• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

65mm or 70mm TB?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox racer
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

fox racer

Member
Jun 22, 2004
577
0
16
Staten Island, NYC
Nov 6, 2005
#1
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #1
ok, i have GT-40 turbo swirl heads, a cobra intake, 24lbs inj. waiting to go on, 1.7 RR, pullies, 14* timing, no smog and maybe in the future a custom cam. can i get away with a 70 mm TB for now? or will i just notice a power loss like others have?
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Nov 6, 2005
#2
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #2
75mm! why buy a 65 or 70 when a 75 is only like $20 more? And dont believe all the BS about "losing power" just look at the LS engines from GM they use even bigger TBs from the factory!
 

notchback

Founding Member
May 30, 2000
1,950
0
36
St Clair Shores MI
Nov 6, 2005
#3
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #3
the opening on the intake is only 70mm.......and you don't need any more than that anyways. 65 is good til about 400 hp, but since the opening is 70, you don't wanna run into a wall

i'd go 70
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 6, 2005
#4
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #4
70mm at least. You may not feel much, but you should see a solid 8-10hp.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Nov 6, 2005
#5
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #5
Grn92LX said:
70mm at least. You may not feel much, but you should see a solid 8-10hp.
Click to expand...

im with him...
 

payupsucka

Member
Sep 28, 2003
324
0
16
Keeping it grimy in Fall river MA.
Nov 6, 2005
#6
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #6
not to hijack the thread but, i have a 65 mm tb tw heads a cobra intake and an e cam and everyone told me that the tb and mass air was the restriction and that i should go bigger be cause my numbers were low i made 276 and 315 tq. a 65 is good to 400?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 6, 2005
#7
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #7
payupsucka said:
not to hijack the thread but, i have a 65 mm tb tw heads a cobra intake and an e cam and everyone told me that the tb and mass air was the restriction and that i should go bigger be cause my numbers were low i made 276 and 315 tq. a 65 is good to 400?
Click to expand...

That 65mm tb is holding you back a little as compared to the proper sized 75mm, But the 65mm isn't your problem for those low #'s. What was your timing at? How was the a/f? My old TW headed 302 liked 18* initial.
 

payupsucka

Member
Sep 28, 2003
324
0
16
Keeping it grimy in Fall river MA.
Nov 6, 2005
#8
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #8
timing is at 14 and i cant remember the a/f i also heard that my cobra intake was the weak link but i dont buy it
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 6, 2005
#9
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #9
payupsucka said:
timing is at 14 and i cant remember the a/f i also heard that my cobra intake was the weak link but i dont buy it
Click to expand...


The a/f is important to know. I gained 1.5 mph at the track on my old trickflow 302 combo going from 14* to 18* timing. The cobra manifold is ok for now, you're only running an E cam.
 

Repostyle

Member
Jun 11, 2005
538
0
16
Portland, OR
Nov 6, 2005
#10
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #10
I had my cobra upper machined to a 75mm opening to get rid of the "wall" and a 75mm TB and have no problems.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Nov 6, 2005
#11
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #11
In long runner intakes, most of the velosity is made in the long runners, therefor the TB isn't where it is created. Really, I would do the 70mm because the inlet is 70mm, try to keep a smooth path. Having a large inlet and outlet, but small in the middle is called an orifice, and that is a restriction.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 6, 2005
#12
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #12
vikingpower said:
75mm! why buy a 65 or 70 when a 75 is only like $20 more? And dont believe all the BS about "losing power" just look at the LS engines from GM they use even bigger TBs from the factory!
Click to expand...

There is alot more factors than just TB size...lol...to why they get the power they do.

I would go no bigger than a 70mm...

You will lose low rpm pickup and have a goosy feeling under part throttle conditions.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 6, 2005
#13
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #13
Either a 65 or 70 should work fine -- there's no performance downside to going with the 65 and no performance upside to going with the 70. Neither will be a bottleneck with the HP/torque your combo is gonna make.
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Nov 6, 2005
#14
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #14
vikingpower said:
75mm! why buy a 65 or 70 when a 75 is only like $20 more? And dont believe all the BS about "losing power" just look at the LS engines from GM they use even bigger TBs from the factory!
Click to expand...

GM is also providing a lot more cubes from the factory than the 302 has. Bigger is not always better, 65 should be good for him 70 max especially since he needs to port match his intake to the throttle body if he goes above 70 in most cases.
 

88_GT_5_oh

Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan
Jul 4, 2004
1
0
1
WPG/MB/CA
Nov 7, 2005
#15
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #15
fyi alot of turbo guys run 70 mms on stock and cobra intakes. and alot of cars make 400+ rwhp
 

JimBowy

Member
Nov 8, 2003
330
0
17
Downriver, Mi
Nov 22, 2005
#16
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #16
can the cobra intake be ported to accept the 75mm perfectly?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 23, 2005
#17
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #17
JimBowy said:
can the cobra intake be ported to accept the 75mm perfectly?
Click to expand...

Yes, guys on here have said they've done it.
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Nov 23, 2005
#18
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #18
65mm is lots for any 302/306 combo unless you supercharge.A 70mm would just soften your bottom end with no top end gain.Preserve your bottom end and enjoy driving your car for what you probably do the vast majority of the time - normal everyday driving.
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Nov 23, 2005
#19
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #19
I don't agree with anything smaller than a 70mm. I was making 260rwtq@2000 rpms with a 70mm....I don't think that's losing low end. Go with the biggest TB/EGR your intake is opened up to. Also I have seen dynos with TB/EGR's on mid 300hp engines and the 75mm didn't lose any down low and made a few more ponnies on top.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 23, 2005
#20
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #20
crash7772 - There are a lot more factors for the torque at 2000rpm than just the throttle body. Stroke/cam/heads/intake/maf/exhaust/etc. Not a valid point
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
333
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
806
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
MAF Voltage Readings.
  • PonyGTrider
  • Oct 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 4, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?