• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

302 H.o. Efi Valve Adjustment W/1.6 Rockers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DM87GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 26, 2014

DM87GT

Member
Jun 17, 2014
36
0
6
Jun 26, 2014
#1
  • Jun 26, 2014
  • #1
Hello, Can anyone tell me if there is a valve adjustment on GT40P heads I recently installed on my 302? My 302 is a H.O. engine with fuel injection. I was told there is no valve adjustment because my heads are the pedestal mount type. Was told to torque the nut on the 1.6 rocker arm down to 23-25 ft. lbs. Nothing else is needed. I was told that the roller lifter has to be seated on the flat spot on the cam, then torque the rocker arm nut to it's required torque. Is this information correct or what is the proper method to do the above mentioned? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you
 

fords2live

Member
Apr 12, 2013
84
4
9
Jul 6, 2014
#2
  • Jul 6, 2014
  • #2
Doesn't matter about being on the flat side of the cam. If they're pedestal mount, there is no possible adjustment. Crank em to 25 ft/lbs and that's it.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 6, 2014
#3
  • Jul 6, 2014
  • #3
Read this....

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-for...er-stud-pedestal-mount-roller-rockers.872072/
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jul 6, 2014
#4
  • Jul 6, 2014
  • #4
fords2live said:
Doesn't matter about being on the flat side of the cam. If they're pedestal mount, there is no possible adjustment. Crank em to 25 ft/lbs and that's it.
Click to expand...

Ouch, some bad advise there. Yes pedestal mounts need to be adjusted properly. The main difference bewtween them and stud mount is they use shims to achieve proper preload, swipe and height. Follow the rocker manufacturer's installation instructions for preload and torque.

For example, here is Crane's installation

http://www.cranecams.com/uploads/instructions/453e_.pdf
 

fords2live

Member
Apr 12, 2013
84
4
9
Jul 6, 2014
#5
  • Jul 6, 2014
  • #5
He's swapping to gt40s, not building 3000 horse drag motor. Might as well stick a plate in the lifter valley, put 4 bolt mains in it, main girdle and fill it with cement. Crank em to 25 ft/lbs. Done it with several cam and head swaps. Including exactly what your doing. Especially when you probably won't even see 6200, which is only 3600 for the valve train. I twisted my set up to 7000. On a full rebuild in my garage. People tend to over kill with small horse engine builds.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 6, 2014
#6
  • Jul 6, 2014
  • #6
fords2live said:
He's swapping to gt40s, not building 3000 horse drag motor. Might as well stick a plate in the lifter valley, put 4 bolt mains in it, main girdle and fill it with cement. Crank em to 25 ft/lbs. Done it with several cam and head swaps. Including exactly what your doing. Especially when you probably won't even see 6200, which is only 3600 for the valve train. I twisted my set up to 7000. On a full rebuild in my garage. People tend to over kill with small horse engine builds.
Click to expand...

With that mind set. Why even bother to torque the heads, or install all of the intake bolts? I mean....it's just a junk 302, right? You don't need to build a 3,000-horsepower race engine in order to use your head! He's not talking about factory stamped steel rockers here. You can't just randomly crank down a set of aftermarket roller rockers and call it a day....you gotta measure. All heads, rockers, pushrods and gaskets are not created equal. Throw a little wear in there, a new valve job, or a decking for trueness and you could see as much as .060-.080 between valve heights.

Throw them on without measuring and you could end up with the roller tip out of the centreline of the valve....causing excessive valvetrain wear and movement.

Worse still...you may end up with ether too much, or not enough lifter pleload. That'll leave ya with valve train noise, missing RPM, lost horsepower, or in worst case a bent pushrods, or piston to valve contact.

Don't just crank em down....measure them up and use the shims if need be!!! Go out and buy a $10 set of feeler gauges and put them to work. Don't be "that guy".
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby and mikestang63

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jul 7, 2014
#7
  • Jul 7, 2014
  • #7
Michael Yount’s valve adjustment procedure

Here's an easy way to determine this. Start with the #1 cylinder. Rotate the engine with a ratchet on the crank bolt clockwise. Watch the #1 pushrods. First the exhaust pushrod will rise and fall signaling what would be the exhaust valve opening and closing if the rocker were on. As it closes the intake pushrod will rise -- keep rotating clockwise until the intake pushrod falls and is level with the exhaust pushrod - both at the same height. Both lifters are now on the base circle of the cam - both valves would be closed if the rockers were on.

Now, install both rockers. Tighten the bolts with one hand while rocking the rocker with the other hand - continue until you reach the point where you can't 'rock' the rocker any more because there's no gap on the valve stem end or the pushrod end. You are at zero lash - i.e. - no gaps. Stop tightening just as you reach this point.

Now, put your torque wrench on the bolt and tighten it to 18-20 ft-lbs while counting the number of turns it takes to reach the torque. You should hit the torque within 1/4 to 1 turn of the bolt. If it takes more than 1 turn, use a shim to raise the rocker -- each .030" shim will reduce the number of turns to torque by about 1/4 turn. If you reach the torque in less than a 1/4 turn, or you have trouble reaching zero lash even at full torque, then you'll either need longer pushrods, or to CAREFULLY remove some material from the bottom of the rocker fulcrum. Using the procedure described above, you will work through the remaining 7 pairs of rockers. If you follow the firing order, it will minimize the manual cranking you have to do to get the lifters on the base circle of the cam prior to installation of the next pair.

When I first went through mine, 13 of them took no shims; 3 of them took 1 .030" shim. Upon cranking it up, one or two of them sounded a bit noisier than I thought was right, so with the engine hot, I pulled the upper off, and the valve covers, and went through the installation procedure again. That time, 11 of them took no shims; 4 of them took one .030", and one of them took one .060" shim. And they were very quiet running.

Good luck with it.
__________________
Michael Yount - K'ville,TN 82 Volvo 242w/5.0L; 2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

fords2live

Member
Apr 12, 2013
84
4
9
Jul 12, 2014
#8
  • Jul 12, 2014
  • #8
Nobody said they were adjustable. He asked if there IS adjustment. And zero lash on preload, solid or hydraulic. Almost any cam manufacturer will tell you that.
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Jul 13, 2014
#9
  • Jul 13, 2014
  • #9
fords2live said:
Nobody said they were adjustable. He asked if there IS adjustment. And zero lash on preload, solid or hydraulic. Almost any cam manufacturer will tell you that.
Click to expand...
What What? There IS preload on a hydraulic. And there IS lash on a solid.
 

fords2live

Member
Apr 12, 2013
84
4
9
Jul 15, 2014
#10
  • Jul 15, 2014
  • #10
I understand that. But on hydraulic especially; Crower and Howards Cams both say just take it to zero lash and tighten down the poly lock. On hydraulic, you want the plunger to bleed all the way out. Which gives more accurate valve events with high rpms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
934
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?