• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

AFR 165s PS3 install issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91notchbk
  • Start date Start date Jan 25, 2007
9

91notchbk

Member
Nov 20, 2006
163
1
18
Jackson Michigan
Jan 25, 2007
#1
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #1
I have the PS3 kit and I am having problems with the set-up. The stock AFR spring installed height that the heads originally have is 1.800-1.815. Ed Curtis set up the PS3 kit with shims that will get you .030 longer than the stock height. So since the kit shims off of the stock height the installed height for the new springs is 1.830-1.845. So here is the problem. My origional-installed height is around 1.775-1.785 which is too short according to specs. So when I install the kit as prescribed in the instructions it sets my installed height .030 longer than stock which since my stock is actually 1.775-1.785 it now sets the PS3 springs to 1.805-1.815. This is far under the suggested 1.830-1.845. I don't know why the original installed height is so far off? I don't know if I should install the kit as prescribed and be under specs, or re-shim every valve to get the suggested 1.830-1.845? Ed Curtis is on vacation and I need to get these heads together.
 

95opal

5 Year Member
Nov 16, 2004
449
20
39
Jan 25, 2007
#2
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #2
Did you leave the stock AFR shims in and just take out the spring locator cups?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 25, 2007
#3
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #3
With the shorter installed height you'll have a little more seat pressure, but your also going to shorten the coil bind window. What is the exact configuration your parts are in as far as the shims go, etc...

Rick
 
9

91notchbk

Member
Nov 20, 2006
163
1
18
Jackson Michigan
Jan 25, 2007
#4
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #4
95opal said:
Did you leave the stock AFR shims in and just take out the spring locator cups?
Click to expand...

The first thing I did is follow the instructions from the kit and just removed the spring cups and left the shims. But after I did this and re-measured the installed height ranged from 1.809 to 1.817. Which is too tight according to the specs of 1.830-1.845.

The next thing I did was measure the shims under the cups. The exhaust shims were all .030 and the intake were all .060. So I took the .030 out completely and left only the hardened shim from the kit on the exhaust valves. I then took the .030 shim that was originally on the exhaust, and installed them on the intake side. This raised my installed height to around 1.839 to 1.847 range. This is where I am at right now. I just don't know if I should run them long at the 1.839-1.847 range or put the shims back to their original location and run them short at 1.809-1.817? I am also wondering if AFR intentionally runs them tight because maybe they will loosen after they are ran on the motor? My cam is a Comp XE270HR-14 with only .512 of lift so I would think I would be ok with having them tight with my cam since it doesn't have much lift and these springs are supposed to be good to .635 lift without binding issues?

My last option is to just re-shim all the valves to attain the 1.830 installed height?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 25, 2007
#5
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #5
Having a little extra installed heighjt based on that cam will not hurt you at all, to be honest you really did not need the PS3 with that cam.

Re-shim the valve springs to aquire the proper installed height, if you need different shims amny machine shops have them in stock. Just make sure you get the hardened shims.

I assume your using a valve spring micrometer to measure the installed height?
 
9

91notchbk

Member
Nov 20, 2006
163
1
18
Jackson Michigan
Jan 25, 2007
#6
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #6
I am not using hardened shims (shims with the AFR heads not hardened). But the .030 shims with the kit are hardened so I am putting the non-hardened shims under the hardened shim from the kit. According to the PS3 instructions this is fine as long as the hardened shim is the last shim installed. Yes, I am using a height micrometer and I also have been pulling up on the retainer to make sure the locks are fully seated confirm and accurate reading.

At lunch today I put the PS3 springs on a spring checker to see what kind of pressures I would get at different heights. At 1.825 I got 140lbs, and at 1.850 I got 135lbs. This tells me that .025 changes in installed height only changed my closed pressure by 5lbs. I am starting to think I will be ok running these springs at 1.839-1.847 range and I will be fine. (AFR stock springs are 120lbs at the seat) I already installed my seals so I do not want to remove the seals (damage the seals) to install more shims if I don’t need to. But I will re-shim as you suggested if I definetly need to. I am also in the required installed height range of 1.830-1.845. Just at the higher end.

Rick, you also mentioned that the stock AFR spring would be ok with my cam. I was told by AFR that the springs are rated to 6000 rpms. I called AFR and they said that rating is for hydraulic cams not hydraulic roller cams. Due to the aggressive ramp profile of hydraulic roller cams that I probably have valve float issues at or around 5500. This is also consistent with an article on AFRs website that was conducted by muscle mustangs and fast fords where they compared heads and the AFRs did the best as far as gains, but did get valve float at 5700. http://airflowresearch.com/articles/ultimate/Group1/Part2/A-P10.htm This was with a Comp XE266HR14 cam that is not quite as aggressive as my XE270HR14 cam. I plan to rev to 6000 so that is why I upgraded.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 26, 2007
#7
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #7
I never said you didn't need Upgraded springs, I said you do not need the PS3....

You could have went the PS2 or similar spring, but the PS3 will work fine just a little heavier on the seat for that cam. I've had the PS3 up over 8000rpm with no issues, that is why I like Ed's drop in kits as well.

Yeah I tap gently on the valve with a rubber tipped hammer to ensure the locks are fully seated in my mic before I take a measurements. If your careful you can pull the seals off if needed. You'll be fine where your at as far as your installed height.
 
9

91notchbk

Member
Nov 20, 2006
163
1
18
Jackson Michigan
Jan 27, 2007
#8
  • Jan 27, 2007
  • #8
I did not know there is a PS2 kit.

You are right about the seals. I was able to gently pry them off carefully without damaging the seals in order to reshim the springs. I first took a pocket screwdriver and gently popped off the garter spring on the seal. I then coated the valve stem with oil and gently slid off the seal. By removing the garter spring that helped the seal slide off the valve. The machine shop carries .015/.030/, and .060 thick shims. There are none in between. I bought a bunch of .015. Again, I am not 100% sure what the installed height actually is. Ed does not clearly specify an installed height specification, he just gives a range. I am just going to use the 1.830 as my installed height spec. Most spring manufactures give a single installed height spec and then the rule of thumb is + or minus .010. So I reshimmed all the springs with an installed height spec of 1.830 and + or minus .010.

Here are the final installed height measurements after installing the .015 shims: 1= 1.828 2=1.820 3=1.828

4=1.823 5=1.829

6=1.820 7=1.827 8=1.828 9=1.832 10=1.820 1=1.834 12=1.829 13=1.824 14=1.822

15=1.835 16=1.820

I can now start focusing on my degreeing my cam and setting my pushrod length.



Thanks for the help on this Rick, you insight was very helpful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
609
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Suspension Foxbody ride height change after installing new control arms
  • Mhalc1
  • Jan 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 10, 2024
Mhalc1
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Engine 93 lx top end kit install now has no power.
  • anorth93
  • Aug 20, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2023
Mindseye007
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?