'57 9" rear, '68 notch, and tire appearance...

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
'57 9" rear, '68 notch, and tire fitment...

I just looked through eight pages of search results and didnt find an answer, so I'm asking now. I have the opportunity to trade my '68's 8 inch rear for a 9" out of a '57 Custom 300, but as many of you know the '57 rear is two inches shorter than my Mustang's. I was going to get 15x7 or 15x8 Torque Thrusts, but I want to use the same backspacing all around so I can rotate tires. What I'm worried about is the back wheels looking sucked into the fenderwells or actual fitment problems. Will I have any issues?
 
I just put a 57/59 rear in my 67.
I have 14x7’s all the way around. 215/60 Front and 265/50 in the rear. You do notice the difference at first because you are not use to it. It’s only 1” on each side, so it’s not that major. I did this knowing that I would eventually get new wheels and tires and be running larger wheels in the back.
The whole point was to be able to run a deeper dish wheel in the back. Maybe a 8” or 9” wheel in the back.

If you are set on running the same size tires then you and a trained eye will notice the difference.

Here is a pic of my car as it sits now.
 
It will look fine as long as you use the 15x7's in front and the 8's in the rear. :D Besides, unless you plan on this being your daily driver, you're not likely to put enough miles on it to need to worry about rotating the tires. :nice:
 
Pbum5 said:
Here is a pic of my car as it sits now.

Eh, nothing there.

BTW, this will be my daily driver, my only car in fact. Thats why I was concerned about rotating the tires. I'll consider using 8s in the back, but I was also going to get a set of 15x7 black steel circle track wheels for the time being. It will be cheaper to spend $150-200 on rims than to replace the set of 225/60/r15 tires I already have.