• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2 questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Texstang9682
  • Start date Start date Apr 1, 2009

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Apr 1, 2009
#1
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #1
first my car's fuel pump crapped out on me recently. So I'm just going to go ahead and get a 255. Now, is this going to effect my gas mileage or is it just going to give me more availible capasity. BTW I still have stock injectors. I just plan on supercharging the car later. So thoughts on possible decreased mileage?

And also How do yall feel about solid motor mounts. The reason I ask is because my factory ones have started to sag some and therfore with me having longtube headers has caused the passenger side header to have a small hole in it from rubing on the frame or somthing. And I dont want this happening again since it's so hard to take the header out and re weld it. And also I'd rather not get poly ones cause of the price. With all the suspesions work I have on my car I kinda dont mind the extra vibration. It's already got plenty so a little more wont bother me.

Thanks, CLINT
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,338
413
164
Joplin, Missouri
Apr 1, 2009
#2
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #2
Do the 255 fuel pump, I'm assuming you have a 96-mid 98 that has a return style fuel system, so any fuel not used just goes back to the tank. No mileage affected at all.

Do not do solid motor mounts on a daily driven street car. Do the poly bushings and once u replace them your header should not rub anymore.
 
B

bboylobo

New Member
May 4, 2005
130
0
0
Lancaster PA
Apr 1, 2009
#3
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #3
is there a return for a 2001 gt. Would i see gas mileage go down if i put the same fuel pump?
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,338
413
164
Joplin, Missouri
Apr 1, 2009
#4
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #4
mid 98-04 all share the same system, returnLESS. You cannot run the same pump as a return style system.


A bigger pump will not mean a decrease in fuel mileage. Only actual consumption or a poor tune will.
 

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Apr 1, 2009
#5
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #5
thanks on the info guys I appeciate it. Are you sure about the motor mounts. I dont mind vibration at all. and dont want to spend the money on the poly mounts.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Apr 1, 2009
#6
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #6
You'll wind up regretting solid mounts on a daily driver. The vibration you get isn't annoying to you but your drivetrain will hate you for it. Could lead to other issues down the road.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Apr 1, 2009
#7
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #7
1+ on the solid mounts. i put a solid trans mount in mine, drove it 2 miles down the road, hit autozone and bought a new rubber mount. the solid trans mount saw about 45mins of life in my car and it got chunked in the dumpster. (the old mount was trash thats why i bought the solid then the rubber)
 

fasthippo

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
52
1
0
OC, CA
Apr 1, 2009
#8
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #8
no engine will lose gas mileage just from a more powerful fuel pump. your car only burns as much fuel as it thinks it needs, making more fuel available wont change that. whether its a return line or not, excess fuel will stay in the tank.
 

Texstang9682

New Member
Oct 8, 2006
115
0
0
Austin, Texas
Apr 2, 2009
#9
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #9
COramprat said:
You'll wind up regretting solid mounts on a daily driver. The vibration you get isn't annoying to you but your drivetrain will hate you for it. Could lead to other issues down the road.
Click to expand...

OK then Polyurethane it is. Have any of yall gotten the ones of of ebay or some other non-name brand other than the evergy suspension ones? Any difference in quality?
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,338
413
164
Joplin, Missouri
Apr 2, 2009
#10
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #10
I have autozone/oreilly special rubber mounts in my car. Too cheap for poly. Sorry no help there. I'd imagine they are all fairly close in quality, but then again I have no clue for sure......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Vibration after new clutch
  • nipple_looker
  • Sep 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
517
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 26, 2026
fasterthangas
F
New Exhaust for 408w stroker
  • SadbutTrue
  • Sep 10, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
115
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 10, 2026
nickyb
T
Vibrating clutch pedal
  • t.hite10
  • Aug 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
208
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 11, 2026
squeak93
Engine Keeping O2 sensors lit with long tube headers
  • keel
  • Jul 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
224
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2026
Qtrhrse23
S
Brakes 80 Mustang 4.2 rear chassis brake line for 5 lug conversion!
  • StangPowerLSX510
  • Aug 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
138
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 9, 2026
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?