• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

281 HP & Stuck -- Suggestions please ??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pops Fun
  • Start date Start date Mar 14, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Mar 16, 2004
#41
  • Mar 16, 2004
  • #41
zenboy99 said:
That was exactly my thinking, I agree with Killer.
Click to expand...


when in doubt, agree with PAUL!
RC
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Mar 17, 2004
#42
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #42
randomjoker said:
Pops Fun, is your car an auto?
Click to expand...

Hi,
Car is a 5-speed.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 17, 2004
#43
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #43
Killercanary said:
You need to either start turning some more RPM's (which will be limited by the cobra intake) and put in a matching cam to take advantage of the head flow, or add some cubes to the thing, or up the compression a good bit.
Click to expand...

He said the intake was heavily ported also. If done right to match the heads, it should not be a restriction to flow.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 17, 2004
#44
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #44
Not flow Tom, but rather high RPM potential. The cobra intake is not going to be a good choice for a combo that has the flow and capabilty to rev to say 6500, that was my point.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 17, 2004
#45
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #45
Same-same to me Paul - a properly ported Cobra should make good torque/power to 6,500 rpm - reach for 7,000+ rpm and it's different. Maybe not as much peak as a shorter runner with larger cross section but going by only peak numbers is a mistake in my book - averages under the 2,000-6,500 rpm curve are the best comparison.
 

randomjoker

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
427
0
0
Oklahoma
Mar 17, 2004
#46
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #46
Pops Fun said:
Hi,
Car is a 5-speed.
Click to expand...

then why the hell is ur ET so high :/

did you take off your front sway bar on that 14.7 run?

how much does your car weigh w/driver?
 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
2,723
0
0
Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)
Mar 17, 2004
#47
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #47
Numbers, numbers, numbers, what do they mean?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 17, 2004
#48
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #48
Tom, do you know of any cobra intakes that pull that high??? You know me above all people believe more in average power and area under the curve than peak. I don't see how a cobra intake, with the runner length it has, is going to be able to support a 302 H/C car up to 6500-7000. I could be wrong though...
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Mar 17, 2004
#49
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #49
Hi guys

I'm in the same boat here. I have a 95 GTS and I just modded her up last summer. I have a Trick Flow Track heat intake, Canfield heads(2.02 valves) match ported to intake (have flow numbers), stage 1 TFS cam .499, MSD 6AL, 24# injectors, 255 lph pump, BBK cold air intake, BBK 70 mm TB, 75 mm Pro-M mass, Kirban pullies, catted X-pipe, Mac shorties, Flomaster cat back 2 chamber mufflers, 355's.

I dyno'd 280 rwhp and 317 rwtrq. I didn't have the pullies at that time so lets say maybe I'm at 285 rwhp now. The TFS cam I have is very mild and I'm not even close to taking advantage of all that beautiful port work I've had done. The other thing I've noticed since the mods is oil consumption has increased. I thing the intake is sucking some in through the PCV valve since aftermarket intakes do crrwate more vaccuum. Anyway I'm leaning towards either a custom grind or just going for the Ford Camzilla Z cam.

My best ET is 13.6 @ 104.6 mph with an almost 2.2 60 ft time. I think my cam isn't performing and my trap speed should be at least 107 mph. I also want to break the 300 rwhp barrier. I should add I'm running with stock computer and stock fuel pressure regulator and my A/F is 13.5:1.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 17, 2004
#50
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #50
Sounds like you have the same problem as Pops Fun. Heavily ported heads and intake and cam that can't keep up. A bigger cam probably would help, but you'll probably still have a not so great low end. Just goes to show that high flow numbers don't mean everything on a 302.

Jake
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 17, 2004
#51
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #51
db
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Mar 17, 2004
#52
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #52
I'm sure the high flow numbers matter but you need the cam to utilize all that breathability. I also have 1.6 rockers. I wouldn't say the heads were heavily ported but they were ported to match the TFS stage 1 cam. I also went with 54 CC heads to increase compression since I don't plan on going forced induction.

My flow numbers are as follows

0.100 73
0.200 137
0.300 193
0.400 247
0.500 279
0.550 281

I think the z cam may help me here.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 17, 2004
#53
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #53
Killercanary said:
Tom, do you know of any cobra intakes that pull that high??? You know me above all people believe more in average power and area under the curve than peak. I don't see how a cobra intake, with the runner length it has, is going to be able to support a 302 H/C car up to 6500-7000. I could be wrong though...
Click to expand...

Yes, I have a dyno that has the Cobra making 312HP @ 6,000 rpm and still making 300HP at 6,400 rpm. After 6,500 the power falls off quicker and making power up to 7,000 rpm IS limiting and it should not be used for 7,000+ unless HEAVILY worked, but why when you can buy a better intake. They will make good power to 6,500 and I consider that the break point for a sanely ($$) modded intake.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 17, 2004
#54
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #54
Cool, thanks for the info Tom. I never would have guessed that, guess I sold the cobra shorter than I should have...
 
F

Fast94Cobra

New Member
Jan 1, 2003
385
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Mar 18, 2004
#55
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #55
how many people are making 300 rwhp NA on 94-95s? i know its not too hard on fox bodied cars but i have yet to see many of our cars do it...
 

randomjoker

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
427
0
0
Oklahoma
Mar 18, 2004
#56
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #56
Fast94Cobra said:
how many people are making 300 rwhp NA on 94-95s? i know its not too hard on fox bodied cars but i have yet to see many of our cars do it...
Click to expand...

lots of people close but few break the 300marker

look at peoples combos etc in the faq thread found here.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Mar 18, 2004
#57
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #57
Fast94Cobra said:
how many people are making 300 rwhp NA on 94-95s? i know its not too hard on fox bodied cars but i have yet to see many of our cars do it...
Click to expand...
randomjoker said:
lots of people close but few break the 300marker
look at peoples combos etc in the faq thread found here.
Click to expand...

That's what I try to tell people here and they get mad at me.. Im just stating facts based on observations. I cant explain WHY..

Now change our 302 block for a 306 or higher and youre there in a heartbeat with the h/c/i

RC
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Mar 18, 2004
#58
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #58
I'm pretty sure I'll break the 300 rwhp barrier with a proper cam to match my setup.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 18, 2004
#59
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #59
I'm not there... 293rwhp for me, I'm not complaining because I love smoking guys that have eclipsed that magical 300rwhp mark!!! Its not about the peak, lets not forget that.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Mar 18, 2004
#60
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #60
Killercanary said:
I'm not there... 293rwhp for me, I'm not complaining because I love smoking guys that have eclipsed that magical 300rwhp mark!!! Its not about the peak, lets not forget that.
Click to expand...
WERD!!

That 12.31 will smoke me, and Im running a Vortech at 10-11 lbs.
Of course, We'll never know for sure till I get to the track!
RC
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
400
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?