• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2001 gt engine swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldschoolmuscle
  • Start date Start date Sep 28, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last

Turbo92PGT

Member
Feb 17, 2003
746
0
16
Auburn Washington
Sep 30, 2005
#21
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #21
the torx bolts holding everything together on that engine must be why it weighs less lol torx = teh lose
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 30, 2005
#22
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #22
Its alright gearbanger....these guys are not REAL mustang entheustists. They dont desirve to even drive a stang.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 30, 2005
#23
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #23
ponysarepretty said:
FORD
The 5.4 Navigator engine weighs: 660lbs (frp)
300 hp 5000 rpm
355 ft-lbs 2750 rpm
$4,395.00

4.6 Aviator Motor: 672 lbs (dunno why its heavier than the 5.4 which is cast in iron)
302 hp 5750 rpm
300 ft-lbs. 3250 rpm
$5,495.00

4.6 Mach 1 Motor: 618 lbs
305 HP @ 5800 RPM
320 ft./lbs. of torque @ 4200 RPM
$5,200.00

5.0 Cammer: 669 lbs
400 hp
365 ft/lbs
$14,995.00

GM:
LS1: ~380 lbs
350 HP @ 5800 RPM
385 Lb-Ft @ 4400 RPM
$6,672.50

LS7: ~480 lbs
500 HP
475 LB-FT
I hear it about 12k, so same cost as the cammer.

The Chevy engines weigh less, cost a little bit more
Click to expand...
Let me ask you though....are these both fully dressed weights....accessories and all? I can dead lift my long block 4.6L SOHC, iron block with moderate effort (had to the other day actually ) without the accessories on it….and there’s no way it weighed anywhere close to 600lbs. A 5.4L DOHC aluminum block with 4-valve heads, extra cams and larger timing cover, etc, etc can’t be more than another 80lbs over the SOHC. I’ll bet anything that those Ford engine weights quoted above are with full accessories and bracketry, where the GM engines are rated without?
 

ponysarepretty

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
578
0
0
Sep 30, 2005
#24
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #24
Gearbanger 101 said:
Let me ask you though....are these both fully dressed weights....accessories and all? I can dead lift my long block 4.6L SOHC, iron block with moderate effort (had to the other day actually ) without the accessories on it….and there’s no way it weighed anywhere close to 600lbs. A 5.4L DOHC aluminum block with 4-valve heads, extra cams and larger timing cover, etc, etc can’t be more than another 80lbs over the SOHC. I’ll bet anything that those Ford engine weights quoted above are with full accessories and bracketry, where the GM engines are rated without?
Click to expand...

Probably... why the hell would your deadlift a shortblock??... seems a bit superflous does it not?

I'm not trying to say the mustang is bad or anything, I am trying to say that the LS1 is a better enginethan the 4.6 2V, just like a LS7 will always be better than an LS2.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 30, 2005
#25
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #25
ponysarepretty said:
Probably... why the hell would your deadlift a shortblock??... seems a bit superflous does it not?
Click to expand...
It was actually a long-block and it wasn't until said newly built long-block was sitting on the ground outside, because I had put it there temporarily while cleaning out the garage and had noticed only after it had begun to rain.....that my engine lift was now buried and inaccessible at the rear of the shop. That was probably the longest 15-feet I've ever had to walk.

As far as the LS1 being better.....I'll concede to it being more powerful than a SOHC, but that's where our consensus on the subject ends.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Sep 30, 2005
#26
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #26
ponysarepretty said:
Probably... why the hell would your deadlift a shortblock??... seems a bit superflous does it not?
Click to expand...
Geez, when Brian said he was gonna throw a new engine in his car, I didn't think he meant literally "throw it in"
 

ponysarepretty

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
578
0
0
Oct 1, 2005
#27
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #27
Gearbanger 101 said:
It was actually a long-block and it wasn't until said newly built long-block was sitting on the ground outside, because I had put it there temporarily while cleaning out the garage and had noticed only after it had begun to rain.....that my engine lift was now buried and inaccessible at the rear of the shop. That was probably the longest 15-feet I've ever had to walk.

As far as the LS1 being better.....I'll concede to it being more powerful than a SOHC, but that's where our consensus on the subject ends.
Click to expand...

And more power than a DOHC

A good engine is a good engine
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Oct 1, 2005
#28
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #28
Gearbanger 101 said:
Let me ask you though....are these both fully dressed weights....accessories and all? I can dead lift my long block 4.6L SOHC, iron block with moderate effort (had to the other day actually ) without the accessories on it….and there’s no way it weighed anywhere close to 600lbs. A 5.4L DOHC aluminum block with 4-valve heads, extra cams and larger timing cover, etc, etc can’t be more than another 80lbs over the SOHC. I’ll bet anything that those Ford engine weights quoted above are with full accessories and bracketry, where the GM engines are rated without?
Click to expand...
regardless, the Ls engines do weigh in at less, fully dressed. They are becoming very popular over here with kit cars for that very reason.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Oct 1, 2005
#29
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #29
i've know they could fit a LS1 in the front bay but i didn't think it would that roomy.... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm maybe i should get a LS1 block
 

ponysarepretty

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
578
0
0
Oct 1, 2005
#30
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #30
300bhp/ton said:
regardless, the Ls engines do weigh in at less, fully dressed. They are becoming very popular over here with kit cars for that very reason.
Click to expand...

As a generalization, pushrod weighs less than overhead cam.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Oct 1, 2005
#31
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #31
just weighed one of the DOHC heads off my Cobra

Having: header, cams, sprockets, coil pack. Missing: valve cover, head bolts, gaskets,

68lbs
 
C

CrazyHorn

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
184
1
0
Gatineau
Oct 1, 2005
#32
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #32
I got to say I like the idea of a ls1 in a stang, why not, its a good engine and they are good on gas.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Oct 1, 2005
#33
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #33
it's still not emissions legal anyway, say goodbye to daily driving
 

ponysarepretty

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
578
0
0
Oct 1, 2005
#34
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #34
tomustang said:
it's still not emissions legal anyway, say goodbye to daily driving
Click to expand...

Register as a kit car, an O/R X pipe isn't legal either, doesn't stop people there.

There is a reason a lot of cobra replicas use small blocks.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Oct 1, 2005
#35
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #35
if you are a mechanical engineer with all of the fabrication tools available, then by all means do it. you will need access to all feedback items(the little stuff) to make it work.

ANYTHING can be done. a 1956 dodge 392 hemi will fit, but why?

i have some questions for you. assume it can be done.

locations for things such as oil pan. what oil pan will you use? chevy is ALIEN to ford. who is going to fab the proper volume and insure no oil interference with the crank. also where are you going to get the custom oil feed tube and pick-up? what about oil starvation? also you currently have a ford modulated fuel pump, how do you work it with chevy? convert to return system. also does the drivers side exhaust hit the steering rod? what about the tranny tunnel? does the chevy bellhousing clear it? getting a custom driveshaft is easy. tranny mount and location ? what about throw out system for clutch ? location of shifter port in body? i guess the tranny is the same type but different bellhousing size. torque for 5.7l is higheer than 4.6, what about rear end durability? i mean spider gears.

LS1 V8 n/a 480lbs.
explorer aluminum crate motor 530 lbs.
dohc 576 lbs.
sohc mustang 600 lbs.


just asking. of course it can be done.nice project. how long do you think it will take to do all those things? maybe there is a kit.
or maybe do a 32 ford kit car.
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 17, 2005
#36
  • Dec 17, 2005
  • #36
billfisher said:
locations for things such as oil pan. what oil pan will you use? chevy is ALIEN to ford. who is going to fab the proper volume and insure no oil interference with the crank. also where are you going to get the custom oil feed tube and pick-up? what about oil starvation? also you currently have a ford modulated fuel pump, how do you work it with chevy? convert to return system. also does the drivers side exhaust hit the steering rod? what about the tranny tunnel? does the chevy bellhousing clear it? getting a custom driveshaft is easy. tranny mount and location ? what about throw out system for clutch ? location of shifter port in body? i guess the tranny is the same type but different bellhousing size. torque for 5.7l is higheer than 4.6, what about rear end durability? i mean spider gears.
Click to expand...

I just started doing research for this swap so i have answers to these question.

1. An aftermarket k-member should be used for the swap. In doing so the stock f-body oil pan will fit.

2. The fuel system will have to be changed to return style with aftermarket rails and fuel pressure regulater. The fuel system just needs to be hooked up to a 12V key on source to work. The ls1 computer will run the motor and wont need any tuning. Although there is a company that can modify the ls1 harness to put the eec where the factory ford eec is. And you dont necessarily have to do this. The ls1 eec is in the engine compartment on f-bodies anyways.

3. The drivers side header will hit the steering shaft with aftermarket ls1 headers. Ways around this are stock ls1 headers which fit. But the 3 bolt flange needs to be grinded down. Or 351w headers. You have to cut the flange off and have an exhaust shop weld ls1 flanges on in their place. The spacing on the exhaust ports are the same for an ls1 and a 351w.

4. No clearencing needs to be done for the tranny to fit in the tunnel. However a little bit of the shifter hole has to be cut back for the shifter to bolt up. That requires a dremel or cutoff wheel. Not necessarily special tools either.

5. The rear end should be upgraded regardless. People blow them with stock 4.6's anyways.

Ang the only thing that is posing a problem with this swap is the hydraulic clutch. You can use a lt1 setup for the t56 which allows the use of a clutch fork setup like fords. However I have yet to find someone who has done it.

Modifying you stock clutch setup to work with the hydraulic ls1 parts seems to be the only way. Alot of people have mentioned the use of turbo coupe parts but noneone has actually gotten that type of setup running either.

Another way is to use a tko trannie with a chevy 350 mcleud bellhousing. And you can get the required clutch and clutch quadrant parts to fit for your application.

Just adding tech to this thread. I am in no way flaming you billfisher. Just answering your questions.

Dan.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Dec 18, 2005
#37
  • Dec 18, 2005
  • #37
Numbles said:
I just started doing research for this swap so i have answers to these question.

1. An aftermarket k-member should be used for the swap. In doing so the stock f-body oil pan will fit.

2. The fuel system will have to be changed to return style with aftermarket rails and fuel pressure regulater. The fuel system just needs to be hooked up to a 12V key on source to work. The ls1 computer will run the motor and wont need any tuning. Although there is a company that can modify the ls1 harness to put the eec where the factory ford eec is. And you dont necessarily have to do this. The ls1 eec is in the engine compartment on f-bodies anyways.

3. The drivers side header will hit the steering shaft with aftermarket ls1 headers. Ways around this are stock ls1 headers which fit. But the 3 bolt flange needs to be grinded down. Or 351w headers. You have to cut the flange off and have an exhaust shop weld ls1 flanges on in their place. The spacing on the exhaust ports are the same for an ls1 and a 351w.

4. No clearencing needs to be done for the tranny to fit in the tunnel. However a little bit of the shifter hole has to be cut back for the shifter to bolt up. That requires a dremel or cutoff wheel. Not necessarily special tools either.

5. The rear end should be upgraded regardless. People blow them with stock 4.6's anyways.

Ang the only thing that is posing a problem with this swap is the hydraulic clutch. You can use a lt1 setup for the t56 which allows the use of a clutch fork setup like fords. However I have yet to find someone who has done it.

Modifying you stock clutch setup to work with the hydraulic ls1 parts seems to be the only way. Alot of people have mentioned the use of turbo coupe parts but noneone has actually gotten that type of setup running either.

Another way is to use a tko trannie with a chevy 350 mcleud bellhousing. And you can get the required clutch and clutch quadrant parts to fit for your application.

Just adding tech to this thread. I am in no way flaming you billfisher. Just answering your questions.

Dan.
Click to expand...

Any thoughts on by passing the hydra-boost for the brakes?
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 18, 2005
#38
  • Dec 18, 2005
  • #38
CanadaStang said:
Any thoughts on by passing the hydra-boost for the brakes?
Click to expand...

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286585

Look through this link posted earlier in this thread.

You can also use vacuum booster from a v6 94/95gt stangs. And then just use the power steering pump from the ls1 motor for steering only.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Dec 18, 2005
#39
  • Dec 18, 2005
  • #39
lots of good answers, but my 5.4 3v will kill any ls smaller than 7 litres. i can bore it also. 380 cubes i believe. so why do i want a chevy motor? if you have the skill and pocket book then why not 5.4 4v. they make 885 hp and 8500 rpms. there aren't any real advantages to chevy. i can mod for mod out power them. i started at 325 hp.

i am stepped long tubes, 85mm TB, 24lb injectors, lihtning MAF, and cams away from 425hp. try that with a stock headed 5.3 or 5.7 chevy.

the 6.0 already has the good heads,ls-6 intake, and cams. not much left there.

of course more is available, but the point is i can make more pre mod. so chevy really still sucks.

BTW i enjoy flaming. so go at it dude.
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 18, 2005
#40
  • Dec 18, 2005
  • #40
Billfisher. I was just adding tech to the thread. And this is the tech section. If you want to bench race start a thread in the talk section.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 2 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Falls on its face at WOT
  • luvformypit
  • Sep 29, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
416
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2024
luvformypit
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
T
Hey from Arkansas!
  • TrueBlue01GT!
  • Apr 17, 2023
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Apr 17, 2023
Potomus Pete
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?