• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

you've seen one pic of this '67 FB from SEMA

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68 & 00 GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 8, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jun 9, 2004
#21
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #21
68 & 00 GT said:
I do have a question. Why are you being such a cry baby ?

The point is obvius - to share these pics / info I found. Which is the entire point of SN.

BTW- nice 666 wannabe cool stay out of my threads from now on.
Click to expand...

I was asking a legit question man, not "flaming". Seriously, what you posted made no sense. "You've seen one pic from SEMA" - there have been several threads over the last couple of months about it, a couple after it was finished. Maybe what I should have said was "Pot roast"!

As for staying out of your threads, my reply is "green", which makes as much sense as this thread.

As for the personal snipe at my username, I haven't seen that level of immaturity since primary school. I do believe personal attacks are a no-no here.
 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Jun 10, 2004
#22
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #22
Route666 said:
I do believe personal attacks are a no-no here.
Click to expand...
hypocrite you started it - and the thread title makes perfect sense. As you said I'm sure everyone had seen this car once, just trying to share more pics. Please stop hijacking my thread w/

anyway how would I go about having seats like that made ?
or does anyone recognize these seats ?

 

69PaleHorse

Member
Feb 3, 2004
264
0
16
Ventura County, CA
Jun 10, 2004
#23
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #23
I believe those are the ProCar by Scat seats...

http://www.procarbyscat.com
 
T

The Hopkinator

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
146
0
0
NC
Jun 10, 2004
#24
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #24
That cars cool , but its an Eleanor rip off imho.

And 68OO and 666 , we will not tolerate ANY type of hostility here , if you two cant play nic,,,errrr,, wait a minute,,.... ok lets just forget all that .

DING DING DING !! Letssssss get ready too rumbllllllleeeeeeeee !!!
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jun 10, 2004
#25
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #25
Other than having a similar colored paint scheme and being a '67 Fastback, how's it a rip off? I'd take either, but the ebay car is a much smoother, detailed car in my opinion.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jun 10, 2004
#26
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #26
68 & 00 GT said:
hypocrite you started it - and the thread title makes perfect sense. As you said I'm sure everyone had seen this car once, just trying to share more pics. Please stop hijacking my thread w/

anyway how would I go about having seats like that made ?
or does anyone recognize these seats ?

Click to expand...

I rewrote my question before I posted it from "What is the point to this thread?" to "Do you have a question or is there a point other than showing us the car?" so that your fragile ego wouldn't get offended by my question, but it seems you did anyway. That's what I get for trying to help.

And how am I a hypocrite? I started by personally attacking you did I? Where in my first post did I say 68&00 is a dumba$$ or something similar?

BTW "you started it" shows another level of your maturity.

SORRY FOR ASKING A QUESTION YOU INSECURE TOOL.
 
V

vobraman

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
144
0
0
Jun 11, 2004
#27
  • Jun 11, 2004
  • #27
I was at Troy's shop on Wed. for a party he gave. Talkin about some rides, they were there. He had food, wine, beer, water and everything FOR FREE. The fast back was there and open for pic's, you could sit in the cars and talk freely with him. Great guy, just out of my budget.

Brian
 
T

The Hopkinator

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
146
0
0
NC
Jun 12, 2004
#28
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #28
1320stang said:
Other than having a similar colored paint scheme and being a '67 Fastback, how's it a rip off? I'd take either, but the ebay car is a much smoother, detailed car in my opinion.
Click to expand...

I agree somewhat, your correct it does have smoother lines , but they couldnt outright make a stone cold copy of Eleanor. Its the same Make. Same model . Same year . Same COLOR . If I were to create something as touted as the fastforward was, Id of used a 69 or 70, simply to avoid the present Eleanor hoopla. Still though, sharp car, but it doesnt hold a candle to Eleanor. Els more muscular looking , aggressive, etc. But then I am a bit smitten....
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jun 14, 2004
#29
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #29
The Hopkinator said:
I agree somewhat, your correct it does have smoother lines , but they couldnt outright make a stone cold copy of Eleanor. Its the same Make. Same model . Same year . Same COLOR . If I were to create something as touted as the fastforward was, Id of used a 69 or 70, simply to avoid the present Eleanor hoopla. Still though, sharp car, but it doesnt hold a candle to Eleanor. Els more muscular looking , aggressive, etc. But then I am a bit smitten....
Click to expand...


Ahh, but its not the same make and model. The Eleanor is a Shelby and a GT-500, they used a Ford Mustang. I see what you're saying though, but by that theory, anyone that takes a '67-'68 Fastback and does something really sano with it and has a corner carver look would be a Eleanor rip-off. The Ebay car doesn't have any of the ground effects other than a chin spoiler and those have been around for years. The lower scoops are molded in and in my personal opinion, look better than the bolt-on ones. I do like the second series Shelby scoops better than the first ones. Hey wait, isn't Eleanor a Shelby rip-off? Real GT-500 or no, you could never get one of those cars that looked like that.

I can't blame Troy for using a '67-'68, in my opinion that was the best looking Mustang model EVER. It has the Mustang look, but it's more aggressive, toned, muscular looking, sorta like me in the middle of college. The '69-'70 are agressive looking, but look like thy put on a few pounds (like me now. ) I'm still not sure I agree with what your doing Hop, but I'd take the car in a millisecond and I doubt I'd turn it back to original any time soon. I mean heck, if someone whined and asked me why I did that to my car I'd just say, "I didn't do it, Hop did. "
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
227
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
A Fox Quest! Find Vanilla Ice's 5oh
  • Noobz347
  • Jul 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
906
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2025
FastDriver
Engine Information that is Needed When You Post a "Car is not Running" or "Car is Running Poorly" Thread
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 4, 2025
Bullitt347
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
473
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
533
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?