• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

65mm-70mm tb

  • Thread starter Thread starter mace6
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
M

mace6

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#1
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #1
What size TB should I use? Installing Tw heads, street intake and stage 1 cam on 94 GT vert. I've been told both 65 and 70.

jimmy
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Dec 12, 2004
#2
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #2
70 or even a 75 wouldnt hurt
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Dec 12, 2004
#3
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #3
Your street heat manifold is already setup to accept a 75mm TB... I would go with that. The extra size will not hurt you, and as you continue to build up your car will only enhance the affects of other mods.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Dec 12, 2004
#4
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #4
Which ever one you find the cheapest either one will work about the same.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 12, 2004
#5
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #5
75mm. Are you converting to fox style or keeping it sn95 style? Reason I ask is because if your going fox style use an accufab, but if your keeping it sn95 I dont know what brand to recommend since accufab doesn't make TB's for your years. I had an accufab 65mm then switch to an accufab 75mm.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Dec 12, 2004
#6
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #6
i would either go with a 70 or 75. your setup can take both and work well. i would go with a 75. it will allow you to grow with your setup.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 12, 2004
#7
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #7
.....



Joe
 
M

mace6

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#8
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #8
I'm going to stay with the sn95 for now so I guess the 75mm is my best bet., also, will i need a custom chip? one person told me that on 94-95's that the cam would lower the vaccume pressure and that my computer would have issues with that. thanks for the help!!!!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 12, 2004
#9
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #9
Go no bigger than 70mm with that setup...

Good Luck with it...
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 12, 2004
#10
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #10
Joes95GT said:
.....



Joe
Click to expand...

Good answer , Joe I know you wanna say it too, but you know whats gonna happen....
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Dec 12, 2004
#11
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #11
IMO 75mm is too big. Bigger is not always better. Remmember that what your after here is velocity. 70mm is as big as you will ever need on the street. I've seen several tests done at the dyno shop where 65 was swapped for a 70mm and there was literally no difference in performance, so in this instance get the whichever one you get the best deal on.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 12, 2004
#12
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #12
greenlantern said:
Bigger is not always better. Remmember that what your after here is velocity.
Click to expand...
Is it now?

This is fuel injection. Not carburation. Velocity is "made" in the runners of the manifold, not the throttle body.
mace6 said:
I'm going to stay with the sn95 for now so I guess the 75mm is my best bet., also, will i need a custom chip? one person told me that on 94-95's that the cam would lower the vaccume pressure and that my computer would have issues with that. thanks for the help!!!!
Click to expand...
With most camshafts, you will lose an inch or so of vacuum at idle. No big deal. My car lost about 2 inches at idle, and it still runs fine. Unless you are putting a Pro-stock-like cam in the car, you'll be fine and vacuum loss will not be an issue.

Joe
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 12, 2004
#13
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #13
greenlantern said:
IMO 75mm is too big. Bigger is not always better.
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly...

A TB can almost be used as a tool for velocity...and what if the runners are to "big"...what velocity is made then...many different factors come into play...not one specific part...

A 75mm would be more ideal for a stroked or blown car...

By swapping just TB's on a h/c/i engine...you would lose some torque (low rpm throttle response) on the lower end of the rpm spectrum...at WOT...

65 or 70mm would be fine for YOUR application...
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Dec 12, 2004
#14
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #14
I have the same intake you have and I am going with a 75mm throttlebody.
 

ARed1995GT

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
401
0
0
Boca Raton, FL
Dec 12, 2004
#15
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #15
Grn92LX said:
75mm. Are you converting to fox style or keeping it sn95 style? Reason I ask is because if your going fox style use an accufab, but if your keeping it sn95 I dont know what brand to recommend since accufab doesn't make TB's for your years. I had an accufab 65mm then switch to an accufab 75mm.
Click to expand...
everytime i see a throttle body thread i check it and see what u have to say haha, whether its on here or corral.. ur always repping that 75mm tb, what would u suggest for my car?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 12, 2004
#16
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #16
Lets think about this a little bit...

I contend that velocity is created in the runners of the (long) runner intake manifold. Others contend that throttle bodies regulate velocity. If that was the case, then could you use a 60mm TB on a Vic. Jr. intake manifold on stock heads and it would run OK because the TB is creating the velocity?

Joe
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 12, 2004
#17
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #17
ARed1995GT said:
everytime i see a throttle body thread i check it and see what u have to say haha, whether its on here or corral.. ur always repping that 75mm tb, what would u suggest for my car?
Click to expand...


70mm if you really wanted to change it. I'd save up for some heads/cam and do it all at once personally.

Go get 'em Joe. I'm glad I have other smart guys backing me up on this topic
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 12, 2004
#18
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #18
Joes95GT said:
Lets think about this a little bit...

I contend that velocity is created in the runners of the (long) runner intake manifold. Others contend that throttle bodies regulate velocity. If that was the case, then could you use a 60mm TB on a Vic. Jr. intake manifold on stock heads and it would run OK because the TB is creating the velocity?

Joe
Click to expand...

I was referring to HIS application...not a bottleneck (stock)...which actually flows fairly decently for stock...You can give or take the "velocity" theory...you just can't be GENERAL with a TB statement...

I never said the TB is the only way to regulate velocity...it is one of many engine components you can use...

And to the original poster...make sure you have a nice flowing MAF/calibrated for you injectors (24 or 30lbers)...

Mike - I enjoy being inferred as "stupid"

"Some" people make their analysis of what part to get by trying to be different than others...but "if it ain't broke...don't fix it"...their are simply just some personalities that like to go different and praise it without having any real back-up on either side...

Some people need to give suggestions for a particular setup and not so GENERAL...

David
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Dec 12, 2004
#19
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #19
Agreed 5spd GT.

Installing too large a throttle body can hurt performance, particularly torque as will installing too large a carburetor. This is especially true when talking about natually aspirated cars. Turbocharged or supercharged cars make up for the torque loss by capitalizing on high rpm airflow. The last thing to remember about choosing a throttlebody is shouldn't be larger than your mass air meter. You want to create a funnel for the air, so the mass air meter and filter should be large and necking down to the throttlebody.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 12, 2004
#20
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #20
David, I was NOT calling you stupid. I wouldnt do that.

The last thing to remember about choosing a throttlebody is shouldn't be larger than your mass air meter. You want to create a funnel for the air, so the mass air meter and filter should be large and necking down to the throttlebody.
Click to expand...

Wrong in oh so many ways
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
717
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
371
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
414
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
741
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?