• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

65mm or 70mm throttle body for my setup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zorro
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2007
Z

Zorro

Founding Member
Jan 21, 1999
294
0
16
LOS ANGELES
Oct 24, 2007
#1
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #1
Hey everyone! I am gathering parts for my setup. Going to install AFR 165s. b303 cam, and an edelbrock performer intake=what size throttle body from ford racing do I go with 65 or 70? edelbrocks website says to go with the 70mm "for optimum performance. I always thought a 65 was plenty for a mild street combo. Thanks for any help!
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Oct 24, 2007
#2
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #2
just match your tb to your intake if you don't plan on more mods in the future. a larger tb will hurt throttle response slightly if the rest doesn't match. i'm running a 70mm tb on a stock intake, but i plan on doing a lot more engine mods in the future, so i'm not worried about it. it is port matched to the stock intake though(a LOT of grinding BTW), but it's not the best for what i am running now.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 24, 2007
#3
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #3
70mm is the ticket
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 24, 2007
#4
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #4
65 is plenty, but the 70mm throttle body is the same size opening as the Performer intake opening. To bad it necks down to less than 65mm in the intake tract anyways

It is just a 'general rule.'
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Oct 24, 2007
#5
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #5
70mm is the ticket. Its a happy medium
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 24, 2007
#6
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #6
I think the 65 will be more than enough for your combo...however the intake is matched for a 70mm TB so i would go with that.

You will likely notice a change in off idle throttle response with the larger TB...but nothing too negative. should be a strong running combo...

However if i were you i would save the money for the TB and use it towards a custom cam. The stock TB wont hurt you as much as a custom cam would gain you. Or you can try to find a used 65mm explorer TB for cheap AND get the custom cam!

If i would have known better when i put my combo together i most definitely would have gotten a custom cam! good luck man
 

fastford91

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
254
1
0
Niagara ,Ontario, Canada
Oct 24, 2007
#7
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #7
go with 70 i have 75mm on mine itll be good!
 
B

BYRDPE

Founding Member
Nov 4, 1998
1,556
0
37
Memphis,Tn.
Oct 24, 2007
#8
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #8
fastford91 said:
go with 70 i have 75mm on mine itll be good!
Click to expand...

:OT:
Reading your sig I didn't see a blower but you are running 42 lb injectors?
Doesn't your car run too rich?
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Oct 24, 2007
#9
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #9
BYRDPE said:
:OT:
Reading your sig I didn't see a blower but you are running 42 lb injectors?
Doesn't your car run too rich?
Click to expand...

Probably has a tuner or a MAF calibrated for them. Either that or he's running super low fuel pressure.
 

fastford91

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
254
1
0
Niagara ,Ontario, Canada
Oct 24, 2007
#10
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #10
samickguy15 said:
Probably has a tuner or a MAF calibrated for them. Either that or he's running super low fuel pressure.
Click to expand...

have both! and im going to be getting the vortech!
 
B

BYRDPE

Founding Member
Nov 4, 1998
1,556
0
37
Memphis,Tn.
Oct 24, 2007
#11
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #11
fastford91 said:
have both! and im going to be getting the vortech!
Click to expand...

Congrats...
I want to get blown.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 25, 2007
#12
  • Oct 25, 2007
  • #12
who doesnt
 

Merrickd

Founding Member
Nov 14, 2000
98
2
18
Madison/Janesville,WI
Oct 25, 2007
#13
  • Oct 25, 2007
  • #13
I have a 70 on my FTI,AFR 165, RPM combo and throttle response is great! I have run consistant 12.60's without much tuning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
733
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine Throttle body gasket
  • MUSTANGJOE
  • Aug 29, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 3, 2023
vferrizz
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?