• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

88 mark VII 5.0 same as 88 stang 5.0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89white50
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2005
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Oct 20, 2005
#1
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #1
I know they are almost identical, but i was wondering what the differences are, if any? I am looking at a complete motor, it has 112k for the low price of 150 bucks. Intake to oil pan and comes with the injectors and wiring harness. I am only going to be using the bare block for my buildup, but i was wondering because the rest of the parts i dont need i plan on cleaning and selling?
 
M

macx

New Member
Jul 18, 2004
228
0
0
SE Missouri near Cape Girardeau
Oct 20, 2005
#2
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #2
Yup, same.

The 5.0 went out in my wife's old 89 LSC,
I just got a Stang 5.0 and put in there.

Identical.
 

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Oct 20, 2005
#3
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • #3
same engine.
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
Marengo,Ohio,US
Oct 21, 2005
#4
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #4
If it is a LSC it will say H.O. is this correct and if it is not the LSC it is not a H.O. Can someone please verify this because I took the intake off of a non-LSC and it did not say HO under the upper intake cover plate and when looking in the junk yard and the LSC car did say H.O. under the Plate. I took the LSC engine and figured the none H.O. intake engine was like the Thunderbird 5.0 and not like the Mustang.
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Oct 21, 2005
#5
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #5
thanks a bunch guys
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Oct 21, 2005
#6
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #6
Pretty simple-
Coming from an Ex-lincoln guy, 87-92 LSC's are indeed 5.0L H.O. roller motors (225HP 300lb-TQ). they have speed density set-ups though, not mass air. Never was mass air, Although can be set up as one.
You must be careful, because Mark Vii bill blass models are not the H.O. motor. Easy way to tell-Digital dash cars always came with non-H.O.'s. Analog gauges were H.O.'s. They have the non H.O. set up. As the CONTI's and Town cars are all non h.O. versions of the 5L. Lincoln's LSC's were billed as the gentlemans mustang in the 80's 90's. And always look under the intake plaque for the inscription H.O. on the plenum.
Also know- the injectors are 19lb'ers, the intake tube is smaller and isnt the mustang intake tube, and the bracketry for the accessories are different as well. The smog crap and everything else is identical to the stang, except the pullies ar4e larger on the lincoln too!

hope this helps to clarify!
Anthony
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Oct 21, 2005
#7
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #7
it's says, and has, the same intake plaque my stang has. The 5.0 HO. Im really not too worried cuz all i need is the bare block to start my 331 build, so as long as the block is a hydr. roller.
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Oct 21, 2005
#8
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #8
dude-You have to worry-

because you dont want the block/pistons from a non H.O.. they are different weaker pistons and camshaft. totally different animal than the H.O.

Anthony
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Oct 21, 2005
#9
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #9
i definately am not using the pistons or any of the rotating assembly. just the bare bones block will be getting machined.
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Oct 21, 2005
#10
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #10
cool deal, my mistake. i thought you were gonna use the internals, didnt read it right

Good luck-Ant
 

nazstang

Member
Mar 26, 2004
204
0
16
Rhode Island
Oct 21, 2005
#11
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #11
are the pistons forged too, or cast?
 

larrendeuce

Member
Sep 13, 2003
649
1
19
Southern NJ
Oct 21, 2005
#12
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #12
I've had 2 LSC's an 88 and 89, still have the 89. The pistons are forged.
 

payupsucka

Member
Sep 28, 2003
324
0
16
Keeping it grimy in Fall river MA.
Oct 21, 2005
#13
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #13
i have seen 2 lincoln lscs in a junk yard around here and when you lift the hood it is identical to a mustang down to the tube headers and cast aluminum valve covers iam acutally gonna buy the motor out of one of them cuz its so cheap
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Oct 21, 2005
#14
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #14
no problem! yea i am pretty pump about this motor, it's in great condition so hopefully selling the parts i dont need goes well. it comes with computer and harness too.
 
S

superhuaman

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
907
0
0
Harrisburg, PA
Oct 23, 2005
#15
  • Oct 23, 2005
  • #15
Just to let everybody know, if you're going to strip the motor and just use the block and/or crank, there's no need to avoid the 87-up non-HO's. Same roller cam block, same crank. The only difference in the HO and non-HO is the cam, computer, and spark plug wires on the distributor. Get a Crown Vic motor cheap. Of course you can't do that if you need other parts too that are 'Mustang style'
 

mpe331lx

New Member
Jul 3, 2005
20
0
0
FL
Oct 23, 2005
#16
  • Oct 23, 2005
  • #16
A quick way to tell if it is an H.O without removing the intake plaque. Follow the plug wire from the #1 cyl (1st clyl on pass side) wire to the distributer, look at the next terminal to the left. If that wire goes to the passenger side (#3 cyl), its a H.O. If it goes to the drivers side (#5 cyl) ,it is a non H.O.

This applies a long as some bonehead never did a tune up with the wrong firing order!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
289
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
591
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?