• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

393 stroker CR help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 351vic
  • Start date Start date Jan 25, 2008
3

351vic

New Member
Jun 13, 2007
33
0
0
Pierz, MN
Jan 25, 2008
#1
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #1
Hey guys, I'm putting together a 393 stroker, I have the bottom end already but the guy i got it from said it would be 10.5 CR and I just ran all the numbers on the compression ratio calculator and I came up with 11.3:1! So therein lies my dilemma.... Is that WAY too much compression for the street with aluminum heads or will I be okay? Thanks
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 25, 2008
#2
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #2
11.3:1 is a little high for the street even with aluminum heads. combustion chamber volume is the best place to adjust compression if you haven't already bought the heads. i'm assuming the heads have either 58 or 60cc chambers and if you went with a 64cc head instead you'd probably be closer to the 10.5 number. either that or run a really thick head gasket
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Jan 27, 2008
#3
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #3
Clevelands love compression, having said that, you also would not want too much for the street on pump gas. I had my extra engine rebuilt to match Boss 351 engine specs for my 71 Boss. The CR is 11.3:1 on iron heads, but I run on the street octane booster, 93 pump gas, and take it easy on the timing. NO problems whatsoever, so far .

Also, the cam grind you use can help you run on the street.
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Jan 27, 2008
#4
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #4
dup
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 28, 2008
#5
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #5
That is not that bad for alum. heads just run 91-93 octane fuel.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jan 28, 2008
#6
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #6
If you wouldn't mind, would you post the variables you used for CR?
 
3

351vic

New Member
Jun 13, 2007
33
0
0
Pierz, MN
Jan 28, 2008
#7
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #7
And by variables you mean........ What?
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Jan 28, 2008
#8
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #8
I think he want's to know what numbers you used to come up with the 11.3:1 compression.
 
3

351vic

New Member
Jun 13, 2007
33
0
0
Pierz, MN
Jan 28, 2008
#9
  • Jan 28, 2008
  • #9
60cc chambers, 8cc piston head volume, .040 gasket thickness, 4.060 bore, .0143 deck clearance, 3.85" stroke. Came to like 11.275:1 or something to be exact
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jan 29, 2008
#10
  • Jan 29, 2008
  • #10
I get 11.18 - my spreadsheet takes in one or two more variables, chiefly piston to wall volume. You can run this CR if you also choose a healthy cam to bleed off some dynamic compression. If I were you, because I am not a can expert, I would consult with a custom cam grinder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
571
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?