• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

72 Mustang GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter jas142
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2004
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Sep 12, 2004
#1
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #1
I don't know much about classic stangs.. I own an 04. But my dad and I are looking for a project car to work on together, and we found a 72 Mustang GT with 70k miles, auto tranny, 302 motor.

Is the 302 motor stock from those years, or does that mean its swapped from the 5.0 years?

Whats ths specs on a 72 Mustang GT? Thanks
 

Platonic Solid

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
1,960
5
39
CT-USA
Sep 13, 2004
#2
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #2
I don't think there is such an animal as a 72 Mustang GT.
Stock choices for 72 are: 302 2V, 351 2V, 351 4V, 351 4V HO.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 13, 2004
#3
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #3
If I am not mistaken GT ended in 69 and was revived in 82. In 72, it would have just been trim anyway. 302-2v engines were the most common for that year.
 
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Sep 13, 2004
#4
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #4
Alright thanks guys. What were the stats on the 302-2v. HP/Torque? Any good cheap potential with a 4v carb/headers/exhaust? And where they all fastbacks that year?
 

Stang_1973

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
565
9
38
San Antonio, Tx.
Sep 13, 2004
#5
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #5
Well its good to see you are looking forward to restoring a car. I'll try and help you out.

1. No, they were not all fastbacks. The the Mach 1 is a fastback but not all fastbacks are Mach 1's. Try posting your VIN, I am sure some one here will help you decode it and tell you what exactly it is you've got.

2. The 302-2v wasn't exactly the most powerful engine in its stock form. It was pretty weak due to federal regulations. However, you can make it into a mean engine with the right combo of intake, carb, cam, headers and exhuast. Gears will help too if you dont already have 'em.

hope this helps, BTW got any pics of the car?
 
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Sep 13, 2004
#6
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #6
Stang_1973 said:
Well its good to see you are looking forward to restoring a car. I'll try and help you out.

1. No, they were not all fastbacks. The the Mach 1 is a fastback but not all fastbacks are Mach 1's. Try posting your VIN, I am sure some one here will help you decode it and tell you what exactly it is you've got.

2. The 302-2v wasn't exactly the most powerful engine in its stock form. It was pretty weak due to federal regulations. However, you can make it into a mean engine with the right combo of intake, carb, cam, headers and exhuast. Gears will help too if you dont already have 'em.

hope this helps, BTW got any pics of the car?
Click to expand...

Don't own it yet, just a car we've seen on autotrader and will probably checkout in person later this week.. looks pretty rough outside, but as long as its sound mechanicly we'll look forward to restoring it.
 
K

kcp203

Founding Member
Mar 27, 2002
222
0
0
Oak Ridge, NJ
Sep 13, 2004
#7
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #7
jas142 said:
Don't own it yet, just a car we've seen on autotrader and will probably checkout in person later this week.. looks pretty rough outside, but as long as its sound mechanicly we'll look forward to restoring it.
Click to expand...

This is the wrong approach to take with a 71-73. It is MUCH cheaper if the body is solid and the mechanicals are shot. 71-73 body parts are not always easy to find in good repro's, and NOS parts are very expensive because of this. (Take it from one who knows from experience!) Body parts are much easier foor earlier models i.e. 64-66.

You will always be best off to find a car with a solid body (no rust) that just needs cosmetic work. The mechanicals are cheap to find and replace since all powertrain options were available accross many Ford models and years.
 

Platonic Solid

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
1,960
5
39
CT-USA
Sep 13, 2004
#8
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #8
kcp203 said:
This is the wrong approach to take with a 71-73. It is MUCH cheaper if the body is solid and the mechanicals are shot. 71-73 body parts are not always easy to find in good repro's, and NOS parts are very expensive because of this. (Take it from one who knows from experience!) Body parts are much easier foor earlier models i.e. 64-66.

You will always be best off to find a car with a solid body (no rust) that just needs cosmetic work. The mechanicals are cheap to find and replace since all powertrain options were available accross many Ford models and years.
Click to expand...

Amen to that!

When you do go look at the car, pop the hood and remove the two plastic snap-in cowl covers at the base of the windsheild. Shine a flashlight in there, or better yet reach your arm in towards the passenger side and feel for rust. There is a hat shaped chimney (approx. 7in in dia.) in there that provides air flow to the heater. If that area is rotted out, you're looking at a difficult repair with no aftermarket parts available to help you. Here's a couple pics to give you an idea of how bad this area can get. (Note: the top cowl sheetmetal has been removed in these pictures.)





 

Attachments

  • mustang2cowl.webp
    41.7 KB · Views: 135
  • cowl1.webp
    45.3 KB · Views: 151
  • cowl2.webp
    42.5 KB · Views: 122
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
186
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
P
New here
  • PortCity
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
80
The Welcome Wagon Jun 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
New here, just saying hi.
  • Tank Mechanic
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
162
The Welcome Wagon Nov 2, 2025
nickyb
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
51
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
Bought a 2001 GT from My Son
  • Hawkester
  • Oct 17, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
192
The Welcome Wagon Oct 17, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?