• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Advantages of Port & Polish on intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter JamesBaumann
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2004

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 3, 2004
#1
  • May 3, 2004
  • #1
I just bought a used stock 2.3 cylinder head and a stock intake. I am going to take the head to the machine shop and get a bunch of performance increasing machine work done to it (roller cam, port&polish, air flow modifications, oversize valves etc.) and the guy I bought it from had an intake as well that I figured I could do some work to to potentially increase power some more. My questions here are what exactly are the pros of a port & polish job on an intake? I'm assuming that it is to increase power. If I am right, how much is power increased by? Also, how much if any does it effect your fuel economy? Any other tidbits of information about port & polish jobs or anything else to do with an intake that you may want to throw my way would be appreciated.
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
May 3, 2004
#2
  • May 3, 2004
  • #2
Are you sure your gonna put a roller cam in those heads?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 3, 2004
#3
  • May 3, 2004
  • #3
85GTlover said:
Are you sure your gonna put a roller cam in those heads?
Click to expand...

Singular "head" and sure, why not

James, the advantage is better airflow which = more power. It should effect mileage enough to notice either way. Do a search for ported or gutted intakes to find more info.

Stinger
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 3, 2004
#4
  • May 3, 2004
  • #4
Thanks Stinger, appreciate the help. Did you by any chance mean it 'shouldnt' effect fuel mileage either way? How much horsepower do you figure I would increase by by doing a port & polish on an intake?
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
May 3, 2004
#5
  • May 3, 2004
  • #5
Stinger said:
Singular "head" and sure, why not

James, the advantage is better airflow which = more power. It should effect mileage enough to notice either way. Do a search for ported or gutted intakes to find more info.

Stinger
Click to expand...
Is this OHC?
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 3, 2004
#6
  • May 3, 2004
  • #6
85GTlover said:
Is this Turbo OHC?
Click to expand...

No, just an 88 N/A 2.3
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
May 3, 2004
#7
  • May 3, 2004
  • #7
So would he not mean roller rockers? The cam part is what puzzles me, he cannot take the heads in for a roller cam it is not in the head, maybe he just included that is what he plans on doing also, but I was confused.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
May 3, 2004
#8
  • May 3, 2004
  • #8
The 140cid 2.3l engines we refer to here are all OHC engines.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 3, 2004
#9
  • May 3, 2004
  • #9
I would probly do a search on this since but here is a little B.s I think about it I would think if its going to be a N/A or Nitrous 2.3L that gutting the upper intake would hurt you more than help you. No runners = less low end TQ and high end HP while long runners = Low end TQ and mid range HP. Thats a rough idea so don't qoute me on it. Probly the thing I would do is clean up any casting lines in the runners and port match it to a gasket. Now the head ports needs to be bigger than the intake ports that bolt to the head. Also you don't want anything that has fuel flowing through to be real smooth from what I've read. So don't go pass 80 gritt paper and becareful since aulminum is real soft you could take more off than what you want before you know it. Here is a link that may help you out and have fun


http://www.sa-motorsports.com/diyport.htm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
504
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
G
Anyone Extrude Hone or Flow Bench Speed Pro Heads?
  • giddyup306v1.1
  • Mar 1, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
10
Views
559
Fox Engine Swaparoo Mar 29, 2026
2000xp8
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
310
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?