
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
893
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
825
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?