• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

AFR or Trickflow top end? please read!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Must5a0angGt86
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2005
M

Must5a0angGt86

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
178
0
0
CT
Nov 17, 2005
#1
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #1
I am in the middle of building a new stroker for my 89' and need so advice. I have a DSS 347 with the pro-lite pistons. I was set on using my brand new AFR 165's (which may be for sale now) and my edelbrock performer intake. I got my new Summit in the mail the other day and saw that Trickflow is now offering a complete top end setup. I was interested in the Track heat kit. It has the Twisted wedge heads, track heat intake, cam, pushrods, RR's and timing chain set for i believe its $2400 or something like that. I was wondering what anyone had to say about this?? any input would be great. If I do go this way I will probably sell my B-cam, AFR's, and Performer intake which should be able to offset a decent amount of the cost of this kit. Anyone with any input would be great as I am looking to get this done soon to get my car up and running by the spring time. Thanks a lot guys.

Josh
 

soontobefastfox

Member
Nov 15, 2005
275
0
16
Troy, Michigan
Nov 17, 2005
#2
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #2
165's are a little small for your 347. I would go with 190cc head because you have increased the stroke and bore. The trickflow track heat package is good but with a 347 you can do much better. My opinion is to sell your afr's for a dart, afr, or even a victor jr head.

and also go with a different cam, ford's alphabet cams are way outdated, go with a comp cam, crane, etc or even a custom grind to your combo for the best gain.
 
J

j48i

New Member
Mar 24, 2003
20
0
0
Nov 17, 2005
#3
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #3
I call first dibs on those 165's if you sell them If you were to sell them, how much?
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Nov 17, 2005
#4
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #4
oh yeah, forget the b-cam! I'd say keep what you got and upgrade the valvesprings on your AFR's so you can run a big cam
 

soontobefastfox

Member
Nov 15, 2005
275
0
16
Troy, Michigan
Nov 17, 2005
#5
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #5
vikingpower said:
oh yeah, forget the b-cam! I'd say keep what you got and upgrade the valvesprings on your AFR's so you can run a big cam
Click to expand...

good man, I thought this thread would have more replies than I want to buy your heads by now.
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Nov 17, 2005
#6
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #6
165's are only good to about .520" valve lift ...
Anything above this point will not add additional benefit for you without porting the heads.

What cc chamber do you have?

165's will perform pretty damn well on a 347 relative to what you may be accustomed to. However, I think the TW's or the 185's are a better match to your 3.4" stroker.

The Performer intake is a good match to the 165's though ...
I think what a lot of us are saying is you are leaving a little bit of power on the table without destroying driveability.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Nov 17, 2005
#7
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #7
CoupedUp said:
165's are only good to about .520" valve lift ...
Anything above this point will not add additional benefit for you without porting the heads.
Click to expand...

Get a cam that lifts to about .500", but with alot of duration to keep them valves open sooner/later so you'll have more 'area under the curve' so to speak and allow the smaller 165cc + 1.90 intake valves to feed the stroker. Should do ya fine, the 165's are able to feed a 347 to about 6000 rpms with an appropriate cam. I seen ads in some mags Comp Cams has some new grinds specifically for 331-347 stroker small blocks, check 'em out
 

soontobefastfox

Member
Nov 15, 2005
275
0
16
Troy, Michigan
Nov 17, 2005
#8
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #8
vikingpower said:
Get a cam that lifts to about .500", but with alot of duration to keep them valves open sooner/later so you'll have more 'area under the curve' so to speak and allow the smaller 165cc + 1.90 intake valves to feed the stroker. Should do ya fine, the 165's are able to feed a 347 to about 6000 rpms with an appropriate cam. I seen ads in some mags Comp Cams has some new grinds specifically for 331-347 stroker small blocks, check 'em out
Click to expand...

thats a good alternative if he doesn't have the money for bigger heads, but if he sells his current heads and gets one of those new 331-347 stroker comp cams, he will have a very fast driveable car. And no doubt he will too with the combo posted above. Its just there is some power left on the table.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Nov 18, 2005
#9
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #9
If you can swing it, summit now sells ported TFS heads (done by TEA i believe). There was a write up about them in a 5.0Mustang and super fords mag over the summer. Chassis dyno on a 347 with box stock TFS heads the motor peaked at 6,000rpms at 375.74 hp. Torque peak was at 4,900 and was 353.56. With the ported heads from summit hp peak moved up to 6,400 and 425.95hp and torque was at 5300 and 377.15 while torque at 6400 was up 50ft lbs over the non ported heads. All they list about the combo is, "10:1 compression Pauls Automotive Engineering 347 small block with box-stock TFS heads, Victor Jr intake, Holley carb, and a custom cam of undisclosed #'s. Even after a full season of fun the car still put down 375hp to the wheels through a tremec". The motor was in an American Iron road race car.
mike.
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
Nov 18, 2005
#10
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #10
My combo

331
Victor Jr heads
Victor Jr intake
Holley 750 HP carb
AFM N-91 cam
bbk unequal shorties
off road h
slowmaster 2.5" catback
stock t-5
4.30 gears

406 hp at 6488 to the wheels
371 ft lbs at 4760 to the wheels
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
93 5.0 Microsquirt with Stage 3 trickflow tuning issues
  • marxpreston11
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
756
Digital Self-tuning Forum Thursday at 9:22 PM
Mustang5L5
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
902
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
713
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
505
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?