• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

AFR 165's & stock cam / cobra intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Jr.
  • Start date Start date Oct 29, 2007

Joe Jr.

Founding Member
Nov 16, 2001
207
5
19
Longmont area of Colorado
Oct 29, 2007
#1
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #1
I'm back and forth every week as to which heads to go with. I'm big on the 165s and gt40p's. I really want to go the AFR route, but it's hard to get past the $1300 tag just for the heads with springs that won't go far into a custom cam. So, now I'm thinking if I can live with the stock 165's and the cobra intake, I'd be happy until I could afford the custom cam/springs etc.....I'd have T moss port my cobra lower for me...

anyone running the 165's without a custom cam and a stock bottom end? If so, what kind of hp/tq #'s could be expected........I be doing the typical shorty headers, elect. fan etc....

 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 29, 2007
#2
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #2
I believe MM&FF tested the AFR 165's with a 264 Extreme energy .512 lift and got like 400 fwhp out of it
 
P

PJB

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
131
0
0
44
Rotterdam, NY
www.cardomain.com
Oct 29, 2007
#3
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #3
I bought new AFR 165's with upgraded springs good for .600 lift from Keith Craft Racing on ebay for $1400.
 

Joe Jr.

Founding Member
Nov 16, 2001
207
5
19
Longmont area of Colorado
Oct 29, 2007
#4
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #4
thanks for the replies, but I'm really interested in these heads in their stock form on a stock block with a Cobra intake......

When I see the $1400 with the upgraded springs, my first thought is that some worked over P's and a cam would still be less......
 

SuperStang83

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2001
1,693
0
49
Boyertown, Pa
Oct 29, 2007
#5
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #5
You should see a lot more power out of the AFR heads though. And if you are just going cheap now and are gonna eventually get the AFRs later on down the road, why not just wait and save for a few more months?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 29, 2007
#6
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #6
Dude P's and 165 are not even in the same ballpark I would put money on 165's and a stock cam making more power than P's and a cam
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Oct 29, 2007
#7
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #7
Of course the GT-40P heads and custom cam will come out to less than AFR 165s.... but comparing the GT-40P's to AFR 165s is like comparing a 6 cylinder mustang to a Terminator Cobra.

Well, maybe not that extreme, but you get the point.

I have owned and run numerous small block ford heads, on both carbureted and efi small blocks. That includes the GT-40Ps and the AFR 165.

I'd go with the AFR 165s and the stock cam (if you won't have the money for another cam) over the GT-40Ps with any cam, any day of the week.

Don't forget you will need specialty headers for the GT-40P heads. Their revised plug angle requires specific headers for plug access.
 

Joe Jr.

Founding Member
Nov 16, 2001
207
5
19
Longmont area of Colorado
Oct 29, 2007
#8
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #8
SuperStang83 said:
You should see a lot more power out of the AFR heads though. And if you are just going cheap now and are gonna eventually get the AFRs later on down the road, why not just wait and save for a few more months?
Click to expand...

Well your idea sounds like a good one, but i'm basically building the car from scratch, so every $100 counts....I have never had the car running. I bought it as a roller and the difference between afr's and p's is enough for a new k member.......

i was just trying to see if anyone has just run the afr's with a stock motor/cam.....

I know there's a million combos out there and that a cam will wake up the afr's....

I'm probably tending towards the afr's because of the weight advantage and the potential down the road when the rest of the car is ready......
 

Joe Jr.

Founding Member
Nov 16, 2001
207
5
19
Longmont area of Colorado
Oct 29, 2007
#9
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #9
jtfairlane said:
Of course the GT-40P heads and custom cam will come out to less than AFR 165s.... but comparing the GT-40P's to AFR 165s is like comparing a 6 cylinder mustang to a Terminator Cobra.

Well, maybe not that extreme, but you get the point.

I have owned and run numerous small block ford heads, on both carbureted and efi small blocks. That includes the GT-40Ps and the AFR 165.

I'd go with the AFR 165s and the stock cam (if you won't have the money for another cam) over the GT-40Ps with any cam, any day of the week.

Don't forget you will need specialty headers for the GT-40P heads. Their revised plug angle requires specific headers for plug access.
Click to expand...

Thats what I wanted to hear.......now you're talking. I know the potential of the 40ps and liked the idea of keeping things all Ford, but the 165s are just too damn tempting....
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
www.mysticspeed.com
Oct 30, 2007
#10
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #10
Mines carbed but I have the stock cam and short block, out of the box AFR's with 1.7 rockers. ET in sig is with 100* air temp in Az.
 
U

UnderdogGN

New Member
May 7, 2006
74
0
0
Oct 30, 2007
#11
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #11
just my personal experience with the 165's....i dropped off 1.3ish seconds in the quarter with just a head and injectors/maf swap!! I. dont think you will pick up those kind of gains with GT40p's but i do not have experience with them so i cannot say.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 30, 2007
#12
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #12
Joe Jr. said:
Well your idea sounds like a good one, but i'm basically building the car from scratch, so every $100 counts....I have never had the car running. I bought it as a roller and the difference between afr's and p's is enough for a new k member.......

The weight you save on aluminum over iron heads equals that of a tubular k member not counting the extra 40 horse you will make.
Click to expand...
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
68
Greenville, NC
Oct 31, 2007
#13
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #13
There's a thread on another board asking about the P heads and 1/4 mile times. Most of the replies are in the mid-12s. P heads make plenty of power. It just depends on how money you're willing to spend to go faster than mid 12s.
 

67coupe

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
658
402
93
Huntsville, AL
Nov 1, 2007
#14
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #14
Mods in sig. Stock cam, injectors and MAF. Runs consistent 8.6 @ 83 mph in 1/8. Full weight LX hatch with working A/C on street tires.

Edit: Also, TMoss has a dyno chart of various combos. The AFR 165, aftermarket intake, stock cam combos are around: 270 rwhp / 310 rwtq
 

Joe Jr.

Founding Member
Nov 16, 2001
207
5
19
Longmont area of Colorado
Nov 2, 2007
#15
  • Nov 2, 2007
  • #15
67coupe, thanks for the reminder that Tmoss has that kind of stuff on his site. I really trust the info. he has gathered. Another thing that got me going on the 40p's was that Thumper can do a number on them and get them rockin'. But, I think ultimately the 165's is the route....if nothing else I could resale and still get some money back........(not that I ever would.....)

67coupe said:
Mods in sig. Stock cam, injectors and MAF. Runs consistent 8.6 @ 83 mph in 1/8. Full weight LX hatch with working A/C on street tires.

Edit: Also, TMoss has a dyno chart of various combos. The AFR 165, aftermarket intake, stock cam combos are around: 270 rwhp / 310 rwtq
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
917
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
832
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
T
Resolved No run or idle
  • Thebluefox1
  • Oct 10, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
526
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
DadLife0724
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?