• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 stroker time!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter chobracobra
  • Start date Start date Sep 24, 2005

chobracobra

New Member
Jun 29, 2004
175
0
0
jersey shore
Sep 24, 2005
#1
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #1
hey guys...well the aod is out and the tremec is in. whewww what a job! anyway next project on the neverending list is a rebuild for my tired little 302. I figure...if your gonna open up a block and replace parts GO BIG OR GO HOME! i'm gonna go for a 331 stroker kit and have it worked at La'Roccas in Englishtown. Anyone know a nice reliable kit that wont break my wallet and anything else i should consider? i am plannning on spending 800-1200 bucks on the kit. Thanks all!!!
PS. in a previous thread i asked if it is safe to dyno test a brand new engine. after they build it i want it dynod and tuned and was wondering if i should wait to break it in and bring it back, or just do it when its done. thanks again
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 24, 2005
#2
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #2
i did my 331 for 1700....that included all the machine work for the block.....the stroker kit from performance automotive warhouse with forged probe pistons, forged eagle rods and scat crank was 1300$ that included bearings and rings
 

Killer50stang

New Member
May 11, 2004
632
0
0
Sep 24, 2005
#3
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #3
Why not go 347?
 

stock 92 gt

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
165
0
0
Sep 24, 2005
#4
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #4
well if he wants boost in the future, a 331 seems like it is a better platform for boost.
 

chobracobra

New Member
Jun 29, 2004
175
0
0
jersey shore
Sep 24, 2005
#5
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #5
347? ehhh i thought about it. i like the 331 number. however i might add i heard a lot about 347's runnin longer than a 331, is this true? she is a daily driver so i want the best for her. a 347 is not out of the question. also anyone got numbers on how much something like this might cost to get done, not parts just work. thanks
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 24, 2005
#6
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #6
Killer50stang said:
Why not go 347?
Click to expand...
they are VERY close in power output its pretty much personal preference, plus the wrist pin doesnt intersect the ringlands on a 331
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 24, 2005
#7
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #7
Modular2v said:
they are VERY close in power output its pretty much personal preference, plus the wrist pin doesnt intersect the ringlands on a 331
Click to expand...

The probe 347 kits using their 5.315" rods and a probe 331 piston do not intersect fyi. Its a 331 piston and they designed a 5.315" rod to make it work for a 3.40 stroke.

347 owner here, wouldn't use anything else. Unless it was a dart block, then it'd be a 360"
 

Killer50stang

New Member
May 11, 2004
632
0
0
Sep 24, 2005
#8
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #8
Grn92LX said:
The probe 347 kits using their 5.315" rods and a probe 331 piston do not intersect fyi. Its a 331 piston and they designed a 5.315" rod to make it work for a 3.40 stroke.

347 owner here, wouldn't use anything else. Unless it was a dart block, then it'd be a 360"
Click to expand...

Not sure about boost being better on a 331, I've seen many blower, and even turbo setups on 347's lasting a long time...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 24, 2005
#9
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #9
A 331 is better for boost. That doesn't mean you can't run a 347 with boost. Less sidewall pressure with the 331.

I say go 331...power numbers are similar.

Good Luck!
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Sep 24, 2005
#10
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #10
I love my 331. I did it in part because i was/will use nitrous. I love the way it performs.

and dont listen to Mike, he is biast on bigger parts
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 24, 2005
#11
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #11
N8Miller said:
and dont listen to Mike, he is biast on bigger parts
Click to expand...

Thats what Jess told me
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Sep 24, 2005
#12
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
Thats what Jess told me
Click to expand...

sure, ya had to go there....
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Sep 24, 2005
#13
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #13
5spd GT said:
A 331 is better for boost. That doesn't mean you can't run a 347 with boost. Less sidewall pressure with the 331.

I say go 331...power numbers are similar.

Good Luck!
Click to expand...
Exactly my knowledge on the topic. A 331 has a better rod ratio which translates into less side thrust forces (think of a long rod buildup).
 

chobracobra

New Member
Jun 29, 2004
175
0
0
jersey shore
Sep 24, 2005
#14
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #14
thanks for the input. I think im going to stick to the 331, maybe boost will be a option down the road, i do have the e-cam. I think i will go with the DSS racing 331 stroker assembly. There are a few options and im not sure which would suit my application. check it out, dssracing.com thanks
 

Killer50stang

New Member
May 11, 2004
632
0
0
Sep 24, 2005
#15
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #15
the 347 has always been a favorite of mine but I have a carb. blower setup. Can't I survive on a 347?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
supercharging my v6 4.0
  • dreamerv6stang
  • Jan 12, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
911
The Welcome Wagon Jul 21, 2025
tovlux6
T
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Recommended 347 stroker kits?
  • bigbros93
  • Jan 2, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2022
96pushrod
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?