• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

15 or Less MPG? Something Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94GTLaserRC
  • Start date Start date Nov 3, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 3, 2010
#1
  • Nov 3, 2010
  • #1
Well, unless that "MPG" average on your gauge is wrong, Something's up. Ive driven over 250 miles so far and the best reading Ive had was about 17, but it hangs out around 14-15 mpg. I thought City was supposed to be 18? Ive hardly gotten on it..still breaking it in. Is this normal or is that gauge estimate just not right?
RC
 
K

kyle_99gt

Member
Nov 4, 2008
166
1
16
Nov 3, 2010
#2
  • Nov 3, 2010
  • #2
it also depends on how hard your driving, if you have a lead foot you could see as low as 10 mpg i bet lol. Also it will go up a bit once it has been broken in.
 
C

cdog1157

New Member
Jul 28, 2010
27
0
0
Nov 3, 2010
#3
  • Nov 3, 2010
  • #3
I've never gotten it above 19mpg and I've got 1300 miles on it, even going extremely easy on it for a whole tank of gas (that's when I got 19mpg). If you reset the average mpg while you're on the interstate then it'll go up. I also did an average on how much gas it took to fill up and how many miles I'd driven and it was dead on with the gauge. It's hard for me to believe people are getting mid 20's cuz I usually average 16.5 and I don't drive it hard at all compared to most.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Nov 4, 2010
#4
  • Nov 4, 2010
  • #4
I'm getting around 17-18 with the 3.73s and drive the car pretty hard. I am about to roll over 3k miles
 

Benny

Founding Member
Jun 1, 2001
414
0
16
Katy, Texas
Nov 4, 2010
#5
  • Nov 4, 2010
  • #5
I maybe wrong but I think when they rate MPG they use REAL fuel not 10% Ethenol which will average around 2 mpg less than the rating
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 4, 2010
#6
  • Nov 4, 2010
  • #6
Oh well, I didnt buy it for the MPG, but I was excited to know that the "LOW" end of the range was still close to 20. I was hoping for the minimum 18, but We'll see after a few hundred miles.
RC
 
R

RaceRed50

New Member
Sep 5, 2010
29
0
1
Nov 4, 2010
#7
  • Nov 4, 2010
  • #7
Im averaging about 18 city.
 
S

stanmckinney

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,188
5
49
Nov 4, 2010
#8
  • Nov 4, 2010
  • #8
What people say they get and what they actually get are often two different things. I have had several GT Mustangs. My 2007 in town rarely got over 14 MPG. I am getting a bit less than that with my 2010. I only drive about three miles to work and three home, so that is a reason for perhaps a bit lower than one might hope. On the road, the 2007 on occasion would get 26 MPG but mostly about 24. The best I have seen so far with the 2010, with 3,000 miles on it, is about 24.
I do use the 10 percent ethanol. I had not thought about that issue.
 

captbill51

Member
Aug 19, 2010
69
0
7
Acton, MA
Nov 7, 2010
#9
  • Nov 7, 2010
  • #9
MPG

I thought it was me! On my F250 with a 5.4 I get 15 on the highway. WELL I tried to be good and drove three hundred miles thru NH last weekend and only got 17.5. Didn't buy it for the mileage.
 

Todd95GT

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2000
258
0
16
Mystic,CT
Nov 7, 2010
#10
  • Nov 7, 2010
  • #10
I'm getting 21 or better on my 11GT with 3.55's and 1500 miles on the car with about 30% highway. My girl gets 19 at best with 11GT Vert 3.31 aslo with 1500. I was hitting it hard this last tank full and still got 20. She drove her car last night and I know she's the reason for her milage she loves to run the RPMs up to 4k just crusing. When I'm not driving hard I'm in 6th and shift around 2k.
 
U

unas2k5

New Member
Feb 6, 2010
80
0
0
Nov 7, 2010
#11
  • Nov 7, 2010
  • #11
Todd95GT said:
I'm getting 21 or better on my 11GT with 3.55's and 1500 miles on the car with about 30% highway. My girl gets 19 at best with 11GT Vert 3.31 aslo with 1500. I was hitting it hard this last tank full and still got 20. She drove her car last night and I know she's the reason for her milage she loves to run the RPMs up to 4k just crusing. When I'm not driving hard I'm in 6th and shift around 2k.
Click to expand...

What are the 3.55 like? I'm thinking about getting 3.55's.

Thanks.
 

eric n

Founding Member
Jul 14, 2001
875
2
19
Bakersfield, CA
Nov 7, 2010
#12
  • Nov 7, 2010
  • #12
I get 15 as a daily driver, like others around 30% freeway, I drive reasonably like a grand father most of the time, getting on it very occasionally. On long freeway trips I'm looking at 20+. I guess this is about as good as it's going to get. 4000+ miles.
 

Todd95GT

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2000
258
0
16
Mystic,CT
Nov 7, 2010
#13
  • Nov 7, 2010
  • #13
unas2k5 said:
What are the 3.55 like? I'm thinking about getting 3.55's.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

I like them way better than the 3.31's in the her Vert but if I was to change her's it would be 3.73. My car is faster than hers to the piont she asked me about it after driving my car.
 
U

unas2k5

New Member
Feb 6, 2010
80
0
0
Nov 8, 2010
#14
  • Nov 8, 2010
  • #14
Todd95GT said:
I like them way better than the 3.31's in the her Vert but if I was to change her's it would be 3.73. My car is faster than hers to the piont she asked me about it after driving my car.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the reply!
I'm going with the 3.55's.
 
R

redcandystang5.0

Member
Nov 3, 2010
61
0
6
Maryland
Nov 11, 2010
#15
  • Nov 11, 2010
  • #15
I drove my car home to maryland from florida. 1,100 miles. mine said 20.6 - 20.7 all the way. I also got 20.6 for the first couple days driving around at home. I shift easy @ 2-2.500 rpm's an occasional 3-4000. Then yesterday I was driving normal and i saw the display drop . it kept dropping every few seconds down to 10 something. Whats up with that? I reset it and it wont go over 15????
My car does have a tune on it but i was getting 20 when i picked it up????
 

Coyote5.0

5 Year Member
Aug 27, 2010
625
102
64
Portage, Wisconsin
Nov 12, 2010
#16
  • Nov 12, 2010
  • #16
I've got about 400 miles on my 2011. I averaged 25 (mostly back roads) on the first tank, with the computer saying 24. The computer is showing 25 on the second tank (with 10% ethanol). It's lower than I was expecting, as the 2005 GT I drove before (which is rated 3 MPG lower than the new one) was getting 27-29 under the same conditions. Hopefully it will loosen up more as it gets more miles on it.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 13, 2010
#17
  • Nov 13, 2010
  • #17
Well, if I average out the miles driven with the gallons when I fill the tank, the First full tank was about 14.6 mpg. This second tank was 17.2. In the owner's manual, it specifically states that the best fuel efficiency wont be realized until about 1000-1500 miles on the engine, which according to Steeda, is about the time when the engine will get to it's max. performance.

RC
 

jbrillo

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
229
1
18
Houston
Nov 13, 2010
#18
  • Nov 13, 2010
  • #18
I was going to say that I noticed my MPG's went up after around the 1K mile mark. I have 3.73's. If I really baby it, I can get 18-MPG city. The best I've managed on the highway is 24-mpg. My 2010 GT had 3.73's and on a trip to Austin I actually got 26-MPG!!!!! But the 2011 is ALOT more fun to drive! I'd say it equals out. The most I've gotten out of a tank of gas is 320-miles with a 50/50 mix of city & hwy driving. I imagine the MPG may get slightly better as the engine gets looser. Maybe 1mpg better by 20-30K miles-ish.
 
V

VTHokie

New Member
Apr 4, 2011
2
0
0
Apr 5, 2011
#19
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #19
Something to keep in mind is that the 3.73 and 3.55 rears will hurt your economy and EPA doesn't test the Stang with those rears just the stock ones. City economy shouldn't take too big of a hit as you can still force the revs low but when you're on the highway and running in 6th those upgraded rear ends will hurt the fuel economy as your turning higher revs than you would stock. And for the most part, higher revs equals worse fuel economy.
Like everyone else has been saying though, you're not getting a 5.0 for fuel economy
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Apr 5, 2011
#20
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #20
This was before gears. On a twenty minute hwy stretch yesterday gauge indicated about 21 mpg. Not bad.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LESS THAN 9.5 MPG CITY DRIVING!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 15, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
92
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2023
PonyGTrider
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Lifter tick
  • Creomod
  • Sep 4, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 6, 2021
Creomod
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?