• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

10 best v-8 engines period the mighty 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter revedup
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
46
Northern KY
Jul 11, 2007
#61
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #61
blackened88lx said:
Oh yeah, 90% of them were very slow. But I believe the H.O. cars were 83-84 (would have destroyed a mustang of that period) and with a 5 spd they ran with the 87-93 Stangs.
Click to expand...


One of the Camaros i drove was the "Crossfire Injection" 305 which was the same injection setup used on the earlier '80s Corvettes...it had these cool vacuum operated scoops on the hood that would pop open when you matted the gas
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 11, 2007
#62
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #62
Modular2v said:
the only thing better than a dohc spinning at 6800rpm is a 5.0 spinning at 6800rpm
Click to expand...
You must not have heard one of the new 4.6L 3V's running hard yet. Waaaaayyyyy sexier than any stock 5.0L i've ever heard.
revedup said:
NOW A 4.6 IS WHAT 287 CUBES EVEN SMALER THAN EITHER THE 305 OR 302.
Click to expand...

That would be 281cid, my friend.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 11, 2007
#63
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #63
Gearbanger 101 said:
You must not have heard one of the new 4.6L 3V's running hard yet. Waaaaayyyyy sexier than any stock 5.0L i've ever heard.


That would be 281cid, my friend.
Click to expand...

i have heard the new 3valve motors! They dont impress me at all honestly
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
46
Northern KY
Jul 11, 2007
#64
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #64
The best thing to happen to a mod motor was the X pipe....i'd have to say it's not far behind the 5.0 in the sound dept.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 11, 2007
#65
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #65
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
The best thing to happen to a mod motor was the X pipe....i'd have to say it's not far behind the 5.0 in the sound dept.
Click to expand...

yep! Thats what i have on my 2v car! Everyone asks what brand of headers i have on it LOL (stock manifolds)
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Jul 11, 2007
#66
  • Jul 11, 2007
  • #66
I read a aritcle a few months ago where ford was going to release a bunch of push rod motors one was a 5.0 and one big block and i can't remember what the other one was.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Jul 12, 2007
#67
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #67
RS200 said:
That's because Jack Roush makes his millions off of a pushrod-dominated sport. Pushrods are going obsolete.

LS7 > 4.6 DOHC > 5.0
Click to expand...


Jack Roush said he thought Ford made a mistake cutting out the Pushrods and he wished that they had followed GM, I remember back in 96 when they interviewed Vic Edelbrock and he was saying the same thing thinking that Ford was making a big mistake going Completely Modular.
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
38
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#68
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #68
The LS7 is indeed a pushrod motor. GM has said that they cannot get anymore out of the LS engine; they have taken it as far as they can go (I'm assuming that means streetable). Next: NASCAR motors don't put out 850hp. 550hp, sure.

The reason for eliminating pushrods is simple: Less moving parts, better timing control and less power loss from the valvetrain. (It's almost like argueing roller rockers vs. solid lifters). It shouldn't really make that much of a difference. Same flow numbers, but higher RPM capability and less chance of internal damage. The number of pushrod engines has dramatically fallen since the 80s. I would say that pushrods are GOING obsolete (not already obsolete).

Jack Roush is doing just fine with the modular engines; does Edelbrock even make modular parts? (I'm too lazy to look it up)

And no, 305 Camaros aren't great. My brother has a 1984 Z/28 with the H.O. (VIN G) with a T5, and factory 3.73s. My 5.0 stayed dead even with it...with a stock AOD and 2.73s. The Camaro has to be a mid 15 second car. Sounds good, though.

LS1s make some of the sweetest sounds to ever come from an engine. The 3v isn't far behind.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Jul 12, 2007
#69
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #69
NASCAR is 750+ HP and the Busch Series is in the 550 Range. Jack Roush said he is just making due with what he has to work with but wishes that Ford had stuck with Push Rods, Edelbrock just does some exhaust and suspension stuff since Ford went Modular.
 

Nibbie

New Member
Mar 10, 2007
127
0
0
Jul 12, 2007
#70
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #70
what about a 460? dont know much about that behemoth, anybody think its anygood? 5.0s still rule, 305 camaro's suck, The only ones that ever gave me a decent run was a 350 w/an auto and he still lost but besides that, I have also thought of puting a stroked dohc 4.6 into my fox. But the problem is it will be way more money to do that then to just get a wicked 302 or 351 based motor and put it in my fox. well considering mods are the same for both motors.

*I want to smack myself for not buying that DOHC Teksid mod motor*
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
38
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#71
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #71
The 460 just plays into the "bigger is better" aka "no replacement for displacement" category. Sure it's a good motor when it's not in a van, and it makes big numbers when it's built. But it's big.

Hate to say it, but HP/L is a very fair way of rating these engines. Take a 1998 DOHC mod motor, or even a 2v motor against a 1998 Explorer with a 5.0. The 2v makes 225hp and 290 ft.lbs from 281ci. The Explorer motor makes 215hp and 288 ft.lbs of torque. My handy dandy calculator says the 4.6 is making 48.91hp/L and 63.04 ft.lbs/L versus the 5.0's 43hp/L and 57.6 ft.lbs/L. Same year engine, so the technologically advanced arugement does not apply.

Another arguement: Ford's 427 OHV vs. OHC. Which made more power?

The OHV arrangement makes sense in V-style engines, but not inline. I'll admit that OHV and OHC are pretty even in V-style (in all aspects, not just noise, longevity and power), but not inline. Multi-valve setups are for top-end power, not low-end. That's what variable valve timing is for. Opening a single valve favors low-end power production, and 2 valves (obviously) helps up top.

Sidenote: S2000's "crappy" motor makes 120HP/L and 69 ft.lbs/L Of course, that's at 7800 RPM, though. I like revs, not flooring it and not being able to get traction.
 

1.8kmint

New Member
May 31, 2007
47
0
0
Middletown, CA
Jul 12, 2007
#72
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #72
RS200 said:
And no, 305 Camaros aren't great. My brother has a 1984 Z/28 with the H.O. (VIN G) with a T5, and factory 3.73s. My 5.0 stayed dead even with it...with a stock AOD and 2.73s. The Camaro has to be a mid 15 second car. Sounds good, though.
QUOTE]

+1 I've driven an 87 modified iroc and pushed it hard but I can safely say my car would murder it even if the iroc seemed faster and was louder.

All show no go (they do sound good though)
Click to expand...
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Jul 12, 2007
#73
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #73
1.8kmint said:
RS200 said:
And no, 305 Camaros aren't great. My brother has a 1984 Z/28 with the H.O. (VIN G) with a T5, and factory 3.73s. My 5.0 stayed dead even with it...with a stock AOD and 2.73s. The Camaro has to be a mid 15 second car. Sounds good, though.
QUOTE]

+1 I've driven an 87 modified iroc and pushed it hard but I can safely say my car would murder it even if the iroc seemed faster and was louder.

All show no go (they do sound good though)
Click to expand...
I am glad you boys are starting to chime in. I am laughing at the thought of the 305's being even remotely fast. I have even raced em in my v-6 with bold ons and won! I have driven and ridden in about 4 and can also safely say compared to the 4 5.0's I have owned and the 10 I have driven never has a stock 305 even come close to beating a stock 5.0. Well I guess if you want to go specs in 1988 the 305 had a whopping 170 hp oh that would be why it beats the 225 in the GT Must be the torque then... well, darn it all it only had 255 in contrast to the 300 in the GT. If you wanted to pull the weight card the iroc z weighed 3228. Not lighter than the 5.0 either, but over all I can see how you would think it was faster...

Edit: 305 FTMFL
Click to expand...
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
38
Connecticut
Jul 12, 2007
#74
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #74
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
One of the Camaros i drove was the "Crossfire Injection" 305 which was the same injection setup used on the earlier '80s Corvettes...it had these cool vacuum operated scoops on the hood that would pop open when you matted the gas
Click to expand...

Oh god haha. Crossfire injection is a joke.

RS200 said:
Next: NASCAR motors don't put out 850hp. 550hp, sure.
Click to expand...
Shakerhood said:
NASCAR is 750+ HP and the Busch Series is in the 550 Range.
Click to expand...
My brother works in Nascar so believe me, I have all the info. The last time Nascar did a dyno session with the top teams it was north of 800-850hp, and the Busch cars aren't too far behind. They're probably 700+. All of your theory on pushrods vs OHC sounds great, but the cup cars spin to 9500 rpm on a regular basis, and I've seen them closer to 10k. There are also a few drag classes with small blocks spinning to 10k. Show me some mod motors putitng out that rpm.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#75
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #75
I really dig the sounds of the 4.6, esp the Bullet... Still a 5.0L with Magnaflows


Besides the small block ford was first made in 1962 (221 cubic inches) 45 freaking years lol

Also nearly 280hp out of a 289 High Performance (4.8L) what is that 60HP per Liter... That's waay better than a mod motor, isn't it and the 289 is how old now?


[homer]You can use stats to prove anything, 99% of people know this[/homer]
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
46
Northern KY
Jul 12, 2007
#76
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #76
blackened88lx said:
Oh god haha. Crossfire injection is a joke.
Click to expand...


Yeah, i opened the hood expecting something cool....it's more or less like a duel 2 barrel throttle body setup....big deal lol.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jul 12, 2007
#77
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #77
Nascar motors have some pretty serious parts that allow that kind of RPM. Shaft mount rockers, insane bee-hive springs, titanium valve & components, light weight rotating assembly thats perfectly balanced and one insane cam that probably doesn't make any power until 5000rpm. Not to mention the work done to the Heads, intake, and carb. Those motors do put down some insane power numbers well over 800hp.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#78
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #78
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yeah, i opened the hood expecting something cool....it's more or less like a duel 2 barrel throttle body setup....big deal lol.
Click to expand...

don't make fun

View attachment 377408

Where is that sound file of the camaro owner talking on some radio show, "My camaro has special wax to stop radar" or something, man that was funny...
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 12, 2007
#79
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #79
Boss 351 said:
don't make fun

View attachment 377406

Where is that sound file of the camaro owner talking on some radio show, "My camaro has special wax to stop radar" or something, man that was funny...
Click to expand...

hahah that is funny as hell. Someone needs to post a link to that radio talk clip! HILARIOUS!
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
41
Montgomery, NY
Jul 12, 2007
#80
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #80
A 305 TPI with a 5-speed should run side by side with a 5.0, drivers race...

The L69 HO motors from the early to mid 80s also ran decent numbers.

A 305 TPI with an auto isnt bad, but dont look at the peanut cam 86s, they were somewhat slower.

I have seen enough ragged out mid to high 15 second fox bodies to know when to not throw stones!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
164
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
641
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Engine Engine rebuild suggestions
  • JulianR
  • Mar 3, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 20 21 22
Replies
434
Views
41K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 26, 2024
JulianR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?