• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

408W Build. Am I forgetting Anything?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Venom351R
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 30, 2009
#21
  • Jul 30, 2009
  • #21
Venom351R said:
no
Click to expand...

One thing about them is you know the build quality is going to be excellent. Rick completely threw out a 351 block that many others would have used because it was not up to his standards.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jul 30, 2009
#22
  • Jul 30, 2009
  • #22
Yeah I like Rick, others on here have had great things to say about his engines and he's helped a lot as far as the combo on mine. Some of the engines he's build have put down some sick numbers from what he's been telling me

 

Attachments

  • 100_0331.webp
    100.9 KB · Views: 201

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 31, 2009
#23
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #23
Yep. The numbers depend on what you want. He can build them mild or totally nuts, whichever you prefer. I could get more out of mine but we are making it more streetable for my preferences (mild). There's a lot you can do with a 408 though! I mean, you have plenty of c.i. to work with. Rick has a lot of 1/4 mile track experience too.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Jul 31, 2009
#24
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #24
What's wrong with your Roush headers? If you decide to get rid of'em, let me know, although I'm guessing you're not in a rush to part with them this year
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jul 31, 2009
#25
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #25
xr8d302 said:
What's wrong with your Roush headers? If you decide to get rid of'em, let me know, although I'm guessing you're not in a rush to part with them this year
Click to expand...


They are shorty headers, not the best choice to go with when building an engine of this caliber. I dont plan on selling them they are pretty rare. The guy that sold me the car said that those headers were going for about $600.


Another reason I scraped the idea of the Turbo is anytime you pop the hood whether at the track, a parking lot, a car show and anyone sees a Turbo, supercharger or Nitrous lines they just expect it to be fast and to put out gobs of power. When you pop the hood and see nothing but engine and blow the doors off a boosted car at the track while ripping off a mid 11's run at 120 + it leaves them scratching their heads.

Its always nice to be able to say "its just a 302 w/ Heads and an Intake" who would know the difference until they were handing you over $20 after you schooled them. Point being there is no big surprise when it comes to boost, every expects it to be 500 HP and run 10's and while many do there are many that dont. But Ive always liked to go by the philosophy of do more with less, not that a stroked 351/408 is less its just the principle of NA VS Forced Induction
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Jul 31, 2009
#26
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • #26
Those headers are rare, that's why I jumped at it haha

Shame that they're shorties though, do they flow decently for what they are?
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Aug 1, 2009
#27
  • Aug 1, 2009
  • #27
they probably do but I dont really have anything to compare it to. My current combo pulled 333/338 w/ the shorty headers and cats. But Im going for a retune w/ a new mass air meter next weekend my DBX went bad on me and the new PMAS meter will be here on monday.
 
C

cody50

Member
Jan 31, 2004
29
0
7
I live in the frozen tundra of Bismarck ND
Aug 4, 2009
#28
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #28
yeah its easy to spend $900 on a used block and machining, so thats a good approach. It is a good idea to get your kit balanced to your flywheel and your balancer before putting it in though. Remember all that displacement will need a lot of air so dont be afraid of going even bigger than 205cc heads or a bigger cam. Also I don't know what fuel system you have, but I sure hope it doesn't have include stock anything. I used cheap MAC 1 3/4 longtubes and am happy with them so far on my 427. oh and the quickest way to destroy a windsor is by pushing all your oil into the valve covers with a high volume pump.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
910
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
894
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
374
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?