• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351 choices

  • Thread starter Thread starter carterjs
  • Start date Start date Nov 19, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
C

carterjs

New Member
Sep 3, 2006
2
0
0
Culleoka, TN
Nov 19, 2006
#1
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #1
I posted a question a few months back about a 68 coupe w/ a 200 in it well about a week ago the motor gave out so now i'm faced w/ what to put in it and after talking w/ a few people they said either a 351 Windsor or a 351 Cleveland honestly I don't know which one would be more suitable for the car but I need descant horsepower that can be driven regularly
 
3

351w_swap

New Member
May 23, 2004
263
0
0
Nov 19, 2006
#2
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #2
Get a windsor. Parts are much more easy to come by, plus you could stroke it to 408, put on some aluminum heads intake and aftermarket carb with a built cam to get good power. It is a small block and the cleveland is a big block so I assume that the c is heavier than the w. Maybe I am a little partial though.
 
N

Nemesis67

New Member
Jul 3, 2006
146
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 19, 2006
#3
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #3
You could do either. But I would prefer the 351W, which is what I am planning on using in my 67 Fastback. The Windsor has a better aftermarket and is more plentiful than the Cleveland. If you decide to use the Cleveland, try to find a 2V versus a 4V. The 2V has smaller intake ports in the heads which is good for street use. But if you plan on using aftermarket heads, which are harder to find for the Cleveland, then it wouldn't matter. But as I said before, the Windsor is quite plentiful, I believe they are available from 1969 to 1996 and have a lot more aftermarket parts available. The blocks from 94 to 96 are true roller blocks while the earlier are not. I plan on using a roller block in my car. But they are not easy to find and if the seller knows what they have they won't sell it cheaply. Good luck in your search!
 
N

Nemesis67

New Member
Jul 3, 2006
146
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 19, 2006
#4
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #4
351w_swap said:
Get a windsor. Parts are much more easy to come by, plus you could stroke it to 408, put on some aluminum heads intake and aftermarket carb with a built cam to get good power. It is a small block and the cleveland is a big block so I assume that the c is heavier than the w. Maybe I am a little partial though.
Click to expand...


351W Swap... The 351C is still a small block, but it is slightly heavier than the 351W. The heads on the Cleveland are what made it so popular in the earlier years. As well as the main journal size on the crank. But the Windsor is now the favored motor.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 19, 2006
#5
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #5
The Cleveland was never considered a big block. It uses the same bell housings and motor mount bolt pattern as the Windsor. It DID make big block power in a small block package. If you want something different and can find a good core or complete running engine, the Cleveland is definately a head turner. Back in the 70's to mid 80's, it was the engine the Chevy guys hated to run up against on a dark night. If you are close to south louisiana, I've got a good core.
 
3

351w_swap

New Member
May 23, 2004
263
0
0
Nov 19, 2006
#6
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #6
alright, i guess im wrong. I was under the impression that the cleveland was a big block because i was told that i couldnt use it in my 65. I still prefer the windsor though.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 19, 2006
#7
  • Nov 19, 2006
  • #7
Whoever told you the Clevland wouldn't fit your 65 was wrong there too. It's a tight fit, but it's been done. The Windsor and Clevelands are both small blocks, the 352 and the 351M would be big blocks, even though they share the same bore/stroke as the others and the 351m shares many parts with the Cleveland.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Nov 20, 2006
#8
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #8
Nemesis67 said:
You could do either. But I would prefer the 351W, which is what I am planning on using in my 67 Fastback. The Windsor has a better aftermarket and is more plentiful than the Cleveland. If you decide to use the Cleveland, try to find a 2V versus a 4V. The 2V has smaller intake ports in the heads which is good for street use. But if you plan on using aftermarket heads, which are harder to find for the Cleveland, then it wouldn't matter. But as I said before, the Windsor is quite plentiful, I believe they are available from 1969 to 1996 and have a lot more aftermarket parts available. The blocks from 94 to 96 are true roller blocks while the earlier are not. I plan on using a roller block in my car. But they are not easy to find and if the seller knows what they have they won't sell it cheaply. Good luck in your search!
Click to expand...

To rebut a couple of misconceptions:
1. 2V heads, which are all open chamber, are not optimal for street use because they are prone to knocking, especially with todays gas. If you go with a cleveland you want to get the 4V closed chambers heads.
2. There quite a few aftermarket heads for the cleveland. Edelbrock, CHI, and AFR to name a few manufacturers. Don't forget that NASCAR still uses cleveland based heads so if you have the bucks you can get Ford Motorsport and Yates heads too.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Nov 20, 2006
#9
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #9
If you go Cleveland maybe you could get some of them down under heads. Those Australian heads are supposed to be better than the American heads but they may be hard to come by.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 20, 2006
#10
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #10
danny clemens said:
If you go Cleveland maybe you could get some of them down under heads. Those Australian heads are supposed to be better than the American heads but they may be hard to come by.
Click to expand...


the aussie heads are the way to go for a mild street motor. the have the better closed chambers and smaller 2v intake and exhaust ports so you don't have to rev the motor too high to make the power. 4v heads can be a bit edgy on the street with a stock displacement engine, now if you go stroker the 4v heads are good since you have a lot more cubes to feed.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Nov 20, 2006
#11
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #11
bnickel said:
the aussie heads are the way to go for a mild street motor. the have the better closed chambers and smaller 2v intake and exhaust ports so you don't have to rev the motor too high to make the power. 4v heads can be a bit edgy on the street with a stock displacement engine, now if you go stroker the 4v heads are good since you have a lot more cubes to feed.
Click to expand...

That's the truth. When I rebuild my cleveland it's going to be a 408.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 20, 2006
#12
  • Nov 20, 2006
  • #12
pushrod power said:
That's the truth. When I rebuild my cleveland it's going to be a 408.
Click to expand...


there are a bunch of different motors i would like to build just to swap into the car whenever my mood changes. a long rod, roller block 351w, next would be a boss 302 clone with a late model 5.0 roller block and aussie heads and finally a 408C with some closed chamber 4v heads. that's not something i see happening any time soon probably not even in my lifetime so the engine i'm planning right now is the long rod roller windsor. that will be the most likely power plant for my next project car.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Nov 21, 2006
#13
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #13
Another vote for a 351W (stroked or not).

Although the 351C was the Ford small block motor to have in the 80's (I wanted one for my '67), the 351W is more economical today. The availability of parts and people using them makes it more feasible.

I think the Cleveland motor is one of Fords best looking motors, and I would not mind having one today.
 
D

dablack

New Member
May 17, 2005
39
0
0
Nov 21, 2006
#14
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #14
Just another note:

There is no such thing as a small block or big block ford. That nomiclature came out of the cheby camp. They only really had two motors the small block (283ish 327 350) and the big block (383 ish 427 454).

With Fords there are many more motors and they defy simple clasification. I'm not going to go back to the 50s so you have the FE motors (352, 390, 427, 428), the clevelands (351), the windsors (260, 289, 302, 351), the limas (429, 460) and the M (351, 400). Just call it what it is.

I think you should go w/ a 351W
 
M

mo'factor

Member
Jul 29, 2006
58
0
6
Nov 21, 2006
#15
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #15
351

I have a 351 Windsor in my '68. It is a close fit when changing plugs on the drivers side. I've heard that the cleveland is worse. As far as heads go you can run cleveland heads on a windsor, but they require a lot of modification. Headers are easier to find for the windsor. I am running headman shorties and they work well. Don't forget to get a bigger radiator either way because the six cylinder radiator is too small. I am running the 24" 3 row 390 radiator.
 

70dvr

New Member
Jul 25, 2006
46
0
0
Brandon, Florida
Nov 21, 2006
#16
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #16
I'm very happy with my 393W. If I were building one today it would be a
408W with a roller cam.
 
B

BB1966

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
297
1
0
Beaufort , NC USA!!!!
Nov 21, 2006
#17
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #17
Actually Chevys were small blocks from 265 - 400. Big blocks were from 396 - 454...not counting the current 572 or the 502 crate engines.
 

fvike

Member
Aug 24, 2004
335
0
16
Mosjøen, Norway
Nov 21, 2006
#18
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #18
Go for the Windsor. A friend of mine once had a '68 with cleveland, and changeing the sparkplugs was a weekend job!
If you want the Cleveland heads, Edelbrock's 351 Cleveland heads actually fits Windsors too, IIRC.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 21, 2006
#19
  • Nov 21, 2006
  • #19
dablack said:
Just another note:

There is no such thing as a small block or big block ford........I'm not going to go back to the 50s so you have the FE motors.......
Click to expand...

The 332 FE was an option in the late '50s. The other engine option was either a 223 I-6 or a 272/292/312 Y-block.

For someone just getting up to speed, I would recommend a 351W. It shares a lot with the 289s and 302s, so the knowledge base is larger. I'd love to have a Cleveland, but I suspect the learning curve is steeper for anyone unfamiliar with them.

bnickel said:
the engine i'm planning right now is the long rod roller windsor.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, why a long rod?
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Nov 22, 2006
#20
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #20
Ford also had a 221 V8 that came out in 1962. I had one that was in a 62 Fairlane and it was pretty weak. It's also in the windsor family.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
805
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Today at 3:18 PM
2000xp8
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
524
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 3, 2026
squeak93
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
974
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
281
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
H
Hello all from my shop, Tod/ Tods Hot Rods, located in Moorpark CA 93021. Longtime 25 Yr Restoration/Performance Shop and Custom Builder Owner. Tod
  • Hot Rod Tod
  • May 28, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon May 28, 2024
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?