• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

67 mustang coupe hard top weight 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter Damein17
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2005
D

Damein17

Member
Jul 26, 2004
123
0
16
Lexington, Kentucky
Dec 11, 2005
#1
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #1
hey i did a little searching but couldnt come up with anything.. i think it as my search words but not sure.


i am wondering what a 67 mustang coupe weight is with a 302 or a 289 in it.. also it is a hardtop not a vert. so if any one knows that would be great.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Dec 11, 2005
#2
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #2
Depends on how big your ass is. Less than 3,000 lbs. though.
 
D

Damein17

Member
Jul 26, 2004
123
0
16
Lexington, Kentucky
Dec 11, 2005
#3
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #3
ok well how abot off the lot what did the 67 v8hard top coupe weigh
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Dec 11, 2005
#4
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #4
Mustang Hardtop, 2,695 lb. (Six), 2,885 lb. (V-8)
Mustang Fastback 2+2, 2,725 lb (Six), 2,915 lb. (V-8)
Mustang Convertible, 2,855 lb. (Six), 3,045 lb (V-8)
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 11, 2005
#5
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #5
that seems really light. my 5.0L is 3000lbs with fibre glass on it. maybe i should get a classic stang like i have always wanted and through the 351w at it. i thought they were much heavier.
 

Stangboy67

New Member
Aug 26, 2005
59
0
0
Lynnwood, WA
Dec 11, 2005
#6
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #6
I'm heavier...?

Last time at the track (a few Years ago) mine tipped the scales at 3080 lbs. That included full spare and nearly full gas tank. I did add a bunch of under carpet and firewall insulation (daily driver) when I went through the car a decade ago. Time to put it on a diet.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 11, 2005
#7
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #7
86bluecobra said:
that seems really light. my 5.0L is 3000lbs with fibre glass on it. maybe i should get a classic stang like i have always wanted and through the 351w at it. i thought they were much heavier.
Click to expand...


Fox bodies are pigs compared to the classics. There is nothing in a classic to remove for weight except carpet and sound deadener. Everything else is pretty much used
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Dec 11, 2005
#8
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #8
86bluecobra said:
that seems really light. my 5.0L is 3000lbs with fibre glass on it. maybe i should get a classic stang like i have always wanted and through the 351w at it. i thought they were much heavier.
Click to expand...

Kinda ironic isnt it? Thicker steel body, steel bumpers, steel dash, and still 200-300lbs lighter than the average Fox3. Foxes have alot more wiring(copper=heavy), insulation, accessories, power everything, etc. About the lowest you can get one on the stock unibody is 2800 lbs. My '89 GT was around 3200, but it didnt feel that heavy.

The 71-73 cars are heavier, however.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Dec 11, 2005
#9
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #9
86bluecobra said:
that seems really light. my 5.0L is 3000lbs with fibre glass on it. maybe i should get a classic stang like i have always wanted and throw the 351w at it. i thought they were much heavier.
Click to expand...



you could do it but you most likely not do any better time wise right off the bat ... it would take some suspesion work to pull a 1.60' 60'.

amnit: fox bodies so much better than us classic guys
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Dec 11, 2005
#10
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #10
86bluecobra said:
that seems really light. my 5.0L is 3000lbs with fibre glass on it. maybe i should get a classic stang like i have always wanted and through the 351w at it. i thought they were much heavier.
Click to expand...
I figured everyone else was quoting ya,.... It's nice, but aerodynamics are less then great and suspension is kinda tough to work with. I wish Ca would get their head outta their ass so i could build a fox street/strip car
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Dec 11, 2005
#11
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #11
lol i don't think i have ever been quoted so much in one thread. i have fiber glass doors and hatch and hood. I even have lexan glass in the rear hatch. mind you i do have a 351w which is a heavy beast and a 10 point roll cage. i wish i was 2800lbs. i guess ill have to get my 270lbs a$$ on a diet to gain another half tenth.
 

Alarus

New Member
Apr 29, 2005
226
0
0
Az
Dec 12, 2005
#12
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #12
my 73 is 4213lbs....i didnt know there was that big of a differance between the 60's and mine...WOW!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
137
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
T
New Guy from Southeast Missouri
  • tcooke11
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
268
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2026
TomcatPC
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
130
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?