• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Yup, another one of those threads......

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang70
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2004

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 19, 2004
#1
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #1
Desktop Dyno seems to be lowballing me with the combo I have planned. So I was wondering what you guys thought. I'm going to be running a 351W stroked to 427ci, AFR 205 heads, Victor Jr. manifold, Demon 750 mechanical secondary carb, Comp solid roller cam with .670" intake/.718" exhaust and 270* intake/284* exhaust. I know everyone is going to say the cam is huge. I got a good deal on it and I'm not totally commited to it just yet. This is just what I'm looking at right now. Oh, compression should be around 10:1. Thanks.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Aug 19, 2004
#2
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #2
10:1 will probably require flat top pistons, and with that much lift on the cam, you'll more than likely have to flycut them, but that's no problem.
Use a big fuel delivery system and a large exhaust system.
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Aug 19, 2004
#3
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #3
Well, I am rebuilding a 427w that came out of my bronco and it's going in my 65. I was going to go with the 205's but after speaking to several well known engine builders ( Troy @ FPS and Keith Craft) I bought the AFR 225's instead........something you might want to consider..........

Chris Barton
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Aug 19, 2004
#4
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #4
That big of cam will require a much higher cr. Consult the manufacturer. Sounds like a parts eater if you drive it on the street. Money to support that serious of a cam may make it not such a good deal. Would not be my choice.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 19, 2004
#5
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #5
I don't think you can trust Desktop Dyno to account for all the aftermarket possibilities out there.

Horsepower is just a number anyway. Not sure why people get so worked up about it.
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 19, 2004
#6
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #6
Like I said, I'm not totally commited to that cam yet. It's not like it would be too hard to sell it if I needed to. I thought about going with the 225's instead, but when I was talking to AFR they never even mentioned them. I'm not bolting this motor in front of a stock C4. I'm building up the rest of the drivetrain to match it.

As for the numbers thing, I'm not building this to impress everyone. I'm building it because it's what I want and I have a goal in mind. This is my car and it really doesn't bother me what other people think about. Heck, I've been told my car is ugly before. Whataya gonna do?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Aug 19, 2004
#7
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #7
From what I've read, DD is best for a comparison of two setups.. ie: will cam X make more power than cam Y? So while you may not get the hard numbers, you'll be able to tell whether the huge lift and duration you're planning will be useful.

Also, I've heard that plugging in the actual flow numbers for the heads from the manufacturer will probably give more accurate results.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 19, 2004
#8
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #8
Not sure if you can get headers for that combo that will flow anywhere near as well as the 225s.
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 19, 2004
#9
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #9
When I ran the numbers through DD it showed my power band to be where I wanted it. It showed the power peaking around 6000rpm. Which is where I want to keep it.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Aug 19, 2004
#10
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #10
Looks like that cam of mine caused you to go insane (building 427 strokers with mega cams and such). If theres anything I can to help, lemme know
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 19, 2004
#11
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #11
I just figured since I have it apart and I have the time I might as well do it the way I want. I'm tired of having a mediocore street rod. So I'm going to do the brakes, engine, tranny, rear end, etc..... I'll let you know if I need you to make a trip to Diego.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
G
Engine Another 393 stroker thread
  • GoldenGrande
  • Jun 2, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 2, 2019
GoldenGrande
G
M
408 Stroker build (what heads)
  • Mach1969
  • Feb 9, 2020
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
13K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2020
08GT500
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?