• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

86 heads / mod

  • Thread starter Thread starter 85mcLaren
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2005

85mcLaren

Member
Feb 26, 2004
45
0
7
Jul 26, 2005
#1
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #1
Does anyone know what the 86 heads flow. Is there ANY benifit to changing the intake on an 86 with factory 86 heads or does the factory intake flow well enough with these choked up heads. I know the first stopping point on an 87 - 93 is the lower intake, but don't know if this also applies to an 86 since the heads are different.... ??

I am also going to post this on a couple of different sites since other pepole may respond as well....

Jason
 

Thenemesis

Member
Nov 16, 2004
321
0
17
chuckletown, sc
Jul 26, 2005
#2
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #2
86 heads are HORRIBLE for flow.. my E cam doesnt even give as much power as it should bc of them and my gt40 doesnt flow as good as it should bc of them.. yeah they suck
 

joeythesaint

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
402
0
0
Seattle
Jul 26, 2005
#3
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #3
(EDIT: Removed excessively negative comment)

I'm putting my engine together tomorrow -- a dual-quad tunnel rammed '86 H.O. -- and I should have it alive by the end of the weekend, so I'll tell you on Sunday how porting the hell out of the heads works. It oughta go like the proverbial raped ape.

I ported my '86 heads clear out to match my headers and gasket-matched the intake with my 289 tunnel-ram intake. I'll be running it with a custom cam with a longer intake duration (so as to come alive right where the secondaries start pulling on the tunnel ram), keeping the original .444 lift. (Safety first!)

The factory heads on the '86 are poorly designed but the '86 only makes 25 HP less than the '87, and I've read that most of that is from the exhausts, which makes sense because the exhaust ports are about the size of peanut shells and have that stupid nub in them, to boot. Porting your heads well should make a huge difference. Plus, the '86 heads have the shallowest torque curve of any of the stock heads, and torque, of course, is what you should be concerned about. I'm eager to see how mine runs.

Of course, this is all academic until I turn the key this weekend. I could be sorely misguided, here; but then, I am doing this myself. I'll keep you posted.
 

joeythesaint

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
402
0
0
Seattle
Jul 26, 2005
#4
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #4
Nemesis, are you running an E cam in a stock '86 block?
 

Thenemesis

Member
Nov 16, 2004
321
0
17
chuckletown, sc
Jul 26, 2005
#5
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #5
ya e cam with gt40 intake.. basically doesnt help much since all the nice flow just gets the crap smacked out of it once it comes to the heads.. with whatever new car i get im just gonna put all the stock back on the 86 and put the e cam, gt40 intake, tb, maf, 24# inj, 1.6 rollers, headers.. basically everything the 86 doesnt need bc those heads kill it all.. cam just changed the sound.. actually less power with it instead of more since it kicks in at 3500 and the heads die at 3500
 

Daniel50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
716
1
0
Discovery Bay, CA
Jul 26, 2005
#6
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #6
the e7 heads are cheap used. get those ported and make a ton more power than those crap e6's
 

joeythesaint

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
402
0
0
Seattle
Jul 26, 2005
#7
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #7
Nemesis, you run the e cam without any p/v clearance issues on the stock flat-top '86 pistons?
 

Thenemesis

Member
Nov 16, 2004
321
0
17
chuckletown, sc
Jul 26, 2005
#8
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • #8
yea.. they have enough clearance with a cam as long as its like.. less the .500.. which im cuttin it with the E cam and 1.6 rollers.. this bottom end hasnt been fly cut.. and the heads have new valves and springs.. but they still are crap..

daniel: can't, flat top pistons will murder the valves in the first 5 mins of runnin.. and im 15.. i cant affoard to pull down my driver car, put new pistons and everything else in it.. if i did that i would do a 306 kit.. but i need money out the *** to do that lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
245
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
544
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
315
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
481
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
568
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?