• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

3.31 vs 3.55 axle ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter radtexas
  • Start date Start date Jul 25, 2006

radtexas

New Member
Jul 25, 2006
79
0
0
Tyler, Texas
Jul 25, 2006
#1
  • Jul 25, 2006
  • #1
Just ordered myself a 2007 GT/CS Convertible. I got it with the optional 3.55 rear end ratio over the 3.31. I have been trying to find how much more acceleration I can expect from this change. Any knowledgeable folks out there that can enlighten me on this. All it says on the Ford sight is that it adds quicker acceleration. I ordered yesterday and hope to get it in 6-8 weeks.
 
0

06BLR85

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
38
0
0
Jul 25, 2006
#2
  • Jul 25, 2006
  • #2
Well i dont know exactly but it is a limited slip diff and from what i know about lsd it prevents one wheel from doing something the other isnt doing. So both wheels move at the same speed which i imagine it keeps the car straight and ture which would imptove take off.

Just my theory
 

93GrunT

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2000
342
0
0
NC
Jul 25, 2006
#3
  • Jul 25, 2006
  • #3
I am pretty sure all the GT's have the limited slip or atleast they have in the past regardless of the gears. 3.31 to 3.55 will probably be minimal difference, but I got them as an option also.
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
Jul 25, 2006
#4
  • Jul 25, 2006
  • #4
The 3.55 is standard on the GT manual transmissions and the 3.31 is optional on the automatics. But the Limited slip is Standard on the GT's.
 

93GrunT

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2000
342
0
0
NC
Jul 25, 2006
#5
  • Jul 25, 2006
  • #5
3.55 is standard on man. in canada I believe, it's an $100 option on manuals in the U.S. for 2007 and 3.31's are standard on 2007's.
 

vicmeldrew

New Member
May 29, 2005
14
0
1
Jul 26, 2006
#6
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • #6
The Fang said:
The 3.55 is standard on the GT manual transmissions and the 3.31 is optional on the automatics. But the Limited slip is Standard on the GT's.
Click to expand...

for 2007 the 3:31 is standard on the GT; if you want 3:55 it has to be ordered and is a separate item on the window sticker; prior to 07 it was standard. like he said above; sorry missed that post because of an advert stuck in the middle
 

radtexas

New Member
Jul 25, 2006
79
0
0
Tyler, Texas
Jul 26, 2006
#7
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • #7
So generally there will be no big difference in performance other than the CS package having the power pack included. I did not know that the prior models came standard with 3.55 ratio. I guess they are trying to let people have the option of better gas mileage? BUT who cares about gas mileage with your foot to the floor.
 

93GrunT

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2000
342
0
0
NC
Jul 26, 2006
#8
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • #8
vicmeldrew said:
for 2007 the 3:31 is standard on the GT; if you want 3:55 it has to be ordered and is a separate item on the window sticker; prior to 07 it was standard. like he said above; sorry missed that post because of an advert stuck in the middle
Click to expand...

What he said.

About there being no difference, I wouldn't say that you might notice a tenth faster or a little more SoP feeling when accelerating. When I had 3.08's in my 93 and went to 3.55's it was a noticable difference. That being said unless I needed a small difference in gears for running slicks or I took my drag racing very seriously I wouldn't waste my money stepping up one gear range. I got the 3.55 option b/c it only cost me $100 to start with instead of switching to 3.73's later and paying 5-600 dollars. I can live with 3.55's but I might have been tempted to go steeper if I had 3.31's. I am not sure that made any sense when I typed it but I thought I had it figured out in my head.
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
Jul 26, 2006
#9
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • #9
vicmeldrew said:
for 2007 the 3:31 is standard on the GT; if you want 3:55 it has to be ordered and is a separate item on the window sticker; prior to 07 it was standard. like he said above; sorry missed that post because of an advert stuck in the middle
Click to expand...

Sorry, I was qouting exactly from the 06 brochure.
 
B

boss377

New Member
Nov 17, 2004
23
0
0
Annandale, Virginia
Jul 26, 2006
#10
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • #10
I counted about six posts and not one telling you not to waste your money on the 3.55 gears. You should be changing to Ford Racing 4.10s ASAP, so why would you bother with this option. There are 12,001 posts online telling the benefits of the 4.10s. Call your salesman and delete the 3.55s. NO JOKE!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 30, 2006
#11
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #11
So why the heck are they doing that? Is it upping their overal fuel milage and making Ford look better? 3.55s are not too steep at all, I say 3.73s should be standard, and now they are drpping it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
L
Engine Normal Leakdown Results (unstarted in nearly 2 years)
  • Lube
  • May 26, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2024
Blackhawkxx
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Progress Thread Akumu No Dara Ra's LSX swap and build Thread! Updated (2/10/22 @ 8:30PM CST)
  • Akumu No Dara Ra
  • Feb 4, 2022
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
140
Views
16K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2022
Akumu No Dara Ra
Need help with choosing a good rear axle ratio
  • Willybill32
  • Mar 10, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2020
Neuron
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?