• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 or a 347 for daily driving?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tx2000gt
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2005
T

tx2000gt

New Member
May 27, 2005
222
0
0
Oct 15, 2005
#1
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #1
My buddies stock 5.0 is getting close to hitting the 250k mark, and he wants to swap it out and build up a short block. I told him a 331 would suit him better for daily driving, but he still wants a 347. I told him that the 347 consumes oil faster than normal and the engine in whole wears out quicker. Any other thoughts?
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Oct 15, 2005
#2
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #2
tx2000gt said:
My buddies stock 5.0 is getting close to hitting the 250k mark, and he wants to swap it out and build up a short block. I told him a 331 would suit him better for daily driving, but he still wants a 347. I told him that the 347 consumes oil faster than normal and the engine in whole wears out quicker. Any other thoughts?
Click to expand...

What is the rest of his combination of parts: heads, cam, intake, etc

I prefer a 331 myself, but the 347 from certain companies are good.
If I was going to build a 347 for daily use, this is what I would buy:

- A DSS level 20 5.0 bare block (with chamfered bores on the deck to unshroud larger valves) and their aluminum girdle.
- A CHP 347 stroker kit with flat tops and the 5.315" rods.
- AFR185's 58cc heads with the spring upgrade
- Edelbrock RPMII or Holley intake
- A custom grind dual pattern cam matched for the combo
- 1-5/8" headers to 2-1/2" exhaust
- Definitely lower gears (3.55's or 3.73's)
etc
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 15, 2005
#3
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #3
CoupedUp - We think too much alike
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
Oct 15, 2005
#4
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #4
I would go with a 347 from CHP. The oil comsumption problem has long been fixed, and if you get the correct rod ratio you don't have to worry about engine life.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 15, 2005
#5
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #5
Physics can't be solved though. It is and always will be in existence. The steeper rod ratio causes more sideloading and ring wear over time.
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Oct 15, 2005
#6
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #6
CoupedUp said:
What is the rest of his combination of parts: heads, cam, intake, etc

I prefer a 331 myself, but the 347 from certain companies are good.
If I was going to build a 347 for daily use, this is what I would buy:

- A DSS level 20 5.0 bare block (with chamfered bores on the deck to unshroud larger valves) and their aluminum girdle.
- A CHP 347 stroker kit with flat tops and the 5.315" rods.
- AFR185's 58cc heads with the spring upgrade
- Edelbrock RPMII or Holley intake
- A custom grind dual pattern cam matched for the combo
- 1-5/8" headers to 2-1/2" exhaust
- Definitely lower gears (3.55's or 3.73's)
etc
Click to expand...
a comp cams XE274HR would be a good aplication for that engine
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 15, 2005
#7
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #7
aleborjas - A custom cam would be better
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Oct 15, 2005
#8
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #8
I had been debating this for a long time before deciding to build a 347. The oil problems have been fixed and IMO the potential ring problem shouldn't be a problem on a DD that sees average rpms in the 3000 range.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 15, 2005
#9
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #9
You can't go against physics. The oil problems have progressed greatly but the 347 does wear out quicker. They both can last a very long time if maintained properly. The 331 is less resistent to the rings and sidewall of the block.
 
8

87AODGT

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2001
373
1
19
Toms River, NJ
Oct 15, 2005
#10
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #10
don't any of these companies sell pistons with offset wrist pins? I would think that would help with longevity and oil consumption
 
T

tx2000gt

New Member
May 27, 2005
222
0
0
Oct 15, 2005
#11
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #11
I know that CHP does something with the wrist pins that makes them stronger. But, what do you think I should tell him? He wants to make good power, take it to the track a few times a year, and have it as a daily driver. But judging from what yall've said, it seems most of the problems that plagued the 347 before, have since been corrected. Either way, he said he's buying from CHP since they're the cheapest and, from what I've read, the best for the money.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Oct 15, 2005
#12
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #12
tx2000 - built with quality components, machined by a competent shop and assembled with care -- either a 331 or a 347 will hold up just fine for daily driving for his next 200k miles -- assuming he's not terribly abusive. Tell your buddy to toss a coin and take his pick.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Oct 15, 2005
#13
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #13
True there is added stress on a 347 but, the longevity difference between the 2 is minumum. Just like Yount said, with quality parts and a competent machine shop and bulider...flip a coin. I have a pal thats got over 70,000 on his dd 347. I have a 347 dd and I have no problems at all. I am not promoting a 347 over the 331, I just don't personally know anyone with that engine. You will be happy with either one...guaranteed
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Oct 15, 2005
#14
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #14
5spd GT said:
CoupedUp - We think too much alike
Click to expand...

Scary isn't it
 

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Oct 16, 2005
#15
  • Oct 16, 2005
  • #15
i personally like the 347.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Oct 16, 2005
#16
  • Oct 16, 2005
  • #16
Use the FMS hypertectic 347, costs about $2200 and is built with the sportsman block.

Has the hyper pistons which don't expand and contract so they don't destroy the cylinder walls as fast as a forged piston.

And someone will post here and say they are not that strong. But realistically if you boost any 347 that isn't made from an A4, r302, or dart, you are going to far exceed the blocks strenght anyway. So likely you'll break the block before the rotating assembly anyhow.

I happen to have the forged version of the Sportsman block 347 ready to go. But the reason i'm using the forged version is that if i decide i want one of the above mentioned blocks, i can re-use the rotating assembly. Which BTW is $2000 alone.

Oh, and no waiting, you can pick these up at motorsport dealers with a warranty.

The Chp shortblocks are also very repudable.
But i'm also pretty sure that CHP (which is also Probe) builds the 331, 342, 347's for ford, just with different tolerances and some different parts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
612
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
540
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
666
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?